Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:52:00.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bilan des réformes électorales au Canada : Quelle place pour les femmes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2010

Manon Tremblay
Manon Tremblay*
Affiliation:
École d'études politiques, Université d'Ottawa, [email protected]
*
Manon Tremblay, École d'études politiques, Université d'Ottawa, 55, rue Laurier, Pavillon Desmarais, pièce 9111 Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Résumé. Ce texte examine les différents projets de réforme électorale proposés depuis le tournant du millénaire dans les provinces canadiennes et au Nunavut, et ce, avec le souci de mettre au jour la place qu'ils aménagèrent à l'objectif d'accentuer la féminisation des assemblées législatives. L'idée maîtresse qui l'inspire veut que les propositions réformatrices aient réservé une importance le plus souvent nulle, bien que parfois accessoire, mais jamais centrale, à cette question. Pourtant, le Québec, et surtout le territoire du Nunavut, se démarquent par l'attention qu'ils portèrent au problème de l'effacement des femmes de la scène politique et leurs propositions de réforme ont offert des réponses plus à même de le solutionner.

Abstract. This essay examines the different electoral reform projects proposed since the turn of the millennium in Canadian provinces and the territory of Nunavut, in order to reveal what accommodation they have made to the objective of increasing the feminization of legislative assemblies. My guiding idea is that most reform proposals have given no, or sometimes peripheral, emphasis to this question but have never made it a central issue. However, Quebec and, even more, Nunavut stand out for the attention that they have paid to the absence of women from the political scene, and their reform proposals have included responses that might offer a solution.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 25 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Acharid, Mustapha et al. 2006. Le mode de scrutin, votre opinion est fondamentale ! Rapport remis à la Commission spéciale sur la Loi électorale. Québec. 12 avril (disponible à http://www.assnat.qc.ca/fra/37legislature2/commissions/Csle/rapport_comite_csle.pdf; page consultée en octobre 2009).Google Scholar
Assemblée nationale du Québec (Commission des institutions). 2002. Mandat d'initiative. La réforme du mode de scrutin au Québec. Document de consultation. Québec : Secrétariat des commissions de l'Assemblée nationale du Québec. octobre (disponible à http://www.assnat.qc.ca/fra/Publications/rapports/rapci1.html; page consultée en octobre 2009).Google Scholar
Assemblée nationale du Québec (Commission spéciale sur la Loi électorale). 2006. Le mode de scrutin, votre opinion est fondamentale ! Consultations particulières et auditions publiques sur l'avant-projet de loi sur la Loi électorale. Québec. 31 mai (disponible à http://www.assnat.qc.ca/fra/37legislature2/commissions/Csle/rapport-csle-2.htm; page consultée en octobre 2009).Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun et Grofman, Bernard, dir. 2000. Elections in Australia, Ireland and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote: Reflections on an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor (MI) : University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbert, Louise. 2006. Rural Women's Leadership in Atlantic Canada. First-Hand Perspectives on Local Public Life and Participation in Electoral Politics. Toronto : University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Norman H. 2003. 2003 Prince Edward Island Electoral Reform Commission Report. [Charlottetown]. décembre (disponible à http://www.gov.pe.ca/photos/original/er_premier2003.pdf?PHPSESSID=39e691d3388c41a312d95cfd75a7a6bf; page consultée en octobre 2009).Google Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth, Blais, André et Fournier, Patrick. 2008. «When Citizens Choose to Reform SMP: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform». Dans To keep or To Change First Past The Post? The Politics of Electoral Reform, dir. Blais, André. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 140–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, Paul. 2006. «Women and Constitutional Reform: Gender Parity in the National Assembly for Wales». Dans Representing Women in Parliament. A Comparative Study, dir. Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon et Trimble, Linda. Londres : Routledge, 188–203.Google Scholar
Comité directeur sur la réforme des institutions démocratiques. 2003. Prenez votre place ! Rapport du Comité directeur sur la réforme des institutions démocratiques. [s. l.] : Le Comité. mars.Google Scholar
Commission du droit du Canada. 2004. Un vote qui compte : la réforme électorale au Canada. Ottawa : La Commission (disponible à http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/J3-004F.pdf; page consultée en octobre 2009).Google Scholar
Commission sur la démocratie législative (CDL). 2004. Options. Un rapport d'étape à l'intention des citoyens et citoyennes du Nouveau-Brunswick. Fredericton : La Commission (disponible à http://www.gnb.ca/0100/doc/options-f.pdf; page consultée en octobre 2009).Google Scholar
Commission sur la démocratie législative (CDL). 2005. Sommaire des recommandations. Fredericton : La Commission (disponible à http://www.gnb.ca/0100/Summary-f.pdf; page consultée en octobre 2009).Google Scholar
Courtney, John C. 2004. Elections. Vancouver : UBC Press.Google Scholar
Courtney, John C. 2005. «Is Talk of Electoral Reform Just Whistling in the Wind?» Dans Strengthening Canadian Democracy, dir. Howe, Paul, Johnston, Richard et Blais, André. Montréal : IRPP, 149–158.Google Scholar
Dahl, Jens. 1997. «Gender Parity in Nunavut». Indigenous Affairs 3/4 : 42–47.Google Scholar
Darcy, R., Welch, Susan et Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, & Representation. 2e édition. Lincoln : University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Directeur général des élections du Québec. 2007. Les modalités d'un mode de scrutin mixte compensatoire. Le rapport du Directeur général des élections. Résumé. [Québec] : DGÉQ. décembre (disponible à http://www.electionsquebec.qc.ca/documents/pdf/Resume.pdf; page consultée en octobre 2009).Google Scholar
Ferrara, Federico, Herron, Erik S. et Nishikawa, Misa. 2005. Mixed Electoral Systems. Contamination and Its Consequences. Houndmills : Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gombay, Nicole. 2000. «The politics of culture: Gender parity in the legislative assembly of Nunavut». Inuit Studies 24, 1 : 125–148.Google Scholar
Henderson, Ailsa. 2007. Nunavut : Rethinking Political Culture. Vancouver : UBC Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, Jack et White, Graham. 2000. «Nunavut: Inuit Self-determination Through a Land Claim and Public Government». Dans Nunavut: Inuit Regain Control of their Lands and their Lives, dir. Dahl, Jens, Hicks, Jack et Jull, Peter. Copenhagen : International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, 30–117.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald et Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide. Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Amy. 2007. «But Is It for Real? The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly as a Model of State-Sponsored Citizen Empowerment». Politics & Society 35, 1 : 35–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Amy. 2008. «Agenda-setting in deliberative forums: expert influence and citizen autonomy in the British Columbia Citizens' Assembly». Dans Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly, dir. Warren, Mark E. et Pearse, Hilary. New York : Cambridge University Press, 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larserud, Stina et Taphorn, Rita. 2007. Designing for Equality. Best-fit, medium-fit and non-favourable combinations of electoral systems and gender quotas. Stockholm : International IDEA.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona. 2006. «Descriptive and Substantive Representation in New Parliamentary Spaces: The Case of Scotland». Dans Representing Women in Parliament. A Comparative Study, dir. Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon et Trimble, Linda. Londres : Routledge, 171–187.Google Scholar
Massicotte, Louis. 2005. «Changing the Canadian Electoral System». Dans Strengthening Canadian Democracy, dir. Howe, Paul, Johnston, Richard et Blais, André. Montréal : IRPP, 65–98.Google Scholar
Massicotte, Louis. 2007. «Towards a Mixed-Member Proportional System for Québec?» Representation 43, 4 : 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massicotte, Louis. 2008. «Electoral Reform in Canada». Dans To keep or To Change First Past The Post? The Politics of Electoral Reform, dir. Blais, André. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 112–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massicotte, Louis et Bernard, André. 1985. Le scrutin au Québec : un miroir déformant. Ville de Lasalle : Hurtubise HMH.Google Scholar
Mateo Diaz, Mercedes. 2005. Representing Women? Female Legislators in West European Parliaments. Colchester : ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 2003. «Women's Representation in Post-Communist Europe». Dans Women's Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe, dir. Matland, Richard E. et Montgomery, Kathleen A.. New York : Oxford University Press, 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 2005. «Enhancing Women's Political Participation: Legislative Recruitment and Electoral Systems». Dans Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers. A Revised Edition, dir. Ballington, Julie et Karam, Azza. Stockholm : International IDEA, 93–111.Google Scholar
McLeay, Elizabeth. 2006. «Climbing On: Rules, Values and Women's Representation in the New Zealand Parliament». Dans Representing Women in Parliament. A Comparative Study, dir. Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon et Trimble, Linda. Londres : Routledge, 67–82.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Matthew et Parkin, Andrew. 2005. «Getting from Here to There: A Process for Electoral Reform in Canada». Dans Strengthening Canadian Democracy, dir. Howe, Paul, Johnston, Richard et Blais, André. Montréal : IRPP, 137–147.Google Scholar
Milner, Henry, dir. 2004. Steps Toward Making Every Vote Count. Electoral System Reform in Canada and its Provinces. Peterborough : Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Minor, Tina. 2002. «Political Participation of Inuit Women in the Government of Nunavut». Wicazo Sa Review 17, 1 : 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morisset, Michel. 2006. Commission spéciale sur la Loi électorale. Votre opinion est fondamentale. Québec. avril (disponible à http://www.assnat.qc.ca/fra/37legislature2/commissions/Csle/rapport_comite_morisset.pdf; page consultée en octobre 2009).Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997. «Introduction: theories of recruitment». Dans Passages to Power. Legislative recruitment in advanced democracies, dir. Norris, Pippa. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1–14.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering. Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, Carty, R. J., Erickson, Lynda, Lovenduski, Joni et Simms, Marian. 1990. «Party Selectorates in Australia, Britain and Canada: Prolegomena for Research in the 1990s». Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 28, 2 : 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa et Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment. Gender, race and class in the British Parliament. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nunavut Implementation Commission. 1994. Two-Member Constituencies and Gender Equality: A “Made in Nunavut” Solution for an Effective and Representative Legislature. Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela et Kunovich, Sheri. 2003. «Women's Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology». Social Forces 82, 1 : 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford : Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pilon, Dennis. 2006. «Explaining Voting System Reform in Canada: 1874 to 1960». Journal of Canadian Studies 40, 3 : 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilon, Dennis. 2007. The Politics of Voting. Reforming Canada's Electoral System. Toronto : Emond Montgomery Publications Limited.Google Scholar
Québec (Réforme des institutions démocratiques). 2004. Avant-projet de loi remplaçant la Loi électorale, Document explicatif, [Québec] : Gouvernement du Québec (disponible à http://www.institutions-democratiques.gouv.qc.ca/publications/resume_avant_projet_loi.pdf; page consultée en octobre 2009).Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew, Reilly, Ben et Ellis, Andrew. 2005. Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm : International IDEA.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances, Salmond, Rob et Thies, Michael F.. 2006. «Welfare Works: Explaining Female Legislative Representation». Politics & Gender 2, 2 : 165–192.Google Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1987. «Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors and Women's Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-Three Democracies». Western Political Quarterly 40, 3 : 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1994. «Parliaments of, by, and for the People: Except for Women?» Dans Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities, dir. Rule, Wilma et Zimmerman, Joseph F.. Westport : Greenwood Press, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, Wilma et Norris, Pippa. 1992. «Anglo and Minority Women's Underrepresentation in Congress: Is the Electoral System the Culprit?» Dans United States Electoral Systems. Their Impact on Women and Minorities, dir. Rule, Wilma et Zimmerman, Joseph F.. New York : Praeger, 41–54.Google Scholar
Rule, Wilma et Zimmerman, Joseph F., dir. 1994. Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. Westport : Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Salmond, Rob. 2006. «Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians». Legislative Studies Quarterly 31, 2 : 175–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidle, Leslie. 2002. Electoral System Reform in Canada: Objectives, Advocacy and Implications for Governance. Canadian Policy Research Networks. Discussion Paper F|28 (disponible à http://www.cprn.com/doc.cfm?doc=162; page consultée en octobre 2009).Google Scholar
Sénac-Slawinski, Réjane. 2008. La parité. Paris : PUF, collection Que sais-je? no 3795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg et Wattenberg, Martin P., dir. 2001. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siaroff, Alan. 2000. «Women's Representation in Legislatures and Cabinets in Industrial Democracies». International Political Science Review 21, 2 : 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Manon. 2007. «Democracy, Representation, and Women: a Comparative Analysis». Democratization 14, 4 : 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Manon, dir. 2008a. Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas. New York : Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Manon. 2008b. 100 questions sur les femmes et la politique. Montréal : Remue-ménage.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Manon. 2008c. «Introduction». Dans Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas, dir. Tremblay, Manon. New York : Palgrave-Macmillan, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Manon et Steele, Jackie F.. 2006. «Paradise Lost? Gender parity and the Nunavut experience». Dans Representing Women in Parliament. A Comparative Study, dir. Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon et Trimble, Linda. Londres : Routledge, 221–235.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. et Pearse, Hilary, dir. 2008. Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly. New York : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Lisa. 1997. «Gender Equal Legislatures: Evaluating the Proposed Nunavut Electoral System». Canadian Public Policy 23, 3 : 306–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar