No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Canadian Participation in Parliamentary Associations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2009
Abstract
- Type
- Notes
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1974 , pp. 352 - 357
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1974
References
1 The Inter-Parliamentary Union, the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, the North Atlantic Assembly, the Canada-United States Interparliamentary Group, the Canada-France Inter-Parliamentary Association and the International Association of French-Speaking Parliamentarians.
2 See for example the recent study by Abrams, Matthew, The Canada-United States Interparliamentary Group, The Canadian Institute of International Affairs and the Parliamentary Centre for Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade (Toronto, 1973Google Scholar).
3 Price, Trevor, The Role of the House of Commons in External Affairs, ma Thesis, 1968, 141.Google Scholar
4 See Rapport de la 3ième réunion de l'Association interparlementaire Canada-France (Ottawa, 1969), Appendix A, 3.
5 Canada, Senate, Debates, 3 July 1958, 261.Google Scholar
6 See for example, Leeson, Howard and Vanderelst, Wilfried, External Affairs and Canadian Federalism (Toronto, 1973Google Scholar).
7 Le Devoir, 30 September 1969.
8 Globe and Mail, 13 May 1967.
9 La Presse, 22 September 1971.
10 Abrams, Canada–U.S. Interparliamentary Group, vi.
11 Price, House of Commons in External Affairs, 191; see also Abrams, Canada–U.S. Interparliamentary Group, 37.
12 LaMarsh, Judy, Memoirs of a Bird in a Gilded Cage (Toronto, 1968), 14.Google Scholar
13 One Social Credit Member of Parliament recently argued (quite incorrectly), that “for several years our party has not been represented and it seems that it is not entitled to be. I do not think that this is fair… and I would like to know why Liberals, Conservatives and New Democrats are accepted but not members of the Creditiste Party.” See Canada, House of Commons, Standing Committee on Procedure and Organization, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence, 1st Session, 29th Parliament, no. 2 (28 March 1973), 9.Google Scholar
14 McNaught, Kenneth, A Prophet in Politics (Toronto, 1969), 233.Google Scholar
15 These figures based on Canada, House of Commons, Inter-Parliamentary Relations Branch, Summary of Parliamentary Delegations, 1968–1972Google Scholar inclusive.
16 Report of Proceedings of the 10th Canadian Area Conference of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, Newfoundland, July 1969, 24–5. For other statements on the means of selecting delegates see Canada, Senate, Debates, 24 March 1960, 426–7Google Scholar, 19 February 1968, 882. See also Pickersgill, J.W. and Forster, D.F., The Mackenzie King Record, Vol. 4 (Toronto, 1970), 373.Google Scholar
17 Canada, House of Commons, Journals, 19 December 1963, 706.Google Scholar
18 Ibid., 7 October 1964, p. 771.
19 Report of the Executive Committee of the Canadian Branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, Ottawa, 1968, p. 6.
20 Rules of the Canadian Branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (Ottawa, 1971), 6–7.
21 Minutes of a Meeting of the General Membership of the Canadian Group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union, Ottawa, 27 February 1969, 4.
22 Report of the Steering Committee of the Canadian Group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (Ottawa, 1971), 1.
23 Rutes of the Canadian Branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (Ottawa, June 1972), 6.
24 Report of the Steering Committee of the Canadian Group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (Ottawa, 1972), 1.
25 Canada, House of Commons, Standing Committee on External Affairs and National Defence, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence, 2nd session, 28th Parliament, no. 24 (28 April 1970), 31.Google Scholar
26 Canada, Senate, Debates, 12 February 1969, 1019.Google Scholar
27 Ibid., 30 January 1963, 551.