Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T05:49:28.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local Candidate Effects in Canadian Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2018

Benjamin Allen Stevens ,
Md Mujahedul Islam ,
Roosmarijn de Geus ,
Jonah Goldberg ,
John R. McAndrews ,
Alex Mierke-Zatwarnicki ,
Peter John Loewen  and
Daniel Rubenson
Benjamin Allen Stevens
Affiliation:
Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Canadiana Building, 14 Queen's Park Crescent West, Toronto ON, Canada, M5S 3K9
Md Mujahedul Islam
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto ON, Canada, M5S 3G3
Roosmarijn de Geus
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto ON, Canada, M5S 3G3
Jonah Goldberg
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto ON, Canada, M5S 3G3
John R. McAndrews
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto ON, Canada, M5S 3G3
Alex Mierke-Zatwarnicki
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Harvard University, 1737 Cambridge Street, Cambridge MA, 02138USA
Peter John Loewen*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto ON, Canada, M5S 3G3
Daniel Rubenson
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and Public Administration, Ryerson University, Jorgensen Hall 279, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto ON, Canada, M5B 2K3
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What impact do local candidates have on elections in single member district plurality electoral systems? We provide new evidence using data from a large election study carried out during the 2015 Canadian federal election. We improve on the measurement of local candidate effects by asking over 20,000 survey respondents to rate the candidates in their constituency directly. We present three estimates. We find that when all voters are considered together, local candidate evaluations are decisive for approximately 4 per cent of voters. Second, these evaluations are decisive for the outcome of 10 per cent of constituency contests. Third, when models are estimated for each constituency, we find significant evaluation effects for 14 per cent of candidates.

Résumé

Quel est l'impact des candidats locaux sur les élections de district dans les systèmes à scrutin majoritaire? Nous fournissons de nouvelles preuves à l'aide de données tirées d'une vaste étude réalisée lors de l'élection fédérale canadienne de 2015. Nous améliorons la mesure des effets sur les candidats locaux en demandant à plus de 20 000 répondents aux enquêtes d'évaluer directement les candidats dans leur circonscription. Nous présentons trois estimations. Nous constatons que lorsque tous les électeurs sont considérés ensemble, les évaluations des candidats locaux sont décisives pour environ 4% des électeurs. Deuxièmement, ces évaluations sont décisives pour le résultat de 10% des élections. Troisièmement, lorsque les modèles sont estimés circonscription par circonscription, nous constatons des effets significatifs de l'évaluation pour 14% des candidats.

Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 83 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher H. 2002. “Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART.” Annual Review of Political Science 5 (1): 423–50.Google Scholar
Ahler, Douglas J., Citrin, Jack, Dougal, Michael C. and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2017. “Face Value? Experimental Evidence that Candidate Appearance Influences Electoral Choice.” Political Behavior 39 (1): 77–102.Google Scholar
Arzheimer, Kai and Evans, Jocelyn. 2012. “Geolocation and voting: Candidate-voter distance effects on party choice in the 2010 UK general election in England.” Political Geography 31: 301–10.Google Scholar
Arzheimer, Kai and Evans, Jocelyn. 2014. “Candidate geolocation and voter choice in the 2013 English County Council elections.” Research and Politics July-September: 1–9.Google Scholar
Barton, Jared, Castillo, Marco and Petrie, Ragan. 2014. “What Persuades Voters? A Field Experiment on Political Campaigning.” The Economic Journal 124 (574): F293–F326.Google Scholar
Blais, André and Daoust, Jean-François. 2017. “What do voters do when they like a local candidate from another party?” Canadian Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 1103–09.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Dobrzynska, Agnieszka, Nevitte, Neil and Nadeau, Richard. 2003. “Does the Local Candidate Matter? Candidate Effects in the Canadian Election of 2000.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 657–64.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rosie and Cowley, Philip. 2014. “What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment.” Political Studies 62 (4): 745–65.Google Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth. 2002. “The Politics of Tecumseh Corners: Canadian Political Parties as Franchise Organizations.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 723–45.Google Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth and Young, Lisa. 2012. “The Local Underpinnings of Electoral Competition in Canada, 1979–2008.” Canadian Political Science Review 6 (2–3):227–36.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne C. and Whiteley, Paul. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., LeDuc, Lawrence, Jenson, Jane and Pammett, Jon. 1979. Political Choice in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Coletto, David, Jansen, Harold J. and Young, Lisa. 2011. “Stratarchical Party Organization and Party Finance in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 111–36.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Robert. 1971. “The Impact of the Local Candidate in Canadian Federal Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 4 (2): 287–90.Google Scholar
Denver, David, Hands, Gordon and MacAllister, Iain. 2004. “The Electoral Impact of Constituency Campaigning in Britain, 1992–2001.” Political Studies 52 (2): 289–306.Google Scholar
Dewan, Torun, Humphreys, Macartan and Rubenson, Daniel. 2014. “The Elements of Political Persuasion: Content, Contact and Cue.” The Economic Journal 124 (574): F257–92.Google Scholar
Eagles, Munroe. 1993. “Money and Votes in Canada: Campaign Spending and Parliamentary Election Outcomes, 1984 and 1988.” Canadian Public Policy 19 (4): 432–49.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, Samuel James. 1964. Political parties: A behavioral analysis. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Enos, Ryan D. and Hersh, Eitan D.. 2015. “Party Activists as Campaign Advertisers: The Ground Campaign as a Principal-Agent Problem.” American Political Science Review 109 (2): 252–78.Google Scholar
Evans, Jocelyn, Arzheimer, Kai, Campbell, Rosie and Cowley, Philip. 2017. “Candidate localness and voter choice in the 2015 general elections in England.” Political Geography 59: 61–71.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Green, Donald P.. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94 (3): 653–63.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nevitte, Neil and Nadeau, Richard. 2002. “Priming and Campaign Context: Evidence from Recent Canadian Elections.” Working paper.Google Scholar
Heintzman, D. Keith. 1991. “Electoral competition, campaign expenditure and incumbency advantage.” Issues in Party and Election Finance in Canada 5: 97–156.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Robert and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, William P. 1982. “Does the Candidate Make a Difference? The Macro-Politics and Micro-Politics of Getting Elected.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 15 (4): 755–82.Google Scholar
Johnston, Ronald J., Pattie, Charles J., Cutts, David, Fieldhouse, Edward and Fisher, Justin. 2011. “Local Campaign Spending at the 2010 General Election and Its Impact: Exploring What Wider Regulation has Revealed.” The Political Quarterly 82 (2): 169–92.Google Scholar
Johnston, Ronald J. 1987. Money and Votes: Constituency campaign spending and election results. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Johnston, Ronald J., Pattie, Charles J. and Johnston, L.C.. 1989. “The impact of constituency spending on the result of the 1987 British general election.” Electoral Studies 8 (2): 143–55.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A. and Banducci, Susan A.. 2007. “Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Old Democracies.” Party Politics 13 (2): 217–34.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A., Banducci, Susan A. and Bowler, Shaun. 2008. “Getting Out the Vote: Party Mobilization in a Comparative Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 91–112.Google Scholar
Keeter, Scott. 1987. “The Illusion of Intimacy: Television and the Role of Candidate Personal Qualities in Voter Choice.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51 (3): 344–58.Google Scholar
Krashinsky, Michael and Milne, William J.. 1983. “Some Evidence on the Effect of Incumbency in Ontario Provincial Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 16 (3): 489–500.Google Scholar
Krashinsky, Michael and Milne, William J.. 1985. “Additional Evidence on the Effect of Incumbency in Canadian Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 18 (1): 155–65.Google Scholar
Krashinsky, Michael and Milne, William J.. 1986. “The Effect of Incumbency in the 1984 Federal and 1985 Ontario Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 19 (2): 337–43.Google Scholar
Krebs, Timothy B. 2001. “Political Experience and Fundraising in City Council Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 82 (3): 536–51.Google Scholar
Loewen, Peter John, de Miguel, Carolina and Heroux-Legault, Maxime. 2015. “Nationalism and Ethnic Heterogeneity: The Importance of Local Context for Nationalist Party Vote Choice.” Electoral Studies 39:129–41.Google Scholar
Loewen, Peter, Daniel Rubenson, John and Koop, Royce. 2018. “Local Parliament Project 2015 Canadian Election Survey.” Harvard Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/DACHKPGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Michael. 1987. “Electoral evaluations of candidates in Irish general elections 1948–82.” Irish Political Studies 2 (1): 65–76.Google Scholar
Marsh, Michael. 2004. “None of that post-modern stuff around here: Grassroots campaigning in the 2002 Irish General Election.” British Elections & Parties Review 14 (1): 245–67.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Matthew. 1993. “Television's Frames in the 1988 Canadian Election.” Canadian Journal of Communication 18 (2): 149–71.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Matthew. 1996. “The Media and Interpersonal Communications: The Priming of Issues, Leaders, and Party Identification.” The Journal of Politics 58 (1): 112–25.Google Scholar
Ohr, Dieter. 2011. “Changing Patterns in Political Communication.” In Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, ed. Aarts, Kees, Blais, André and Schmitt, Hermann. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pattie, Charles J. and Johnston, Ronald J.. 2003. “Hanging on the Telephone? Doorstep and Telephone Canvassing at the British General Election of 1997.” British Journal of Political Science 33 (2): 303–22.Google Scholar
Pattie, Charles J., Johnston, Ronald J. and Fieldhouse, Edward A.. 1995. “Winning the Local Vote: The Effectiveness of Constituency Campaign Spending in Great Britain, 1983–1992.” American Political Science Review 89 (4): 969–83.Google Scholar
Roy, Jason and Alcantara, Christopher. 2015. “The Candidate Effect: Does the Local Candidate Matter?” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 25 (2): 195–214.Google Scholar
Schoen, Harald and Schumann, Siegfried. 2007. “Personality Traits, Partisan Attitudes and Voting Behavior. Evidence from Germany.” Political Psychology 28 (4): 471–98.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Søberg, Valdini, Melody Ellis and Suominen, Kati. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 437–49.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jeffrey. 2002. “This Turncoat MP Should Be Recalled.” The Globe and Mail. January 29, 2002, A17.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2010. “Effect of Local Ties on Electoral Success and Parliamentary Behaviour: The Case of Estonia.” Party Politics 16 (2): 215–35.Google Scholar
Trimble, Linda and Sampert, Shannon. 2004. “Who's in the Game? The Framing of Election 2000 by The Globe and Mail and The National Post.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 51–71.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F. and Seyd, Patrick. 2003. “How to win a landslide by really trying: The effects of local campaigning on voting in the 1997 British general election.” Electoral Studies 22 (2): 301–24.Google Scholar
Wielhouwer, Peter W. and Lockerbie, Brad. 1994. “Party Contacting and Political Participation, 1952–90.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 211–29.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Allen Stevens et al. supplementary material

Appendices A-B

Download Allen Stevens et al. supplementary material(File)
File 129.8 KB