Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:03:53.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Americanization of Canadian Political Science? The Doctoral Training of Canadian Political Science Faculty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2017

Quinn M. Albaugh
Quinn M. Albaugh*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
*
Department of Politics, 130 Corwin Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA, email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fifty years ago, Canadian political science (CPS) debated whether there was an “Americanization problem” in the discipline. Today, the idea does not have the same force. This article revisits the debate by focusing on one of the main points of concerns: the doctoral training of CPS faculty. The article presents an original dataset of tenure and tenure-track faculty at CPS departments. It then provides analysis of where these tenure and tenure-track faculty received their doctorates, by sub-field and rank, paying particular attention to the country of doctoral training. Unlike fifty years ago, Canadian-trained scholars form a much larger share of the professoriate. There is no evidence of a trend towards more American-trained scholars among recent hires of assistant professors. However, the results also suggest a continuing status hierarchy between the two countries. It concludes by arguing that CPS needs to be more reflective about its position within this status hierarchy.

Résumé

Il y a cinquante ans, la science politique canadienne (SPC) débattait de l'existence d'un « problème d'américanisation » dans la discipline. Aujourd'hui, l'idée n'a plus la même intensité. Cet article réactualise ce débat en se concentrant sur un des principaux points qui soulèvent des inquiétudes : la formation doctorale des professeurs de SPC. L'article présente un ensemble de données original sur les professeurs permanents et sur ceux qui occupent des postes menant à la permanence au sein des départements de SPC. Il analyse ensuite le lieu où ces professeurs permanents ou adjoints ont obtenu leur doctorat, par sous-domaine et grade, en accordant une attention particulière au pays de formation doctorale. À la différence d'il y a cinquante ans, les chercheurs formés au Canada représentent une plus grande partie du corps professoral. Rien n'indique qu'il y ait une tendance vers un plus grand nombre de chercheurs formés aux États-Unis parmi les embauches récentes de professeurs adjoints. Toutefois, les résultats suggèrent également la continuité d'une hiérarchie sociale entre les deux pays. Il conclut en soutenant que la SPC a besoin de mieux comprendre sa position à l'intérieur de cette hiérarchie.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 243 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, Michael and Shugarman, David. 1970. “Canadian Nationalism, Americanization, and Scholarly Values.” Journal of Canadian Studies 5 (3): 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, Alan C. 1975. “Political Science in Canada and the Americanization Issue.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 8 (2): 191–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, Alan C. 2008. “Are We on the Right Track?” In The Comparative Turn in Canadian Political Science, ed. White, Linda A., Richard, Simeon, Vipond, Robert and Wallner, Jennifer. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Clauset, Aaron, Aresman, Samuel and Larremore, Daniel P.. 2015. “Systematic Inequality and Hierarchy in Faculty Hiring Networks.” Science Advances 1 (1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Employment and Social Development Canada. 2016. “Hire a foreign academic.” https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/services/foreign-workers/foreign-workers-hire-academic/ (December 12, 2016).Google Scholar
Hull, W.H.N. 1973. “The 1971 Survey of the Profession.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 6 (1): 89–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberg, Allan and Tharp, Alan. 1972. “The American Impact on Canadian Political Science and Sociology.” In The Influence of the United States on Canadian Development, ed. Preston, Richard A.. Durham NC: Duke University Commonwealth Studies Center.Google Scholar
Lalande, Gilles. 1971. “Presidential Address.” CPSA Newsletter, September: 1–6.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C.B. 1974. “After Strange Gods: Canadian Political Science 1973.” In Perspectives on the Social Sciences in Canada, ed. Guinsburg, T.N. and Reuber, G.L.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Robin and Steele, James Arthur, eds. 1969. The Struggle for Canadian Universities. Toronto: Free Press.Google Scholar
Smiley, Donald. 1974. “Must Canadian Political Science Be a Miniature Replica?” Journal of Canadian Studies 9 (1): 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vipond, Robert. 2008. “Introduction: The Comparative Turn in Canadian Political Science.” In The Comparative Turn in Canadian Political Science, ed. White, Linda A., Simeon, Richard, Vipond, Robert and Wallner, Jennifer. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Reginald. 1979. “‘Confused Alarms of Struggle and Flight’: English-Canadian Political Science in the 1970s.” Canadian Historical Review 50 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Albaugh supplementary material

Albaugh supplementary material 1

Download Albaugh supplementary material(File)
File 246.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Albaugh supplementary material

Albaugh supplementary material 2

Download Albaugh supplementary material(File)
File 31.6 KB