Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:41:43.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

« Canada First » : le nationalisme économique et les relations commerciales canado-américaines de la Confédération à l'ACEUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2019

X. Hubert Rioux*
Affiliation:
Chercheur postdoctoral Banting, École nationale d'administration publique, 4750 Avenue Henri-Julien, Montréal, Québec, H2T-2C8

Résumé

Cet article vise à brosser un portrait de l’évolution des politiques et des relations commerciales canado-américaines en replaçant au cœur de l'analyse la variable du « nationalisme économique ». Il s'appuie sur l'approche « nationaliste » en économie politique internationale, qui permet de comprendre tant le protectionnisme que la libéralisation et surtout, le passage de l'un à l'autre ou la combinaison des deux. Le nationalisme économique constitue une tendance lourde des relations commerciales canado-américaines, qui auront été caractérisées depuis 1867 et au-delà par une tension continuelle entre protectionnisme et libéralisation.

Summary

The recent trade disputes and negotiations between the U.S. and Canada must be construed in light of a century-and-a-half-long evolution of trade relations between the two countries, profoundly marked by the mutations of American economic nationalism. In fact, Canada was for a long time more protectionist than the U.S. The main objective of this article is therefore that of contextualization: to paint a picture of the evolution of Canada-U.S. trade policies and the relationships that brings “economic nationalism” back . The main argument is that these relationships have been characterized by a constant tension between liberalization and protection, to which Canadian governments have contributed in many ways.

Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Abdelal, Rawi. 2001. National Purpose in the World Economy. Post-Soviet States in Comparative Perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Anastakis, Dimitry. 2001. « Continental Auto Politics: The Failure of Opposition to the 1965 Auto Pact in Canada and the United States ». Michigan Historical Review 27 (2): 131156.Google Scholar
Anastakis, Dimitry. 2004. « Between Nationalism and Continentalism: State Auto Industry Policy and the Canadian UAW, 1960–1970 ». Labour/Le Travail 53: 89126.Google Scholar
Baker, W. M. 1970. « A Case Study of Anti-Americanism in English-Speaking Canada: The Election Campaign of 1911 ». The Canadian Historical Review 51 (4): 426449.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, Eugene et Cherniwchan., Jevan 2014. « Tariff Structure, Trade Expansion, and Canadian Protectionism, 1870–1910 ». The Canadian Journal of Economics 47 (1): 144172.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, Eugene et Herbert Emery., J. C. 2001. « Pork Packers, Reciprocity, and Laurier's Defeat in the 1911 Canadian General Election ». The Journal of Economic History 61 (4): 10831101.Google Scholar
Berg, Peter. 2004. « The Canada-U.S. Softwood Lumber Dispute ». Library of Parliament, Ottawa: TIPS-98E.Google Scholar
Canada, Énergie, Mines et Ressources Canada. 1980. The National Energy Program. http://publications.gc.ca/site/archivee-archived.html?url=http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/rncan-nrcan/M23-12-80-4-eng.pdf (consulté le 1er août 2018).Google Scholar
Chapman, Anthony. 1994 [1988]. « Canada-U.S. Free Trade: The Road to Implementation ». Library of Parliament, Ottawa: CIR-88-8E.Google Scholar
Charron, Michel. 2005. « Lumber I to IV: History of the Canada-U.S. Softwood Lumber Dispute » Library of Parliament, Ottawa: TIPS-134E.Google Scholar
Ciuriak, Dan. 2018. « Canada's Progressive Trade Agenda: NAFTA and Beyond ». Institut C. D. Howe, Commentary No. 516.Google Scholar
Crane, David. 2006. « Canada-US Auto Pact », The Canadian Encyclopedia. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/canada-us-automotive-products-agreement/ (consulté le 1er août 2018).Google Scholar
Crane, George T. 1998. « Economic Nationalism : Bringing the Nation Back In », Millenium–Journal of International Studies, 27 (1) : 5575.Google Scholar
Creighton, D. G. 1942. « Economic Nationalism and Confederation ». Report of the Annual Meeting (The Canadian Historical Association) 21 (1): 4451.Google Scholar
Dalpé, Robert. 1987. « Politique commerciale et contrôle de l'investissement étranger : l'expérience canadienne ». Revue canadienne de science politique 20 (2): 337361.10.1017/S0008423900049477Google Scholar
Deblock, Christian. 2002. « Les droits sur l'acier et le protectionnisme. Un commentaire », Groupe de recherche sur l'intégration continentale, 10 mars.Google Scholar
Deblock, Christian. 2002b. « La politique commerciale américaine, ou le libre-échange à la carte », Groupe de recherche sur l'intégration continentale, 28 mai.Google Scholar
Deblock, Christian. 2002c. « Du mercantilisme au compétitivisme : le retour du refoulé », Cahiers de recherche du CEIM 02-03.Google Scholar
Deblock, Christian. 2012. « Les relations commerciales entre le Canada et les États-Unis à l'heure des trois ‘D’ », Cahier de recherche du CEIM, ISSN 1714–7638.Google Scholar
Deblock, Christian et Rioux., Michelle 1992. « Le libre-échange nord-américain : le joker des États-Unis? ». Dans Mondialisation et régionalisation. La coopération économique internationale est-elle encore possible?, dir. Deblock, Christian et Éthier, Diane, Montréal : Presses de l'Université du Québec.Google Scholar
Eden, Lorraine et Appel Molot., Maureen 1993. « Canada's National Policies: Reflections on 125 Years », Canadian Public Policy 19 (3) : 232251.Google Scholar
Feldman, Lily Gardner. 1978. « Canada and the United States in the 1970s: Rift and Reconciliation ». The World Today 34 (12): 484492.Google Scholar
Finger, J. M., Keith Hall, H. et Nelson., Douglas R. 1982. « The Political Economy of Administered Protection ». The American Economic Review 72 (3): 452466.Google Scholar
Firestone, O. J. 1960. « Canada's External Trade and Net Foreign Balance, 1851–1900 ». Dans Trends in the American Economy in the Nineteenth Century, dir. Roberts., George B. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fisk, George M. 1910. « The Payne-Aldrich Tariff ». Political Science Quarterly 25 (1): 3568.Google Scholar
Gagné, Gilbert. 2003. « The Canada-US Softwood Lumber Dispute: A Test Case for the Development of International Trade Rules ». International Journal 58 (3): 335-368.Google Scholar
Gecelovsky, Paul et Kukucha., Christopher 2009. « Much ado about Parties: Conservative and Liberal Approaches to Canada's Trade Policy with the United States ». International Journal 64 (1) : 2945.10.1177/002070200906400103Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Globerman, Steven. 1984. « The Consistency of Canada's Foreign Investment Review Process–A Temporal Analysis ». Journal of International Business Studies 15 (1): 119129.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, H. Carl. 1936. « The Canada-United States Trade Agreement, 1935. » The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 2 (2): 209212.Google Scholar
Greenfeld, Liah. 2001. The Spirit of Capitalism. Nationalism and Economic Growth. Cambridge & Londres: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grey, Rodney de C. 1982. « Some Issues in Canada-US Trade Relations ». Canadian Public Policy 8 (numéro spécial): 451456.10.2307/3549624Google Scholar
Griffin, Watson. 1906. « The Canadian Manufacturers’ Tariff Campaign ». The North American Review 183 (597): 195206.Google Scholar
Hamel, Bruno. 1991. « La politique commerciale des États-Unis : entre le protectionnisme et le libre-échange ». Continentalisation, Cahier de recherche 91 (6).Google Scholar
Hannigan, Robert E. 1980. « Reciprocity 1911: Continentalism and American Weltpolitik ». Diplomatic History 4 (1): 118.Google Scholar
Harris, Richard, Keay, Ian et Lewis., Frank 2015. « Protecting Infant Industries: Canadian Manufacturing and the National Policy, 1870–1913 ». Explorations in Economic History 56: 1531.Google Scholar
Hart, Michael. 2002. A Trading Nation. Canadian Trade Policy from Colonialism to Globalization. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric. 1994. States and the Reemergence of Global Finance. From Bretton Woods to the 1990s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric et Pickel., Andreas, dir., 2005. Economic Nationalism in a Globalizing World. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde et Jung., Euijin 2017. « NAFTA Renegotiation: US Offensive and Defensive Interests vis-à-vis Canada ». Peterson Institute for International Economics, Policy Brief 17–22. https://piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/nafta-renegotiation-us-offensive-and-defensive-interests-vis-vis-canada (consulté le 1er août 2018).Google Scholar
Inwood, Kris et Keay., Ian 2013. « Trade policy and industrial development: iron and steel in a small open economy, 1870–1913 ». The Canadian Journal of Economics 46 (4): 12651291.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A. 2017. Clashing Over Commerce. A History of US Trade Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A. 1998. « From Smoot-Hawley to Reciprocal Trade Agreements: Changing the Course of U.S. Trade Policy in the 1930s ». Dans The Defining Moment: The Great Depression and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century, dir. Bordo, Michael, Goldin, Claudia et White, Eugene. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Jacks, David S. 2014. « Defying gravity: The Imperial Economic Conference and the reorientation of Canadian trade ». Explorations in Economic History 53: 1939.Google Scholar
James, Patrick et Michelin., Robert 1989. « The Canadian National Energy Program and Its Aftermath: Perspectives on an Era of Confrontation ». American Review of Canadian 19 (1) : 5981.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Barbara. 1986. « Reexamining the ‘obsolescing bargain’: a study of Canada's National Energy Program ». International Organization 40 (1): 139165.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard et Percy., Michael B. 1980. « Reciprocity, Imperial Sentiment, and Party Politics in the 1911 Election ». Canadian Journal of Political Science 13 (4): 711729.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., dir., 1996. The Culture of National Security. New-York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. et Nye, Joseph S. 1989. Power and Interdependence, New-York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Kottman, Richard N. 1965. « The Canadian-American Trade Agreement of 1935 ». The Journal of Economic History 52 (2): 275296.Google Scholar
Kottman, Richard N. 1975. « Herbert Hoover and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff: Canada, A Case Study ». The Journal of Economic History 62 (3): 609635.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1978. Defending the National Interest. Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1988. Power, Protection, and Free Trade. International Sources of U.S. Commercial Strategy, 1887–1939. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Latulippe, Jean-Guy. 1976. « Le traité de réciprocité 1854–1866 ». L'Actualité économique 52 (4): 432–58.Google Scholar
Marchildon, Gregory P. 1993. « Canadian Trade and Investment: Historical Trends and the Impact of the FTA and NAFTA ». Built Environment 19 (1) : 5059.Google Scholar
Mayall, James. 1990. Nationalism and international society. New-York : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDiarmid, O. J. 1947. « Canadian Tariff Policy ». The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 253 : 150157.Google Scholar
McDonald, Judith A., O'Brien, Anthony Patrick et Callahan., Colleen M. 1997. « Trade Wars: Canada's Reaction to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff ». The Journal of Economic History 57 (4) : 802826.Google Scholar
Miller, Eric. 2017. « Remaking NAFTA: Its Origin, Impact and Future ». Canadian Global Affairs Institute, Policy paper. https://www.cgai.ca/remaking_nafta_its_origin_impact_and_future (consulté le 1er août 2018).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. « Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics », International Organization, 51 (4) : 513553.Google Scholar
Neill, Robin. 1991. A History of Canadian Economic Thought. New-York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Officer, Lawrence H. et Smith., Lawrence B. 1968. « The Canadian-American Reciprocity Treaty of 1855 to 1966 ». The Journal of Economic History 28 (4) : 598623.Google Scholar
Osborne, John Ball. 1904. « Reciprocity in the American Tariff System ». The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 23 : 5583.Google Scholar
Ouellet, Richard. 2018. « Le rôle du Canada dans l’évolution institutionnelle et substantive du système GATT/OMC ». Center for International Governance Innovation : Document no 24.Google Scholar
Parizeau, Jacques. 1958. « Le commerce du Canada avec le Commonwealth ». L'Actualité économique 34 (3) : 383399.Google Scholar
Paton, H. S. 1921. « Reciprocity with Canada: The Canadian Viewpoint ». The Quarterly Journal of Economics 35 (4) : 571595.Google Scholar
Porritt, Edward. 1906. « Canada's Tariff Mood towards the United States ». The North American Review 182 (593) : 565578.Google Scholar
Porritt, Edward. 1907. « Iron and Steel Bounties in Canada ». Political Science Quarterly 22 (2) : 193223.Google Scholar
Porritt, Edward. 1917. « Canada's National Policy ». Political Science Quarterly 32 (2) : 177208.Google Scholar
Rao, Govind C. 2010. « The National Question in Canadian Development: Permeable Nationalism and the Ideological Basis for Incorporation Into Empire ». Studies in Political Economy 85 : 169178.Google Scholar
Russell, John W. 1897. « Our Trade Relations with Canada ». The North American Review 164 (487) : 710718.Google Scholar
Scheinberg, Stephen. 1973. « Invitation to Empire: Tariffs and American Economic Expansion in Canada ». The Business History Review 47 (2) : 218238.Google Scholar
Schwob, Claude. 2009. « Did the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934 initiate a Revolution in the American Trade Policy? ». Historical Social Research 34 (4) : 377389.Google Scholar
Smith, Andrew. 2008. « Toryism, Classical Liberalism, and Capitalism: The Politics of Taxation and the Struggle for Canadian Confederation. » The Canadian Historical Review 89 (1): 125.Google Scholar
Taussig, F.W. 1891. « The McKinley Tariff Act ». The Economic Journal 1 (2) : 326350.Google Scholar
Taylor, K. W. 1948. « Tariffs ». Dans The Encyclopedia of Canada, Vol. VI, dir. Stewart Wallace, W.. Toronto : University Associates of Canada.Google Scholar
The Yale Law Journal. 1971. « The Trade Act of 1971: A Fundamental Change in United States Foreign Trade Policy ». The Yale Law Journal 80 (7) : 14181455.Google Scholar
Thomas, Douglas P. 1967. « The Canada-U.S. Auto Trade Agreement ». Financial Analysts Journal 23 (4) : 113117.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M. 1989. « Energy Policy and Free Trade in Canada ». Energy Policy 17 (4) : 323330.Google Scholar
Watson, Willian G. 1987. « Canada-US Free Trade: Why Now? ». Canadian Public Policy 13 (3) : 337349.Google Scholar
Wells, Guy-Philippe. 2019. « Présentation de l'ACEUM, l'Accord Canada-États-Unis-Mexique. Un peu plus haut, un peu plus loin », Chronique commerciale américaine du CEIM 12 (2).Google Scholar
Wickett, S. Morley. 1913. « Canada and the Preference: Canadian Trade with Great Britain and the United States ». The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 45 : 2946.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Bruce W. 1983. « The Balance of International Payments, International Investment Position and Foreign Trade », Historical Statistics of Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-516-x/sectiong/4147439-eng.htm (consulté le 1er août 2018).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Bruce W. 1987. « Canada-United States Free Trade: The Current Debate ». International Journal 42 (1) : 199218.Google Scholar