Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:24:58.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birds of a Feather? Citizenship Norms, Group Identity, and Political Participation in Western Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2009

Tracey Raney  and
Loleen Berdahl
Tracey Raney*
Affiliation:
Ryerson University
Loleen Berdahl*
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan
*
Tracey Raney, Department of Politics and Public Administration, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaM5B 2K3, [email protected].
Loleen Berdahl, Department of Political Studies, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CanadaS7N 5A5, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. This paper explores how citizenship norms of duty to vote and to volunteer in one's community influence political participation, and the role of group identities in producing these norms. By showing how citizenship norms influence an array of political activities, and by drawing on social psychology literature that shows how citizenship norms are shaped by group identifications, the paper offers a more complete picture of the relationship between citizenship norms and political participation beyond traditional civic duty/federal vote models that currently dominate Canadian political research. The central argument forwarded is that not only do citizenship norms matter to political participation, but that group identities matter, too.

Résumé. Cette étude explore les effets sur la participation politique des normes relatives au devoir du citoyen de voter et de contribuer à sa communauté, de même que le rôle des identités de groupe dans la production de ces normes. En montrant comment les normes de citoyenneté influencent une foule d'activités politiques et en puisant dans la littérature en psychologie sociale, qui montre comment ces normes sont formées par des identifications de groupe, cette étude aide à mieux comprendre la relation entre ces normes et la participation politique au-delà du cadre traditionnel devoir civique / vote fédéral qui domine actuellement la recherche en politique canadienne. La thèse avancée est que les normes de citoyenneté jouent effectivement un rôle important dans la participation politique, tout comme les identités de groupe.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 187 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Laban, Yasmeen. 2002. “Challenging the Gendered Vertical Mosaic: Immigrants, Ethnic Minorities, Gender, and Political Participation.” In Citizen Politics: Research and Theory in Canadian Political Behaviour, ed. Everitt, Joanna and O'Neill, Brenda. Don Mills ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sydney. 1989. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Black, Jerome. 2001. “Immigrants and Ethnoracial Minorities in Canada: A Review of Their Participation in Federal Electoral Politics.” Electoral Insight 3(1): 8–13.Google Scholar
Blais, André. 2000. To Vote or Not: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nadeau, Richard and Nevitte, Neil. 2004. “Where Does Turnout Decline Come From?” European Journal of Political Research 43: 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André and Rubenson, Daniel. 2008. “Turnout Decline: Generational Value Change or New Cohorts' Response to Electoral Competition?” Unpublished manuscript. Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip, Miller, William and Stokes, D.E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E. 2006. Why We Vote: How Schools and Communities Shape Our Civic Life. Princton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E., Munro, Mary, Alford, John R. and Campbell, Bruce A.. 1986. “Partisanship and Voting.” In Research in Micropolitics, ed. Vol, Samuel Long.. 1, Greenwich CN: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Jenson, Jane, LeDuc, Lawrence and Pammett, Jon H.. 1980. Political Choice in Canada. Abridged ed.Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.Google Scholar
Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, William. 2004. Political Parties. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2008a. “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation.” Political Studies 56: 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2008b. The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation is Reshaping American Politics. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press Inc.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P., eds. 2000. Parties without Partisans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erickson, Lynda and O'Neill, Brenda. 2002. “The Gender Gap and the Changing Woman Voter in Canada.” International Political Science Review 23(4): 373–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Green, Donald P.. 2000. “The Effect of a Non-Partisan Get-Out-the-Vote Drive: An Experimental Study of Leafletting.” Journal of Politics 62(3): 846–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbins, Roger. 1994. “The Challenge of New Politics and New Social Movements to the Future of Federalism.” In Federalism and the New World Order, ed. Randall, Stephen and Gibbins, Roger. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth. 1995. “Economic Man—Social Woman: The Case for the Gender Gap in Support for the Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement.” Comparative Political Studies 28: 384–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nevitte, Neil and Nadeau, Richard. 2004. Citizens. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael and Opp, Karl-Dieter, eds. 2001. Social Norms. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie and Khatib, Nadia. 2007. “American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren and Shanks, J. Merrill. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nakhaie, Reza. 2006. “Electoral Participation in Municipal, Provincial and Federal Elections in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 39(2): 363–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevitte, Neil. 1996. The Decline of Deference. Peterborough ON: Broadview Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Brenda. 2001. Generational Patterns in the Political Opinions and Behaviour of Canadians: Separating the Wheat from the Chaff.” IRPP Policy Matters 2: 5.Google Scholar
Pammett, Jon H. and LeDuc, Lawrence. 2003. “Explaining the Turnout Decline in Canadian Federal Elections: A New Survey of Non-Voters.” Electoral Law & Policy. http://www.elections.ca (Accessed March 2nd, 2001).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62(1): 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon. 1987. “Identity Theory: Developments and Extensions.” In Self and Identity: Psychosocial Perspectives, ed. Yardley, K. and Honess, T.. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon and Serpe, Richard T.. 1982. “Commitment, identity salience and role behaviour.” In Personality, Roles and Social Behavior, ed. Ickes, W. and Knowles, E.. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1978. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Terry, Deborah J., Hogg, Michael.A. and M.White, Katherine. 1999. “The Theory of Planned Behaviour: Self-identity, Social Identity and Group Norms.” British Journal of Social Psychology 38(3): 225–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven CN: Yale University Press.Google Scholar