Article contents
Integration before Assimilation: Immigration, Multiculturalism and the Canadian Polity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2009
Abstract
As a strategy of immigrant inclusion, official multiculturalism in Canada is based on the premise that national integration is possible, even preferable, without assimilation. This article considers whether such an approach can be successful. Drawing on a qualitative study of Lao immigrants in Ontario, it is suggested that newcomers can in fact be disposed to high levels of political commitment, specific mechanisms of political assimilation aside, as a result of the process of immigration itself. At least in the short term, though perhaps mainly in the short term, the Canadian political order does not seem to suffer for lack of an assimilative emphasis.
Résumé
Comme stratégie d'inclusion des immigrants, le multiculturalisme au Canada est construit sur la prémisse voulant que l'intégration nationale soit possible, sinon préférable, sans assimilation. Cet article examine si cette démarche peut réussir. À partir d'une étude qualitative effectuée auprès d'immigrants Laotiens en Ontario, cette étude propose que les nouveaux venus peuvent, en fait, être enclin d'afficher un niveaux élévé d'engagement politique compte-tenu du processus d'immigration lui-même lorsque ne sont pas considérés les mécanismes d'assimilation politique. Au moins à court terme, voire même principalement à court terme, l'ordre politique canadien ne semble pas souffrir de l'absence de pressions assimilationnistes.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 711 - 736
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1997
References
1 Report of the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism, Vol. 4 (Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1969), 5, 7.
2 Bell, David V. J., The Roots of Disunity: A Study of Canadian Political Culture (2nd ed.; Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar; Bibby, Reginald W., Mosaic Madness: The Poverty and Potential of Life in Canada (Toronto: Stoddart, 1990)Google Scholar; Bercuson, David Jay and Cooper, Barry, Deconfederation: Canada without Quebec (Toronto: Key Porter, 1991)Google Scholar; Chodos, Robert, Murray, Rae and Hamovitch, Eric, The Unmaking of Canada: The Hidden Theme in Canadian History since 1945 (Toronto: J. Lorimer, 1991)Google Scholar; Doern, G. Bruce and Purchase, Byrne B., eds., Canada at Risk: Canadian Public Policy in the 1990s (Toronto: C. D. Howe Institute, 1991)Google Scholar; Webber, Jeremy, Reimagining Canada: Language, Community and the Canadian Constitution (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1994)Google Scholar; and Weaver, R. Kent, ed., The Collapse of Canada? (Washington: The Brookings Institute, 1992).Google Scholar
3 Birch, A. H., Nationalism and National Integration (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989), 178.Google Scholar
4 Tuohy, Carolyn J., Policy and Politics in Canada: Institutionalized Ambivalence (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992), 5.Google Scholar
5 Carty, R. Kenneth and Ward, W. Peter, “The Making of a Canadian Political Citizenship,” in Carty, R. Kenneth and Ward, W. Peter, eds., National Politics and Community in Canada (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1986), 76–77.Google Scholar
6 Taylor, Charles, “Alternative Futures: Legitimacy, Identity and Alienation in Late Twentieth Century Canada,” in Cairns, Alan and Williams, Cynthia, eds., Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985), 221.Google Scholar
7 “For Want of Glue: A Survey of Canada,” Economist, June 29, 1991, 19.
8 Canada, House of Commons, Standing Committee on Multiculturalism, Multiculturalism: Building the Canadian Mosaic (Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1987), 47.Google Scholar
9 Finestone, Sheila, “I Don't Enjoy Neil Bissoondath,” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), February 7, 1995.Google Scholar
10 Teske, Raymond H. C. and Nelson, Bardin H., “Acculturation and Assimilation: A Clarification,” American Ethnologist 1 (1974), 359–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 See, for example, Bashevkin, Sylvia, True Patriot Love: The Politics of Canadian Nationalism (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1991), 1–28.Google Scholar
12 Morton, W. L., The Canadian Identity (2nd ed.; Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1972), 85.Google Scholar
13 Ibid., 111.
14 See, for example, Young, Crawford, “The Dialectics of Cultural Pluralism: Concept and Reality,” in Young, Crawford, ed., The Rising Tide of Cultural Pluralism: The Nation-State at Bay? (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993), 3–35.Google Scholar
15 See, for instance, Kaplan, William, “Who Belongs? Changing Concepts of Citizenship and Nationality,” in Kaplan, William, ed., Belonging: The Meaning and Future of Canadian Citizenship (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1993), 255–56.Google Scholar
16 See, for example, Tully, James, “The Crisis of Identification: The Case of Canada,” Political Studies 42 (1994), 76–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Paquet, Gilles, “The Political Philosophy of Multiculturalism,” in Berry, J. W. and LaPonce, J. A., eds., Ethnicity and Culture in Canada: The Research Landscape (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994), 60–80Google Scholar; and also Webber, Reimagining Canada, 185–206.
17 Fleras, Augie and Elliot, Jean Leonard, Multiculturalism in Canada: The Challenge of Diversity (Scarborough: Nelson Canada, 1992), 125Google Scholar (emphasis in original).
18 For instance, Pal, Leslie A., Interests of State: The Politics of Language, Multiculturalism and Feminism in Canada (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
19 Bissoondath, Neil, Selling Illusions: The Cult of Multiculturalism in Canada (Toronto: Penguin, 1994), 116.Google Scholar
20 See, for example, Smith, Anthony D., The Ethnic Origins of Nations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986), 150–54Google Scholar; Weiner, Myron, “Political Integration and Political Development,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 358 (1965), 55–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Hartz, Louis, The Founding of New Societies (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1964), 14.Google Scholar For the American perspective, see Harles, John C., Politics in the Lifeboat: Immigrants and the American Democratic Order (Boulder: Westview, 1993), 51–63.Google Scholar
21 Mill, John Stuart, Considerations on Representative Government (1867; rpt. London: J. M. Dent, 1972), 362.Google Scholar
22 Ibid., 363–64.
23 On qualitative methodology in general and on the intensive interview approach in particular, see John, and Lofland, Lyn H., Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Analysis (2nd ed.; Belmont: Wadsworth, 1984)Google Scholar; also Zisk, Betty H., Political Research: A Methodological Sampler (Lexington, D.C.: Heath, 1981).Google Scholar The interview sessions took place in southern Ontario during the summer of 1992. Respondents were selected by means of a snowball sample. In an effort to keep the testimony more representative than exhaustive, only 27 of the 30 interviewees are cited in the present essay.
24 According to statistics compiled by Employment and Immigration Canada, between 1979 and 1990, 16,297 immigrants from Laos were resettled in Canada, over 5,800 of those in Ontario alone ( Employment and Immigration Canada, Immigration Statistics [Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada, 1989], 20Google Scholar; and Employment and Immigration Canada, Annual Report, 1990–1991 [Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada, 1991], 50).Google Scholar These figures do not strictly distinguish individuals on the basis of ethnicity—rather, all individuals whose origins are somewhere in Laos are regarded for statistical purposes as Lao. Neither do they differentiate “highland” Lao—most prominently Hmong and Mien tribespeople—from “lowland,” or ethnic, Lao. It is the political orientations of this latter contingent, historically the politically and culturally dominant group in Laos, that the present study explores.
25 Durkheim, Emile, The Division of Labor in Society (1893; rpt.; New York: The Free Press, 1984), 60–61.Google Scholar
26 According to the 1991 Census, 10,000 Lao are Canadian citizens—more than 67 per cent of the total Lao population in Canada. The Lao also appear to obtain citizenship at a faster pace than do immigrants in general. For example, among individuals receiving citizenship in 1991, the Lao waited an average of 5.07 years before being naturalized; the average interval for all immigrants was 7.1 years ( Multiculturalism and Citizenship Canada, Canadian Citizenship Statistics, 1991 [Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada, 1991], 22).Google Scholar
27 On the affective potential of Canadian citizenship, see Kaplan, “Who Belongs?”; and also Frideres, James S. et al., “Becoming Canadian: Citizen Acquisition and National Identity,” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism 14 (1987), 105–21.Google Scholar
28 See Deutsch, Karl, The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control (New York: The Free Press, 1966), 126Google Scholar; and Shils, Edward, Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975), 4–5, 66ff.Google Scholar
29 The fact that the support of the Lao for the national political community might be more complete than for the Canadian government or for specific occupants of political office is consistent with findings on the political support of the Canadian citizenry at large. See Kornberg, Alan and Clarke, Harold D., Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), esp. 107ff. and 254–55.Google Scholar
30 The seminal work in this regard is Ravenstein, E. G., “The Laws of Migration,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (1889), 241–301.Google Scholar
31 See Heisler, Barbara Schmitter, “Immigrant Settlement and the Structure of Emergent Immigrant Communities in Western Europe,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 485 (1986), 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Other research has noted that immigrants tend to have a special affinity for their country of adoption. In circa 1970s survey data, for example, David Elkins found that feelings of “warmth” towards Canada were the least strong among native-born Canadians, stronger among long-term immigrants (those arriving before 1945) and strongest of all among short-term immigrants (those arriving after 1945). See Elkins, David and Simeon, Richard, Small Worlds: Provinces and Parties in Canadian Political Life (Toronto: Methuen, 1980), 12–13.Google Scholar
33 “Seminar”—the name given by the LPDR to labour re-education camps.
34 See the discussion in Adelman, Howard, “Canadian Refugee Policy in the Postwar Period: An Analysis,” in Adelman, Howard, ed., Refugee Policy: Canada and the United States (Toronto: York Lanes Press, 1991), 210–14.Google Scholar Also see Hawkins, Freda, Critical Years in Immigration: Canada and Australia Compared (2nd ed.; Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1991), 174–85.Google Scholar
35 Shils, Center and Periphery, 66.
36 See, for example, Bibby, Mosaic Madness, 158ff.; Schwartz, Mildred A., Public Opinion and Canadian Identity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967), 248–52Google Scholar; and Banting, Keith, The Welfare State and Canadian Federalism (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1982), 119.Google Scholar
37 See, for example, the Economic Council of Canada, New Faces in the Crowd: Economic and Social Impacts of Immigration (Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada, 1991), 31ff.Google Scholar
38 See the discussion in Dreidger, Leo, The Ethnic Factor: Identity in Diversity (Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1989), 50–65Google Scholar; and also Gordon, Milton, Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion and National Origins (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
39 See Inglehart, Ronald, Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990), 56ff.Google Scholar
40 Louis Melosky, National Director, Canadian Multiculturalism Council, as quoted in Cairns, Alan C., “Political Science, Ethnicity and the Canadian Constitution,” in Shugarman, David P. and Whitaker, Reg, eds., Federalism and Political Community: Essays in Honour of Donald Smiley (Peterborough: Broadview Press, 1989), 123.Google Scholar
- 27
- Cited by