Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:04:10.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Path-Dependence and the Challenges of Institutional Adaptability: The Case of the Niagara Region in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2017

Charles Conteh  and
Diana Panter
Charles Conteh*
Affiliation:
Brock University
Diana Panter*
Affiliation:
Brock University
*
Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines ON, L2S 3A1, email: [email protected]
Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines ON, L2S 3A1 email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper uses the concept of path dependence to explain the challenges and complexities of institutional adaptation at the subnational level. The notion of path dependence is rooted in the well-established research tradition of historical institutionalism, one of the variants of neoinstitutionalism. The academic literature on the new institutionalism, however, has tended to focus on the national level of analysis. But there is a growing recognition of cities and regions as the main engines of socioeconomic change in the current age of seismic global economic perturbation. Their historic and current significance has thus made them arguably more organic units of governance than modern states or supranational regimes. The discussion focuses on the Niagara region in Canada to illustrate the institutional infrastructure of governance underpinning the economic landscape of city-regions and the challenges of reform that such local regions face in an age of unprecedented global socioeconomic change.

Résumé

L'article fait référence au concept de « dépendance au sentier » pour expliquer les défis et les complexités de l'adaptation institutionnelle à l’échelon infranational. La notion de dépendance au sentier est ancrée dans la tradition de recherche bien établie de l'institutionnalisme historique, une des variantes du néo-institutionnalisme. Le néo-institutionnalisme a eu tendance, cependant, à mettre l'accent sur le niveau d'analyse national. Mais on s'accorde à reconnaître de plus en plus le rôle des villes et des régions en tant que principaux moteurs du changement socio-économique dans le contexte actuel des perturbations économiques sismiques qui touchent la planète. Leur importance historique et actuelle a fait d'elles des entités de gouvernance plus dynamiques que les États modernes ou les régimes supranationaux. La discussion porte sur la région du Niagara au Canada afin d'illustrer l'infrastructure institutionnelle de gouvernance sur laquelle repose le paysage économique des villes-régions et les défis auxquels font face ces régions locales pour engager des réformes à l’ère d'une mutation socio-économique mondiale sans précédent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 983 - 1004
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, Ash. 2008. “An Institutionalist Perspective on Regional Economic Development.” In Contemporary Foundations of Space and Place, ed. Martin, Ron. Aldershot UK and Burlington VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Béland, Daniel, and Powell, Martin. 2016. “Continuity and Change in Social Policy.” Social Policy & Administration 50 (2): 129–47.Google Scholar
Bolichowski, J. 2013. “New Region CAO called ‘agent of change.’” St. Catharines Standard. September 18 2013. (June 2015).Google Scholar
Bradford, Neil John and Bramwell, Allison. 2014. Governing urban economies: innovation and inclusion in Canadian city-regions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Gordon L., Feldman, Maryann P. and Gertler, Meric S.. 2000. The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conference Board of Canada. 2014. Mid-Sized Cities Outlook 2014. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada. (July 2014).Google Scholar
Council of Canadian Academies. 2009. Innovation and Business Strategy: Why Canada Falls Short. (July 2013).Google Scholar
Drewes, Torben. 1988. Economic Development in the Niagara Region. Niagara Falls ON: Niagara Region Review Commission.Google Scholar
Florida, Richard L. 2012. The Rise of the Creative Class, Revisited. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. 2014. “Bob Seguin named Region economic development head.” St. Catharines Standard. January 17. (February 2015).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2009. Case study research: Principles and practices. n.p. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Government of Ontario. 2001. Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25. (June 2015).Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44 (5): 936–57.Google Scholar
Houle, R. 2015. “Mixed reaction to call for one Niagara.” St. Catharines Standard, June 24. . (June 2015).Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Benjamin Professor Cashore. 2009. “The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 11 (1): 33–46.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Alan M. and Kent Weaver, R.. 2015. “When Policies Undo Themselves: Self-Undermining Feedback as a Source of Policy Change.” Governance 4: 441.Google Scholar
Kantor, Paul and Nelles, Jen. 2015. “Global city region governance and multicentered development: a North American perspective.” Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy 33 (3): 475–95.Google Scholar
Kay, Adrian. 2005. “A Critique of the Use of Path Dependency in Policy Studies.” Public Administration 83 (3): 553–71.Google Scholar
Keating, Michael and Wilson, Alex. 2014. “Regions with regionalism? The rescaling of interest groups in six European states.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (4): 840–57.Google Scholar
Lecours, André. 2005. New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lightbody, James. 2006. City politics, Canada. Peterborough ON: Broadview.Google Scholar
Lowndes, Vivien. 2010. “The Institutional Approach.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, ed. Marsh, David and Stoker, Gerry. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen Ann. 2010. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
March, James and Olsen, Johan. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” The American Political Science Review 78 (3): 734–49.Google Scholar
McAllister, Mary Louise. 2004. Governing ourselves? The politics of Canadian communities. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jonathan. 2012. “Regional clusters and jobs for inner city workers: the case of transportation, distribution, and logistics.” Community Development 43 (4): 492–511.Google Scholar
Niagara Development Corridor. 2013. “Partners Information.” (January 2015).Google Scholar
Niagara Workforce Planning Board. 2010. The Changing Nature of Manufacturing in Niagara. n.p.: [St. Catharines, Ontario] : Niagara Community Observatory, Brock University Policy.Google Scholar
Peters, Guy. 2009. “Institutionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of British Politics, ed. Flinders, Matthew, Gamble, Andrew, Hale, Colin and Kenny, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, Guy and Pierre, Jon. 1998. “Institutions and Time: Problems of Conceptualization and Explanation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (4): 565–83.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1995. The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist perspective. Cambridge MA: Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul and Skocpol, Theda. 2002. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science.” In Political Science: State of the Discipline, ed. Katznelson, I. and Milner, H.V.. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rast, Joel. 2012. “Why history (still) matters: time and temporality in urban political analysis.” Urban Affairs Review. 1: 3.Google Scholar
Region of Niagara. 1981. “The Regional Business and Industrial Development Sub-Committee. Minutes of Meeting 6–81, June 26, A.34.5.” Thorold ON: Region of Niagara.Google Scholar
Region of Niagara. 2011a. Economic Development Task Force: A Structural Response for Effective and Successful Economic Development for Niagara. St. Catharines ON.Google Scholar
Region of Niagara. 2011b. EDTF1-2011 Report to Council: Economic Development Task Force—Preferred Model. St. Catharines ON.Google Scholar
Region of Niagara. 2011c. “Memorandum: Report CAO 8-2010 Review of Niagara Region Economic Development Function; March 7, 2011.” Thorold ON: Region of Niagara.Google Scholar
Region of Niagara. 2013a. “Niagara Region Population by Municipality, 1996–2011.” Thorold ON. (June 2015).Google Scholar
Region of Niagara. 2012. “Niagara Region Budget Summary 2012.” Thorold ON. (November 2014).Google Scholar
Region of Niagara. 2014. “Economic Development Advisory Panel: Most Recent Agenda.” (June 2015).Google Scholar
Region of Niagara. 2016. Niagara Economic Development. (March 2016).Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. and Weible, Christopher M.. 2015. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sancton, Andrew. 2008. The Limits of Boundaries: Why City-Regions Cannot Be Self-Governing. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Allen J. 2001. Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2011. “Population and Dwelling Counts, for Canada and Census Subdivisions (Municipalities) with 5,000-Plus Population. 2011 and 2006 Census.” Ottawa ON. (2015).Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2006. Census of Population. (January 2015).Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2011. National Household Survey. (June 2015).Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven. 2001. “The New Institutionalism.” In The Encyclopaedia of Democratic Thought, ed. Clarks, Barry and Foweraker, Joe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stone, Clarence N. 2015. “Reflections on Regime Politics.” Urban Affairs Review 51 (1): 101–37.Google Scholar
Storper, Michael. 2013. Keys to the city: How economics, institutions, social interactions, and politics shape development. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical institutionalism in comparative politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1): 369.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. 2010. “Delivery Models of Local Economic Development: An Analysis of Internal and External Models in Ontario.” In Papers in Canadian Economic Development, ed. Parker, P. and Carvalho, E.. Waterloo ON: Economic Development Program, University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
Wolfe, David. 2015. “Innovating in Urban Economies: Economic Transformation and Ontario's Digital Triangle.” Paper presented at the Celebration of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Niagara Region, St. Catharines ON, March 23. (May 2015).Google Scholar
Woods Gordon & Co. and Niagara Regional Municipality. 1980. “Final report: Recommendations.” Economic Development Study Committee. Regional Niagara Economic Development Study. Toronto: Woods Gordon.Google Scholar
Wolfe, D. A. 2010. “The strategic management of core cities: Path dependence and economic adjustment in resilient regions.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 3 (1): 139–52.Google Scholar
Young, Robert and Horak, Martin. 2012. Sites of governance: Multilevel governance and policy making in Canada's big cities. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar