Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:05:55.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alternative Styles in the Study of Canadian Politics: A Brief Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Richard J. van Loon
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Michael S. Whittington
Affiliation:
Carleton University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles/Notes Bibliographiques
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Big steps in this direction have been taken by professors Smiley and Simeon in their recent books on federalism and federal-provincial relations. See, Smiley, D.V., Canada in Question: Federalism in the Seventies (Toronto, 1972Google Scholar); Simeon, R., Federal Provincial Diplomacy, (Toronto, 1972Google Scholar). See also, Whittington, M.S., “Interjurisdictional Coordination and Public Policy” ed. Paltiel, , Falcone, , and Whittington, , (eds.) Perspectives on Canadian Public Policy (Toronto, 1974Google Scholar).

2 See Bird, Richard, The Growth of Government Spending in Canada (Toronto, 1970Google Scholar).

3 See Falcone, D.J. and Whittington, M.S., “Output Change in Canada: A Preliminary Attempt to Open the Black Box,” paper delivered at the cpsa Conference, Montreal 1972.Google Scholar