Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:30:10.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monogamous Canadian Citizenship, Constructing Foreignness and the Limits of Harm Discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2016

Megan Gaucher
Megan Gaucher*
Affiliation:
Carleton University
*
Department of Law and Legal Studies, Rm C473 Loeb Building, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa K1S 5B6, email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act (2015) targets immigrants suspected of engaging in polygamy. While polygamy is already illegal in Canada and non-immigrant polygamous arrangements exist within Canadian borders, the framing of polygamy as a foreign practice portrays this familial arrangement as a threat to Canadian national values. Effects on women and children have traditionally provided a convincing argument for state regulation of polygamy; however, the combination of state under—and over—enforcement suggests that relying solely on a harm framework inadequately captures the complexities of state treatment. In this paper, I argue that the state's primary motivations for defending monogamy are not necessarily rooted in the avoidance of harm but in the preservation of a particular type of citizenship.

Résumé

La Loi sur la tolérance zéro face aux pratiques culturelles barbares (2015) cible les immigrants soupçonnés de pratiquer la polygamie. Alors que la polygamie constitue déjà une pratique illégale au Canada et que des arrangements polygames visant des non-immigrants existent à l'intérieur des frontières canadiennes, l'encadrement de la polygamie en tant que pratique étrangère dépeint cet arrangement familial comme une menace aux valeurs nationales canadiennes. Les effets sur les femmes et les enfants ont fourni un argument convaincant en faveur d'une réglementation de la polygamie par l’État ; toutefois, la combinaison d'une application de la loi, « insuffisante » d'une part et « excessive » de l'autre, suggère que le fait de miser uniquement sur un argument de préjudice cerne de façon insuffisante les complexités du traitement de l’État. Dans cet article, j'avance que les motivations premières de l’État pour la défense de la monogamie n'ont pas nécessairement pour fondement d’éviter tout préjudice, mais la préservation d'un type particulier de citoyenneté.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 519 - 538
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abu-Laban, Yasmeen, and Dhamoon, Rita. 2009. “Dangerous (Internal) Foreigners and Nation-Building: The Case of Canada.” International Political Science Review 30 (2): 163–83.Google Scholar
Aiken, Sharryn. 2015. House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration. Evidence. May 7, 2–3.Google Scholar
Alexander, Chris. 2014. “Protecting Canadians from Barbaric Cultural Practices.” Conservative Party of Canada. November. http://www.conservative.ca/cpc/protecting-canadians-from-barbaric-cultural-practices/.Google Scholar
Alexander, Chris. 2015. Canada. House of Commons Debates. March 12, 12025.Google Scholar
Aubin, Robert. 2015. Canada. House of Commons Debates. March 23, 12145.Google Scholar
Baehr, Amy. 2003. “A Feminist Liberal Approach to Hate Crime Legislation.” Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1): 134–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, Beverley. 2012. “Polygamy and Feminist Constitutionalism.” In Feminist Constitutionalism: Global Perspectives, ed. Baines, Beverley, Barak-Erez, Daphne and Kahana, Tsvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Meg and Langdridge, Darren. 2010. Understanding Non-Monogamies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beaman, Lori G. 2014. “Is Polygamy Inherently Harmful?” In Polygamy's Rights and Wrongs: Perspectives on Harm, Family, and Law, ed. Beaman, Lori G. and Calder, Gillian. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Bell, David and Binnie, John. 2000. The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bergen, Candice. 2015. Canada. House of Commons Debates. March 23, 12156.Google Scholar
Blanchette-Lamothe, Lysane. 2015. Canada. House of Commons Debates. February 17, 11273.Google Scholar
Blanchfield, Mike. 2014. “Conservative Bill Tackles Polygamy, Forced Marriage among Immigrants.” Toronto Star, November 5.Google Scholar
Calder, Gillian and Beaman, Lori G.. 2014. Polygamy's Rights and Wrongs: Perspectives on Harm, Family, and Law. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angela. 2005. “How Have Policy Approaches to Polygamy Responded to Women's Experiences and Rights? An International, Comparative Analysis.” Polygamy in Canada: Legal and Society Implications for Women and Children: A Collection of Policy Reports. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angela. 2010. “Bountiful's Plural Marriages.” International Journal of Law in Context 6 (4): 343–61.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angela, Bala, Nicholas, Duvall-Antonacopoulos, Katherine, MacRae, Leslie, Paetsch, Joanne, Bailey, Martha, Baines, Beverley, Amani, Bita, Kaufman, Amy and The Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre. 2005. “Polygamy in Canada: Legal and Social Implications for Women and Children.” Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 2015. Statutes of Canada 2015. C29.Google Scholar
Carter, Sarah. 2008. The Importance of Being Monogamous: Marriage and National Building in Western Canada to 1915. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
Citizenship and Immigration Canada. 2006. “Citizenship and Immigration OP2: Processing Members of the Family Class.” Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
Citizenship and Immigration Canada. 2014. “Protecting Canadian from Barbaric Cultural Practices.” Ottawa: Government of Canada. http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?nid=900399 (May 17, 2015).Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy. 2000. Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Denike, Margaret. 2014. “Polygamy and Race-Thinking: A Genealogy.” In Polygamy's Rights and Wrongs: Perspectives on Harm, Family, and Law, ed. Beaman, Lori G and Calder, Gillian. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Dhamoon, Rita. 2010. “Security Warning: Multiculturalism Alert!” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Multiculturalism, ed. Ivison, Duncan. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Do, Trinh Theresa. 2014. “Harper Won't Fund Abortion Globally Because It's ‘Extremely Divisive.’” CBC News, May 29.Google Scholar
Duncan, Linda. 2015. Canada. House of Commons Debates. February 17, 11289–90.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michael. 1988. The History of Sexuality: The Care of the Self. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Gaucher, Megan. 2014. “Attack of the Marriage Fraudsters! An Examination of the Harper Government's Antimarriage Fraud Campaign.” International Journal of Canadian Studies 50: 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, Lois. 2007. “Rights of Love: The State and Intimate Relationships in Canada and the United States.” Social Politics 14 (2): 155–81.Google Scholar
Harder, Lois. 2009. “Neoliberalism's Agnosticism: Domestic and Immigration Policies in the Model Family in Canada and the United States.” In Post-Neoliberalism in the Americas: An Introduction, ed. Macdonald, Laura and Ruckert, Arne. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harder, Lois. 2015. “Does Sperm Have a Flag? On Biological Relationship and National Membership.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 30 (1): 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 2001. Democracy and the Foreigner. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
James, Roxanne. 2015. Canada. House of Commons Debates. June 12, 15024.Google Scholar
Javed, Noor. 2008a. “GTA's Secret World of Polygamy; As Toronto Mother Describes Her Ordeal, Imam Admits He Has ‘Blessed’ Over 30 Unions.” Toronto Star, May 24.Google Scholar
Javved, Noor. 2008b. “I Do, I Do, I Do. The Last Taboo; Multiple Spouses Are Fine, Just Not in the West.” Toronto Star, May 24.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Brooke. 2015. Dismantling Canada: Stephen Harper's New Conservative Agenda. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Mark. 2014. “Tory Government's New Prostitution Laws Will Likely Target Pimp, Customers and Sex-Trade Traffickers.” National Post (Toronto), April 27.Google Scholar
Klesse, Christian. 2007. The Spectre of Promiscuity: Gay Male and Bisexual Non-Monogamies and Polyamories. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Liu, Lauren. 2015. Canada. House of Commons Debates. March 23, 12148.Google Scholar
Levitz, Stephanie. 2007. “Time to Clear up Polygamy Law, B.C. Told.” Toronto Star, August 2.Google Scholar
Luibhéid, Eithne. 2008. “Sexuality, Migration, and the Shifting Line Between Legal and Illegal Status.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 14 (2–3): 289–315.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayeda, Andrew. 2009. “Tories Prepared to Stand Ground on Polygamy: Documents.” National Post (Toronto), March 24.Google Scholar
Milewski, Terry. 2015. “Niqab Controversy: Stephen Harper, Justin Trudeau Wade into Culture War over the Veil.” CBC News, March 10.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
O'Malley, Kady. 2007. “No Big Love Lost. Is British Columbia Finally Ready to Take on the Polygamists of Bountiful?” Macleans, June 25.Google Scholar
Peck, Richard. 2007. “Report of the Special Prosecutor for Allegations of Misconduct Associated with Bountiful, BC: Summary of Conclusions.” http://www.ag.gov.bc.ca/prosecution-service/media-statements/pdf/07-08Attach_Bountiful-SpProsReport-1Aug2007.pdf (May 6, 2015).Google Scholar
Peritz, Ingrid. 2013. “How Is the Controversial Charter of Values Going over in the Quebec Heartland?” Globe and Mail (Toronto), September 20.Google Scholar
Plummer, Ken. 2003. Intimate Citizenship: Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Pryke, Sam. 1998. “Nationalism and Sexuality: What Are the Issues?” Nationalism and Sexuality 4 (4): 529–46.Google Scholar
Rambukkana, Nathan. 2013. “Affect, Connection and Contradiction: Towards a Comparative Textual Analysis of Writing by and on Polygamous Muslim Women.” Paper presented at Sex Talk @ York II Conference, York University, May 1.Google Scholar
Rambukkana, Nathan. 2015. Fraught Intimacies: Non/Monogamy in the Public Sphere. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Diane. 2000. “Constructing Sexual Citizenship: Theorizing Sexual Rights.” Critical Social Policy 20 (1): 105–35.Google Scholar
Sims, Jinny. 2015. Canada. House of Commons Debates. March 12, 12044.Google Scholar
Status of Women Canada. 2005. “Polygamy in Canada: Legal and Social Implications for Women and Children.” Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
Stevens, Jacqueline. 1999. Reproducing the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Van Walsum, Sarah. 2008. The Family and the Nation: Dutch Family Migration in the Context of Changing Family Norms. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Adam. 2015. Canada. House of Commons Debates. March 23, 12153.Google Scholar
Volpp, Leti. 2000. “Blaming Culture for Bad Behavior.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 12: 89–116.Google Scholar
Watson, Scott D. 2009. The Securitization of Humanitarian Migration: Digging Moats and Sinking Boats. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jeffrey. 1998. “The Sexual Citizen.” Theory, Culture & Society 15 (3–4): 35–52.Google Scholar
Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard. 2008. Polygamy: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Zine, Jasmin. 2012. “The Great Canadian Shar'ia Debate.” In Islam in the Hinterlands: Muslim Cultural Politics in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press. Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Supreme Court of British Columbia. Reference re. Section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada, [2011] BCSC 1588.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Northwest Territories. R. v. Bear's Shin Bone, [1899] 3 C.C.C. 329, 4 Terr. L.R. 173.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Quebec. R. v. John Harris, [1906] 11 C.C.C. 254.Google Scholar