Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T06:13:24.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Plural Society and the Western Political Tradition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Kenneth D. McRae
Kenneth D. McRae
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1979 , pp. 675 - 688
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For summaries of the incident, see Morris, C., Western Political Thought, Vol. 1 (New York: Basic Books, 1967), 123–24Google Scholar, and Tarn, W. W., Alexander the Great (Boston: Beacon Press, 1956), 115–17Google Scholar. For a more critical view, see Badian, E., “Alexander the Great and the Unity of Mankind,” Historia 7 (1958), 428–32.Google Scholar

2 Fora brief overview, see Thomson, J. A. K. (ed.), The Ethics of Aristotle (London: Penguin Books, 1955), 13–15.Google Scholar

3 See Nicholls, D., Three Varieties of Pluralism (London: Macmillan, 1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and also his The Pluralist State (London: Macmillan, 1975).Google Scholar

4 Nicholls, Three Varieties, 25.

5 See my Consociational Democracy: Political Accommodation in Segmented Societies (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1974).Google Scholar

6 Morris, Western Political Thought, Vol. 1, 108.

7 Haarhoff, T. J., The Stranger at the Gate (2nd ed.; Oxford: Blackwell, 1948).Google Scholar

8 “The History of Freedom in Christianity,” in Himmelfarb, G. (ed.), Essays on Freedom and Power (London: Thames and Hudson, 1956), 86–87.Google Scholar

9 Galatians 3: 28.

10 The Stranger at the Gate, 111.

11 Leviathan, ed. by C. B. Macpherson (Harmondsworth: Penguin), 82–83. Hobbes himself introduces minor qualifications, but these do not change the main thrust of his argument, nor his influence on later writers.

12 Discourses, Book I, chap. 39, and Book III, chap. 43.

13 Method for the Easy Comprehension of History ed. by Reynolds, B. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1943), chap. 5; Republique, Book 5, chap. 1.Google Scholar

14 Method, 116–17, 122.

15 Essay on “Nationality” (1862) in Essays on Freedom and Power, 160–61.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., 160.

17 See Kieman, V. G., The Lords of Human Kind (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972)Google Scholar and Poliakov, L., The Aryan Myth (London: Chatto Heinemann, 1974).Google Scholar

18 Philosophie de l'ethnisme (Nalinnes-lez-Charieroi: Institut Jules Destree, 1969), 28.Google Scholar

19 On Hindu cultural syncretism there is a stimulating unpublished paper by my colleague Subramaniam, V., “A Non-political Tradition of Cultural Integration of Indian Society,” presented at the Annual Conference of the International Society for the Comparative Study of Civilizations,Milwaukee, 1978.Google Scholar

20 Dyke, Vemon Van, “The Individual, the State, and Ethnic Communities in Political Theory,” World Politics 29 (1977), 369.Google Scholar

21 Ibid. See also his “Human Rights and the Rights of Groups,” American Journal of Political Science 18 (1974), 725–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar