Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:53:15.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Duplicative or Complementary? The Relationship between Policy Consulting and Internal Policy Analysis in Canadian Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2014

Michael Howlett*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University and National University of Singapore
Andrea Migone*
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Administration of Canada
Seck L. Tan*
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
*
Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC Canada V5A 1S6 and Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469c Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 259772. Email: [email protected]
Institute of Public Administration of Canada, Suite 401, 1075 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2B1. Email: [email protected]
Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469c Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 259772. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Policy consultants are external analysts who provide paid policy-related advice to governments on a contractual basis. Previous research on policy work has examined the work done within governments and by policy consultants separately but has not systematically compared and contrasted the two. A key question regarding the nature of policy advisory practices and policy advice systems in general, however, is whether consultants are duplicating the work of government officials in order to help “triangulate” internal advice or whether there is more of a complementary approach in which consultants supplement the work of internal analysts. This article explores the differences among the two groups using data collected over the past five years in two sets of surveys into internal and external policy work in Canada. The analysis finds a “complementary” relationship to exist, contrary to the conventional wisdom that outside or external advice is sought mainly in order to avoid biases in internal advice.

Résumé

Consultants politiques sont des analystes externes qui fournissent payés conseils en matière de politique aux gouvernements sur une base contractuelle. Des recherches antérieures sur le travail politique a examiné le travail effectué au sein des gouvernements et par des consultants politiques séparément, mais n'a pas systématiquement comparés et contrastés des deux. Une question clé en ce qui concerne la nature des pratiques consultatifs sur les politiques et les systèmes de conseils de politique en general, cependant, est de savoir si les consultants sont dupliquer le travail des fonctionnaires du gouvernement afin d'aider à « trianguler » conseil interne ou s'il y a plus d'une approche complémentaire en place ou consultants complètent le travail des analystes internes. Cet article explore les différences entre les deux groupes utilisant les données recueillies au cours des cinq dernières années dans deux séries de sondages en œuvre de la politique interne et externe au Canada. L'analyse révèle une relation «complémentaire» d'exister, contrairement à la sagesse conventionnelle que les conseils de l'extérieur ou externe est recherchée principalement afin d'éviter les biais dans des conseils interne.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANAO. 2001. Developing Policy Advice:2001–2002 Performance Audit. Auditor-General Audit Report no. 21. Canberra: Australian National Audit Office.Google Scholar
Boston, Jonathan. 1994. “Purchasing Policy Advice: The Limits of Contracting Out.” Governance 7 (1): 130.Google Scholar
Boston, Jonathan, Martin, John, Pallot, June and Walsh, Pat. 1996. “Public Management: the New Zealand Model.” In Public Management: The New Zealand Model, ed. Boston, Jonathan, Martin, John, Pallot, June and Walsh, Pat. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Colin. 1983. Governments under Stress: Political Executives and Key Bureaucrats in Washington, London and Ottawa. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Considine, Mark. 2012. “Thinking Outside the Box? Applying Design Theory to Public Policy.” Politics & Policy 40 (4): 704–24.Google Scholar
Colebatch, Hal K., ed. 2006. The Work of Policy: An International Survey. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Colebatch, Hal K., Hoppe, Robert and Noordegraaf, Mirko, eds. 2011. Working for Policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Craft, Jonathan and Howlett, Michael. 2012. “Policy Formulation, Governance Shifts and Policy Influence: Location and Content in Policy Advisory Systems.” Journal of Public Policy 32 (2): 7998.Google Scholar
Craft, Jonathan, and Howlett, Michael. 2013. “The Dual Dynamics of Policy Advisory Systems: The Impact of Externalization and Politicization on Policy Advice.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 187–97.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, Barbara and Mazza, Carmelo. 2003. “Consulting as a Liminal Space.” Human Relations 56 (3): 267–90.Google Scholar
Dent, Helen. 2002. “Consultants and the Public Service.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 61 (1): 108–13.Google Scholar
Druckman, Daniel. 2000a. “Frameworks, Techniques, and Theory: Contributions of Research Consulting in Social Science.” American Behavioral Scientist 43 (10): 1635–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, Daniel. 2000b. “The Social Scientist as Consultant.” American Behavioral Scientist 43 (10): 1565–77.Google Scholar
Durning, Dan and Osuna, Will. 1994. “Policy Analysts' Roles and Value Orientations: An Empirical Investigation Using Q Methodology.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13 (4): 629–57.Google Scholar
Eichbaum, Chris and Shaw, Richard. 2008. “Revisiting Politicization: Political Advisers and Public Servants in Westminster Systems.” Governance 21 (3): 337–63.Google Scholar
Elgie, Robert. 1997. “Models of Executive Politics: A Framework for the Study of Executive Power Relations in Parliamentary and Semi-presidential Regimes.” Political Studies 45 (2): 217–31.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Julia. 2009. “Power Resources of Parliamentary Executives: Policy Advice in the UK and Germany.” West European Politics 32 (1): 196214.Google Scholar
Halligan, John 1995. “Policy Advice and the Public Service.” In Governance in a Changing Environment, ed. Peters, B. Guy and Savoie, Donald J.. Ottawa and Montreal: Canadian Centre for Management Development and McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Halligan, John. 1996. “Learning from Experience in Australian Reform: Balancing Principle and Pragmatism.” In Learning from Reform, ed. Olsen, Johan P. and Peters, B. Guy. Oslo: Scandinavia University Press.Google Scholar
Hawke, Gary R. 1993. Improving Policy Advice. Wellington: Victoria University Institute of Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Hird, John A. 2005. Power, Knowledge and Politics: Policy Analysis in the States. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hoppe, Robert and Jeliazkova, Margarita. 2006. “How Policymakers Define their Jobs: A Netherlands Case Study.” In The Work of Policy: An International Survey, ed. Colebatch, H.. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts [UK]. 2010. Central Government's Use of Consultants and Interims. London: The Stationery Office Limited.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael. 1996. “A Growth Industry? Use of Consultants Reported by Commonwealth Departments 1974–1994.” Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration 80: 6274.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2009. “A Profile of B.C. Provincial Policy Analysts: Troubleshooters or Planners.” Canadian Political Science Review 3 (3): 5568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2011. “Public Managers as the Missing Variable in Policy Studies: An Empirical Investigation Using Canadian Data.” Review of Policy Research 28 (3): 247–63.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Migone, Andrea. 2013a. “The Search for Substance: Externalization, Politicization and the Work of Canadian Policy Consultants 2006–2012.” Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Victoria BC.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Migone, Andrea. 2013b. “The Permanence of Temporary Services: The Reliance of Canadian Federal Departments on Policy and Management Consultants.” Canadian Public Administration 56 (3): 367–88.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Migone, Andrea. 2013c. “Policy Advice through the Market: The Role of External Consultants in Contemporary Policy Advisory Systems.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 241–54.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Migone, Andrea. 2013d. “Perceptions of Consulting Practices and Options among Canadian Government Policy Managers.” Paper presented to the annual meeting of the British Columbia Political Studies Association, Victoria BC.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Migone, Andrea. 2014a. “Making the Invisible Public Service Visible: New Evidence on Contract Size, Type and Structure in the Supply of Policy and Management Consultancies in Canada.” Canadian Public Administration (57) 2: (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Migone, Andrea. 2014b. “Beyond Accountability in Contracting Policy Work: Policy Consultants and Their Oversight in Canada.” Public Management and Money (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Newman, Joshua. 2010. “Policy Analysis and Policy Work in Federal Systems: Policy Advice and its Contribution to Evidence-based Policy-making in Multi-level Governance Systems.” Policy and Society 29 (2): 123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Walker, Richard M.. 2012. “Public Managers in the Policy Process: More Evidence on the Missing Variable?Policy Studies Journal 40 (2): 211–33.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Wellstead, Adam M.. 2011. “Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy Revisited: The Nature of Professional Policy Work in Contemporary Government.” Politics & Policy 39 (4): 613–33.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Wellstead, Adam M.. 2012a. “Professional Policy Work in Federal States: Institutional Autonomy and Canadian Policy Analysis.” Canadian Public Administration 55 (1): 5368.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Wellstead, Adam M.. 2012b. “Policy Work in Multi-Level States: Institutional Autonomy and Task Allocation among Canadian Policy Analysts.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 757–80.Google Scholar
Hunn, D. K. 1994. “Measuring Performance in Policy Advice: A New Zealand Perspective.” In Performance Measurement in Government: Issues and Illustrations. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Kohoutek, Jan, Nekola, Martin and Novotný, Vilém. “Conceptualizing Policy Work as Activity and Field of Research.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 7 (1): 2858.Google Scholar
Macdonald, David. 2011. The Shadow Public Service. The Swelling Ranks of Federal Government Outsourced Workers. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.Google Scholar
Mackay, Keith R. and Uhr, John, eds. 1996. Evaluating Policy Advice: Learning from the Commonwealth Experience. Canberra: Federalism Research Centre, Australian National University and Commonwealth Department of Finance.Google Scholar
Martin, John F. 1998. Reorienting a Nation: Consultants and Australian Public Policy. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Meltsner, Arnold J. 1976. Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
National Audit Office (NAO). 2006. Central Government's Use of Consultants: Market Analysis. Paper presented to the NAO by Fiona Czerniawska. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar
New Zealand. 1994. “Employment of Consultants by Government Departments.” In Report of the Controller and Auditor-General: Third Report for 1994. Wellington: Audit Office.Google Scholar
Pal, Leslie A. 1985. “Consulting Critics: A New Role for Academic Policy Analysts.” Policy Sciences 18 (4): 357–69.Google Scholar
Page, Edward C. and Jenkins, Bill. 2005. Policy Bureaucracy: Governing with a Cast of Thousands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perl, Anthony and White, Donald J.. 2002. “The Changing Role of Consultants in Canadian Policy Analysis.” Policy & Society 21 (1): 4973.Google Scholar
Plowden, William, ed. 1987. Advising the Rulers. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Google Scholar
Public Service Commission. 2010. Use of Temporary Help Services in Public Service Organizations. Ottawa: Public Service Commission.Google Scholar
Radin, Beryl A. 2000. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Rochet, Claude. 2004. “Rethinking the Management of Information in the Strategic Monitoring of Public Policies by Agencies.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 104 (3): 201–08.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard and Suleiman, Ezra, eds. 1980. Presidents and Prime Ministers. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Saint-Martin, Denis. 2005. “The Politics of Management Consulting in Public Sector Reform.” In Handbook of Public Management, ed. Pollitt, Christopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 84106.Google Scholar
Saint-Martin, Denis. 2006. “Le Consulting et l'Etat: Une Analyse Comparée de l'Offre et de la Demande.” Revue Française d'Administration Publique 120 (4): 743–56.Google Scholar
Speers, Kimberly. 2007. “The Invisible Private Service: Consultants and Public Policy in Canada.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, ed. Dobuzinskis, Laurent, Howlett, Michael and Laycock, David. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
State Services Commission [New Zealand]. 1992. The Policy Advice Initiative: Opportunities for Management. Wellington: State Services Commission.Google Scholar
Van Houten, Donald R. and Goldman, Paul. 1981. “Contract Consulting's Hidden Agenda: The Quest for Legitimacy in Government.” The Pacific Sociological Review 24 (4): 461–93.
Veselý, Arnošt. 2012. “Policy Advisory System in the Czech Republic: From the State Monopoly to Hollowing Out?” Paper presented at the IPSA Conference, Madrid.Google Scholar
Veselý, Arnošt. 2013. “Externalization of Policy Advice: Theory, Methodology and Evidence.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 199209.Google Scholar
Wagner, Peter and Wollmann, Hellmut. 1986. “Social Scientists in Policy Research and Consulting: Some Cross-National Comparisons.” International Social Science Journal 38 (4): 99135.Google Scholar
Waller, Mike. 1992. “Evaluating Policy Advice.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 51 (4): 440–49.Google Scholar
Weller, Patrick, and Stevens, Bronwyn. 1998. “Evaluating Policy Advice: The Australian Experience.” Public Administration 76 (3): 579–89.Google Scholar
Wellstead, Adam and Stedman, Richard C.. 2010. “Policy Capacity and Incapacity in Canada's Federal Government – The Intersection of Policy Analysis and Street-level Bureaucracy.” Public Management Review 12 (6): 893910.Google Scholar
Wellstead, M. Adam, Stedman, Richard C. and Howlett, Michael. 2011. “Policy Analytical Capacity in Changing Governance Contexts: a Structural Equation Model (sem) Study of Contemporary Canadian Policy Work.” Public Policy and Administration 26 (3): 353–73.Google Scholar
Wellstead, Adam M., Stedman, Richard C. and Lindquist, Evert. 2007. Beyond the National Capital Region: Federal Regional Policy Capacity. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Wellstead, Adam M., Stedman, Richard C. and Lindquist, Evert A.. 2009. “The Nature of Regional Policy Work in Canada's Federal Public Service.” Canadian Political Science Review 3 (1): 3456.Google Scholar