Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T20:44:23.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dissemination of International Liberal Norms: The Case of the ECHR and the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2006

Kendall W. Stiles
Kendall W. Stiles
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. The dominant theory of international liberal norm-dissemination argues that states will tend to move from rejection of international norms to internationalization through gradual, predictable stages. The presumption is that the mass public consistently presses the state (in partnership with international norm carriers) for greater liberalization. This theory is shown to have serious weaknesses when applied to mature democracies. A study of the UK's response to adverse rulings from the European Court of Human Rights indicates that policy elites respond differently depending on the norm, the security context and public opinion. Further, the public does not consistently advocate liberalization, but sometimes the reverse.

Résumé. Une théorie principale sur la propagation des normes libérales internationales avance que les États ne passent que graduellement du rejet des normes internationales à leur adoption, en passant par plusieurs étapes prévisibles. Elles présument que le grand public (en conjonction avec les créateurs des normes internationales) exerce des pressions continuelles sur les États pour plus de libertés civiques. En fait, cette théorie n'explique pas l'évolution des attitudes vis-à-vis les libertés civiques dans les démocraties avancées. Une étude du Royaume-Uni, par exemple, démontre que, lorsque la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme dénonce une violation de la Convention, les élites politiques réagissent différemment en fonction de la norme en cause, des questions de sécurité et de l'opinion publique. En outre, le public n'est pas toujours en faveur de la libéralisation, au contraire.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 135 - 158
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Alter, Karen J. 1998. “Who are the ‘Masters of the Treaty’?: European Governments and the European Court of Justice.” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 1 (Winter): 121–147.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew and Michelle Strange. 2003. “Criminal Law and Human Rights in 2002.” European Human Rights Law Review 2: 138–149.Google Scholar
Binning, Peter. 2002. “In Safe Hands? Striking the Balance between Privacy and Security—Anti-Terrorist Finance Measures.” European Human Rights Law Review 6: 737–49.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Robert. 1999. Towards a Constitutional Bill of Rights for the United Kingdom: Commentary and Documents. London: Pinter.
Blackburn, Robert. 2002. “The United Kingdom.” Fundamental Rights in Europe: The European Convention on Human Rights and Its Member States, 1950–2000, eds. Robert Blackburn and Jorg Polakiewicz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 934–1008.
Boniface, Susie. 1998. “Hands Off Our Right to Smack.” Evening Herald (Plymouth), September 25, p. 24.
Brook, Lindsay and Ed Cape. 1995. “Libertarianism in Retreat?” In British Social Attitudes: the 12th BSA Report, eds. Roger Jowell, John Curtis, Alison Park, Lindsay Brook, Daphne Ahrendt and Katarina Thomson. Hants, England: Dartmouth Publishers, pp. 191–210.
Bromley, Catherine, John Curtice and Ben Seyd. 2001. “Political Engagement, Trust and Constitutional Reform.” In British Social Attitudes, the 18th Report, eds. Alison Park, John Curtice, Katarina Thomson, Lindsey Jarvis and Catherine Bromley. London: Sage Publishers, pp. 199–226.
Caldeira, Gregory and James Gibson. 1995. “The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support.” American Political Science Review, vol. 89, no. 2 (June): 356–76.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, Shami. 2004. Interview at Liberty offices, June 28, London.
Checkel, Jeffrey. 2001. “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change.” International Organization, vol. 55, no. 3 (Summer): 553–588.Google Scholar
Davis, Darren. 2000. “Individual Level Examination of Postmaterialism in the US: Political Tolerance, Racial Attitudes, Environmentalism, and Participatory Norms.” Political Research Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 3 (September): 455–76.Google Scholar
Doise, William and Christian Staerkle. 2002. “From Social to Political Psychology: The Societal Approach.” In Political Psychology, ed. Kristen Renwick Monroe. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, pp. 151–171.
Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Trevor Smith and Stuart Weir. 2001. Voices of the People: Popular Attitudes to Democratic Renewal in Britain. London: Politicos.
English, Rosalind. 2004. Interview on June 22nd at One Crown Office Row, Temple, London.
Evans, Geoffrey. 2000. “The Working Class and New Labour: A Parting of Ways?” In British Social Attitudes: The 17th BSA Report, eds. Roger Jowell, John Curtis, Alison Park, Katarina Thomson, Lindsay Jarvis, Catherine Bromley and Nina Stratford. London: Sage, pp. 51–70.
Ewing, K.D. and C.A. Gearty. 1990. Freedom Under Thatcher: Civil Liberties in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fenwick, Helen. 2000. New Labour, Freedom and the Human Rights Act. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Ltd.
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “Norms and International Relations Theory.” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4 (Winter): 887–917.Google Scholar
Flockhart, Trine. 2001. “Critical Junctures and Social Identity Theory: Denmark's Euro-friendly Elite and Euro-sceptic Mass Explained.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the International Studies Association, Chicago, Illinois, February 21.
Franklin, Charles and Liane Kosaki. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The US Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review, vol. 83, no. 3 (Sept.): 751–772.Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew. 1998. “Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories.” Journal of Politics, vol. 60, no. 2 (May): 333–54.Google Scholar
Guth, James and John Green. 1990. “Politics in a New Key: Religiosity and Participation among Political Activists.” The Western Political Quarterly, vol. 43, no. 1 (March): 153–79.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren. 1997. “State Responses to International Pressure: Human Rights in Authoritarian Chile.” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 3, no. 4 (December): 403–34.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valeri and Jeffrey Segal. 1996. “The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel.” The Journal of Politics, vol. 58, no. 4 (November): 1079–1102.Google Scholar
Hudson, Valerie and Andrea den Boer. 2004. Bare Branches: The Security Implications of Asia's Surplus Male Population. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Human Rights Watch. 2004. “UK Law Lords Rule Indefinite Detention Breaches Human Rights.” December 16. 〈www.hrw.org〉 (October 3, 2005).
Inglehart, Ronald. 1994. “Economic Security and Value Change.” American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 2 (June): 336–54.Google Scholar
Jackson, Donald. 1997. The United Kingdom Confronts the European Convention on Human Rights. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
Johnston, Alastair Iain. “Treating International Institutions as Social Environments.” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 4 (December 2001): 487–516.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2004. “International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions.” International Organization, vol. 58, no. 3 (Summer): 425–58.Google Scholar
Khagram, Sanjeev, James Riker and Kathryn Sikkink, eds. 2002. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Klotz, Audie. 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kuklinski, James and Norman Hurley. 1994. “On Hearing and Interpreting Political Messages: A Cautionary Tale of Citizen Cue-Taking.” Journal of Politics, vol. 56, no. 3 (August): 729–46Google Scholar
Leigh, David and Richard Norton-Taylor. 2002. “Is Anybody Listening?” The Guardian Unlimited (London), July 12.
Lenart, Silvio. 1994. Shaping Political Attitudes: The Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Mass Media. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Little, Tom. 1998a “Demise of Tawse Blow to Discipline.” The Scotsman (Edinburgh), February 17, p. 4.
Little, Tom. 1998b. “Parents' Hands Tied by Euro Judgment.” The Scotsman (Edinburgh), September 24, p. 1.
Merry, Sally Engle. 1995. “Resistance and the Cultural Power of Law.” Law & Society Review, vol. 29, no. 1: 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mersheimer, John. 1994/95. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security, vol. 19, no. 3 (Winter): 5–50.Google Scholar
Moors, Guy. 2003. “The Two Faces of (Post)Materialism: A Decomposition Approach.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol. 15, no. 4: 396–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe.” International Organization, vol. 54, no. 2 (Spring): 217–252.Google Scholar
Norrie, Alan and Sammy Adelman. 1989. “Consensual Authoritarianism and Criminal Justice in Thatcher's Britain.” Journal of Law and Society, vol. 16, no. 1 (Spring): 112–128.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C. 2002. “Democracy from the Outside In? International Organizations and Democratization.” International Organization, vol. 56, no. 3 (Summer): 515–74.Google Scholar
Rayside, David. 1998. On the Fringe: Gays and Lesbians in Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Risse, Thomas, Stephen Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Risse, Thomas and Kathryn Sikkink 1999. “The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: An Introduction.” In The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, eds. Thomas Risse, Stephen Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–38.
Simpson, Brian. 2001. Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singh, Rabinder and James Strachan. 2002. “The Right to Privacy in English Law.” European Human Rights Law Review, 2: 129–61.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sniderman, Paul, Richard Brody and Philip Tetlock, eds. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tarling, Roger and Lizanne Dowds. 1997. “Crime and Punishment.” In British Social Attitudes: the 14th BSA Report, eds. Roger Jowell, John Curtis, Alison Park, Lindsay Brook, Katarina Thomson and Caroline Bryson. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 148–209.
Tatalovich, Raymond and T. Alexander Smith. 2003. Cultures at War: Moral Conflicts in Western Democracies. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
United Kingdom. House of Lords. 1997–1998. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) vol. 588, Part 136, Column 696.
United Kingdom. House of Lords. 2003–2004. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) vol. 663, Part 111, Column 547.Google Scholar
Weisband, Edward. 2000. “Discursive Multilateralism: Global benchmarks, shame, and learning in the ILO labor standards monitoring regime.” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4 (December): 643–666.Google Scholar
Young, Jock. 1992. “The Rising Demand for Law and Order and Our Maginot Lines of Defense Against Crime.” In Social Change in Contemporary Britain, eds. Nicholas Abercrombie and Alan Warde. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 95–114.
Zimbardo, Philip G. and Michael R. Leippe. 1991. The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence. New York: McGraw-Hill.