Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:41:57.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gendering Public Policy or Rationalizing Gender? Strategic Interventions and GBA+ Practice in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2017

Francesca Scala  and
Stephanie Paterson
Francesca Scala*
Affiliation:
Concordia University
Stephanie Paterson*
Affiliation:
Concordia University
*
Department of Political Science, Concordia University, 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montreal QC, H3 G 1M8, email: [email protected]
Department of Political Science, Concordia University, 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montreal, Quebec H3 G 1M8, email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The debate surrounding the transformative potential of gender mainstreaming has revived concerns of co-optation of equality work and resistance first expressed by early feminist public administration scholars. In this article, we explore how gender analysts exercised their agency and carved out spaces within the bureaucracy to articulate and advance a gender focus in policy work. Employing discursive, institutional and relational strategies, gender analysts simultaneously used and pushed back against hierarchical bureaucratic discourses as they operationalized Gender-Based Analysis Plus (GBA+) in the federal public bureaucracy. These micro-level acts of resistance, on their own, do not lead to social transformation. However, by creating spaces for feminist knowledge and activism within the state, these local strategies can contribute to the broader feminist agenda.

Résumé

Le débat entourant le potentiel transformateur de l’égalité des sexes a ravivé les inquiétudes de cooptation du travail en matière d’égalité des sexes et de la résistance exprimée en tout premier lieu par les premiers spécialistes féministes de l’administration publique. Dans cet article, nous examinons comment les analystes des questions de genre ont exercé leur potentiel et créé des espaces dans l’appareil bureaucratique afin d’articuler et de faire avancer l’égalité entre les sexes dans le travail sur les politiques. En employant des stratégies discursives, institutionnelles et relationnelles, les analystes des questions de genre ont utilisé et contesté simultanément les discours bureaucratiques hiérarchiques en traduisant en termes opérationnels l’Analyse comparative entre les sexes plus (ACS+) dans l’appareil public fédéral. Ces actes de résistance à un micro-niveau ne conduisent pas, en eux-mêmes, à une transformation sociale. Toutefois, en créant des espaces propices à la connaissance féministe et à l’activisme au sein de l’État, ces stratégies locales peuvent contribuer au plan d’action féministe plus élargi.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 50 , Special Issue 2: Finding Feminism , June 2017 , pp. 427 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank the journal's anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

References

Bacchi, Carol Lee and Eveline, Joan. 2010. Mainstreaming Politics, Gendering Practices and Feminist Theory. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
Burt, Sandra and Hardman, Sonya L.. 2001. “The Case of Disappearing Targets: The Liberals and Gender Equality.” In How Ottawa Spends, 2001–2002: Power in Transition, ed. Pal, Leslie. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2002. Gendering Government: Feminist Engagement with the State in Australia and Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Desai, Manesha. 2002. “Transnational Solidarity: Women's Agency, Structural Adjustment, and Globalization.” In Women's Activism and Globalization: Linking Local Struggles and Transnational Politics, ed. Naples, Nancy A. and Desai, Manesha. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Einarsdóttir, Thorgerdur. 2003. “Challenging the Slow Motion of Gender Equality—The Case of Iceland.” Presented at Gender and Power in the New Europe, the 5th European Feminist Research Conference, Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Hester. 1995. “The Australian Femocratic Experiment: A Feminist Case for Bureaucracy.” In Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women's Movement, ed. Ferree, Myra Marx and Martin, Patricia Yancey. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Hester. 1996. Inside Agitators: Australian Femocrats and the State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Eyben, Rosalind. 2012. “Preface.” In Strategies of Feminist Bureaucrats: United Nations Experiences, ed. Sandler, Joanne and Rao, Aruna. IDS working paper 397. London: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Kathy E. 1984. The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Findlay, Tammy. 2015. Femocratic Administration: Gender, Governance and Democracy in Ontario. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Findlay, Sue. 1997. “Institutionalizing Feminist Politics: Learning from the Struggles for Equal Pay in Ontario.” In Women and the Canadian Welfare State: Challenges and Change, ed. Evans, Patricia M. and Wekerle, Gerda R.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Grace, Joan. 1997. “Sending Mixed Messages: Gender-Based Analysis and the ‘Status of Women.’” Canadian Public Administration 40 (4): 582–98.Google Scholar
Hankivsky, Olena. 2005. “Gender vs. Diversity Mainstreaming: A Preliminary Examination of the Role and Transformative Potential of Feminist Theory.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 38 (4): 977–1001.Google Scholar
Hankivsky, Olena. 2008. “Gender mainstreaming in Canada and Australia: A comparative analysis.” Policy and Society 27 (1): 69–81.Google Scholar
Hankivsky, Olena. 2012. “The Lexicon of Mainstreaming Equality: Gender Based Analysis (GBA), Gender and Diversity Analysis (GDA) and Intersectionality Based Analysis (IBA).” Canadian Political Science Review 6 (2/3): 171–83.Google Scholar
Kirner, Joan and Rayner, Moira. 1999. The Women's Power Handbook. Victoria AU: Viking, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Malloy, Jonathan. 2003. Between Colliding Worlds: The Ambiguous Existence of Government Agencies for Aboriginal and Women's Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, Dorothy E. and Mazur, Amy G.. 2010. The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
McNutt, Kathleen. 2010. “An Integrated Approach to Gender Equality: From Gender-Based Analysis to Gender Mainstreaming.” Working paper series. Johnson Shoyama Graduate School, University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
Meier, Petra and Celis, Karen. 2011. “Sowing the Seeds of Its Own Failure: Implementing the Concept of Gender Mainstreaming.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 18 (4): 469–89.Google Scholar
Meyerson, Debra E. and Scully, Maureen A.. 1995. “Crossroads Tempered Radicalism and the Politics of Ambivalence and Change.” Organization Science 6 (5): 585–600.Google Scholar
Miller, Carol and Ravazi, Sharhra, eds. 1998. Missionaries and Mandarins: Feminist Engagement with Development Institutions. London: UNRISD.Google Scholar
Newman, Janet. 2012. Working the Spaces of Power: Activism, Neoliberalism and Gendered Labour. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Office of the Auditor General of Canada. 2009. Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons (Spring 2009): Gender-based Analysis. ch. l. Ottawa: OAG.Google Scholar
Parsons, Elizabeth and Priola, Vincenza. 2012. “Agents for Change and Changed Agents: The Micro-politics of Change and Feminism in the Academy.” Gender, Work & Organization, 20 (5): 580–98Google Scholar
Paterson, Stephanie. 2010. “What's the Problem with Gender-Based Analysis? Gender Mainstreaming Policy and Practice in Canada: The Problem with Gender-Based Analysis.” Canadian Public Administration 53 (3): 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, Pauline and Vickers, Jill. 2001. Women's Movements and State Feminism: Integrating Diversity into Public Policy. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.Google Scholar
Rankin, Pauline and Wilcox, Krista. 2004. “De-Gendering Engagements? Gender Mainstreaming, Women's Movements and the Canadian Federal State.” Atlantis 29 (1): 52–60.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 1996. “Femocrats and Ecorats: Women's Policy Machinery in Australia, Canada and New Zealand.” Occasional paper no. 6. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
Shore, Cris. 2008. “Audit Culture and Liberal Governance: Universities and the Politics of Accountability.” Anthropological Theory 8 (3): 278–98.Google Scholar
Squires, Judith. 2007. The New Politics of Gender Equality. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Stivers, Camilla. 2002. Gender Images in Public Administration: Legitimacy and the Administrative State. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Swan, Elaine and Fox, Steve. 2010. “Playing the Game: Strategies of Resistance and Co-optation in Diversity Work.” Gender, Work & Organization 17 (5): 567–89.Google Scholar
Status of Women Canada. 2016. Gender-based Analysis Plus. http://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/gba-acs/index-en.html (March 8, 2017).Google Scholar
Teghtsoonian, Katherine. 2000. “Gendering Policy Analysis in the Government of British Columbia: Strategies, Possibilities and Constraints.” Studies in Political Economy 61 (Spring): 105–27.Google Scholar
Thomas, Robyn and Davies, Annette. 2005. “Theorizing the Micro-politics of Resistance: New Public Management and Managerial Identities in the UK Public Services.” Organization Studies 26 (5): 683–706.Google Scholar
Townsend, Thomas and Kunimoto, Bob. 2009. Capacity, Collaboration and Culture: The Future of the Policy Research Function in the Government of Canada. Ottawa: Government of Canada - Policy Research Initiative.Google Scholar
Verloo, Mieke and Lombardo, Emanuela, E. 2007. “Contested gender equality and policy variety in Europe: Introducing a critical frame analysis approach.” Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality. A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe, ed, Verloo, Mieke. Budapest/New York: CEU Press.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia. 2011. The Future of Feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Young, Shaun P. 2013. Evidence-Based Policy-Making in Canada. Don Mills ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar