Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:05:45.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender and Political Activity in Canada, 1965–1984*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Barry J. Kay ,
Ronald D. Lambert ,
Steven D. Brown  and
James E. Curtis
Barry J. Kay
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Ronald D. Lambert
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
Steven D. Brown
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
James E. Curtis
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This note addresses questions relating to the level of women's political activity and specific obstacles that restrict it. The work of Black and McGlen, showing a decrease in the traditional participation differences between Canadian men and women, is replicated over an expanded series of six national election studies. The results challenge the suggestion that there has been a decline in difference over time, and there is an attempt to account for this lingering distinction between the genders. Data are presented which indicate that the presence of children in the home has a much more constraining impact upon women's political activity than upon that of men.

Résumé

Cette note traite de questions liées a l'activité politique des femmes et aux obstacles qui la restreignent. On a repris, dans une série élargie de six études portant sur les élections nationales, les travaux de Black et McGlen qui indiquent que les écarts traditionnels entre la participation politique des hommes et des femmes au Canada tendent à s'amenuiser. Or les résultats de ces études remettent en question l'idée que la différence entre les sexes diminue avec le temps et les auteurs essaient d'expliquer pourquoi l'écart tend à se perpétuer. Les données indiquent aussi que la présence d'enfants au foyer a des conséquences beaucoup plus contraignantes pour l'activité politique des femmes que pour celle des hommes.

Type
Note
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 851 - 863
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1987

References

1 Mishler, William, Political Participation in Canada (Toronto: Macmillan, 1979), 102–04Google Scholar; Loon, Rick Van, “Political Participation in Canada: The 1965 Election,” this JOURNAL 3 (1970), 308Google Scholar; Lane, Robert, Political Life (Glencoe, III.: Free Press, 1959), 209–15Google Scholar; Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren and Stokes, Donald, The American Voter (New York: John Wiley, 1960), 483–93Google Scholar; Verba, Sidney and Nie, Norman, Participation in America (New York: Harper and Row, 1972), 95–102Google Scholar; Milbrath, Lester, Political Participation (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965), 133–37.Google Scholar

2 Jaros, Dean, Socialization to Politics (New York: Praeger, 1973), 44–45Google Scholar; Hess, Robert and Torney, Judith, The Development of Political Attitudes in Children (Chicago: Aldine, 1967), 199–222Google Scholar; Lane, , Political Life, 120–22Google Scholar; Greenstein, Fred, Children and Politics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965), 107–27.Google Scholar

3 Hess, and Torney, , The Development of Political Attitudes in Children, 214Google Scholar.

4 Easton, David and Dennis, Jack, Children in the Political System (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969), 342–43Google Scholar; Orum, Anthony, Cohen, Roberta, Grassmuck, Sheri, and Orum, Amy, “Sex, Socialization and Politics,” American Sociological Review 39 (1974), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Campbell, et al., The American Voter, 484–85Google Scholar.

6 Andersen, Kristi, “Working Women and Political Participation, 1952–1972,” American Journal of Political Science 19 (1975), 439–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Verba, Sidney, The Civic Culture (Boston: Little, Brown, 1965), 333–34.Google Scholar

8 Andersen, “Working Women and Political Participation, 1952–1972,” 447–50.

9 Welch, Susan, “Women as Political Animals? A Test of Some Explanations for Male-Female Political Participation Differences,” American Journal of Political Science 21 (1977), 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Pomper, Gerald, Voter's Choice (New York: Dodd Mead, 1975), 69–76.Google Scholar

11 Verba, and Nie, , Participation in America, 101Google Scholar.

12 Lansing, Marjorie, “The American Woman: Voter and Activist,” in Jaquette, Jane S. (ed.), Women in Politics (New York: John Wiley, 1974), 5–24.Google Scholar

13 Black, Jerome H. and McGlen, Nancy E., “Male-Female Political Involvement Differentials in Canada, 1965–1974,” this JOURNAL 12 (1979), 472.Google Scholar

14 Parenti, Michael, “Ethnic Politics and the Persistence of Ethnic Identification,” American Political Science Review 61 (1967), 717–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Vickers, Jill and Brodie, Janine, “Canada,” in Lovenduski, Joni and Hills, Jill (eds.), The Politics of the Second Electorate (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981), 52–82.Google Scholar

16 Black and McGlen, “Male-Female Political Involvement Differentials in Canada, 1965–1974,” 478.

17 Ibid., 487–89.

18 Ibid., 473–75.

19 The 1965 National Election Study was co-ordinated by John Meisel, Maurice Pinard, Peter Regenstreif and Mildred Schwartz. The 1968 study was conducted by John Meisel, and the 1974, 1979 and 1980 studies were undertaken by Harold Clarke, Jane Jenson, Lawrence LeDuc and Jon Pammett.

20 This table uses the 1965 questionnaire as a base, and replicates only those items from other surveys that are similarly worded.

21 One possible interpretation which can probably be put aside is that the discrepancies were due to differences in question wording, since that would not explain the largest deviations.

22 Even where there is similarity in content, the 1965 questions tend to be worded differently from those in subsequent years. Given this and the small number of participation items used in 1968, the most useful comparisons to be made occur in the 1974–1984 period, except for 1980 when the scope of the study was scaled down substantially. It should also be noted that in the 1974 study the battery of participation items was half-sampled.

23 Black and McGlen, “Male-Female Political Involvement Differentials in Canada, 1965–1974,” 494.

24 Andersen, “Working Women and Political Participation, 1952–1972,” 442–43; Welch, “Women as Political Animals? A Test of Some Explanations for Male-Female Political Participation Differences,” 720–21.

25 Ibid., 722-23.

26 Ibid., 724-25.

27 Lee, Marcia, “Why Few Women Hold Public Office: Democracy and Sexual Roles,” Political Science Quarterly 91 (1976), 297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Kirkpatrick, Jeane J., Political Women (New York: Basic Books, 1974), 234–37.Google Scholar

28 McGlen, Nancy E., “The Impact of Parenthood on Political Participation,” Western Political Quarterly 33 (1980), 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Sapiro, Virginia, The Political Integration of Women: Roles, Socialization and Politics (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1983), 84–139.Google Scholar

30 Lynn, Naomi and Flora, Cornelia, “Motherhood and Political Participation: The Changing Sense of Self,” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 1 (1973), 91–103.Google Scholar

31 Sapiro, , The Political Integration of Women, 138Google Scholar.

32 Lynn, Naomi and Flora, Cornelia B., “Societal Punishment and Aspects of Female Political Participation: 1972 National Convention Delegates,” in Githens, Marianne and Prestage, Jewel (eds.), A Portrait of Marginality: The Political Behavior of the American Woman (New York: David McKay, 1977), 142–43.Google Scholar

33 Brodie, Janine, Women and Politics in Canada (Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1985), 85.Google Scholar

34 Wilson, Susannah J., Women, the Family and the Economy (Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1982), 124Google Scholar; and Bashevkin, Sylvia B., Toeing the Lines: Women and Party Politics in English Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985), 158.Google Scholar

35 This expanded category comprised 32 per cent of the sample, as compared to only 18 per cent when it was limited to the parents of preschoolers. As one might expect, the presence of secondary school-aged children had much less impact upon distinctive behaviour by their parents.

36 Jennings, M. Kent, “Another Look at the Life Cycle and Political Participation,” American Journal of Political Science 23 (1979), 755–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 Flora, Cornelia B. and Lynn, Naomi, “Women and Political Socialization: Considerations of the Impact of Motherhood,” in Jaquette, Jane S. (ed.), Women in Politics, 40Google Scholar; and Sapiro, , The Political Integration of Women, 138Google Scholar.

38 A multivariate technique, Multiple Classification Analysis (MCA), was also applied to the data to permit an assessment of the impact of children and employment upon political activity while simultaneously taking into account the effects of education, income, age, marital status and gender. This analysis indicated the presence of children still tended to have stronger relationships with the participation variables than did employment, but only in limited situations did parenthood stand independently as a significant political constraint. In summary, the effect of other factors, notably education, age and gender, is evident in the crosstabular data relating the parental and employment roles to political participation, and further multivariate analysis is warranted.