Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:13:01.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Undisciplined Constituency Campaign Behaviour in Canadian Federal Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2022

Jacob Robbins-Kanter Open the ORCID record for Jacob Robbins-Kanter [Opens in a new window]
Jacob Robbins-Kanter*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Studies, Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, QC J1M 1Z7, Canada
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholarly research suggests that Canadian election campaigns are centralized affairs, with party headquarters managing a disciplined campaign organization across 338 federal constituencies. At the same time, local realities can incentivize constituency campaigns to deviate from their parties. This article examines the extent of local campaign discipline, given these tensions between parties’ centralizing compulsions and countervailing forces that militate against party cohesion. The article relies on original data to identify and explain the extent of local campaign behaviour that defies central party preferences and directives. It draws from interviews with 87 former candidates and eight party strategists, as well as observational data gathered from 10 constituency campaigns during the 2019 federal election. The findings indicate a relatively high level of undisciplined constituency campaign behaviour during the 2015 and 2019 elections. The article contends that this behaviour stems from insubordination, innovation and incompetence within constituency campaigns.

Résumé

Résumé

Les recherches universitaires suggèrent que les campagnes électorales canadiennes sont fortement centralisées, les sièges des partis gérant une organisation de campagne disciplinée dans 338 circonscription fédérales. En même temps, les réalités locales peuvent inciter les campagnes de circonscriptions à s'écarter de la ligne de parti. Cet article examine l'étendue de la discipline des campagnes locales, compte tenu des tensions entre les compulsions centralisatrices des partis et les forces centrifuges qui militent contre la cohésion du parti. L'article s'appuie sur des données de première main pour déterminer et expliquer l'ampleur du comportement des campagnes locales qui défient les préférences et les directives du parti central. Il s'appuie sur des entretiens avec 87 anciens candidats et huit stratèges du parti, ainsi que sur des données d'observation recueillies dans dix campagnes de circonscription à l'occasion de l'élection fédérale de 2019. Les résultats indiquent un niveau relativement élevé de comportement indiscipliné dans les campagnes de circonscription lors des élections de 2015 et 2019. L'article soutient que ce comportement découle de l'insubordination, de l'innovation et de l'incompétence au sein des campagnes de circonscription.

Keywords

party disciplinelocal campaignspolitical partiesparticipant observationCanadaDiscipline de particampagnes localespartis politiquesobservation participanteCanada
Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 444 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Canadian Political Science Association (l’Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balmas, Meital, Rahat, Gideon, Sheafer, Tamir and Shenhav, Shaul. 2014. “Two Routes to Personalized Politics: Centralized and Decentralized Personalization.” Party Politics 20 (1): 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Colin. 2019. “Data-Driven Elections in Canada: What We Might Expect in the 2019 Federal Election Campaign?” Special issue, Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law (September): 277–90.Google Scholar
Blais, Andre and Lago, Ignacio. 2009. “A General Measure of District Competitiveness.” Electoral Studies 28 (1): 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blidook, Kelly and Koop, Royce. 2019. “Observing Representation: Participant Observation with Elected Officials.” In SAGE Research Methods Cases in Political Science and International Relations. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Bodet, Marc André. 2013. “Strongholds and Battlegrounds: Measuring Party Support Stability in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 575–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bøggild, Troels and Pedersen, Helene Helboe. 2018. “Campaigning on Behalf of the Party? Party Constraints on Candidate Campaign Personalisation.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (4): 883–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braid, Don. 2015. “Liepert Paints Woeful Picture of Campaign Quarrels, Lack of Respect.” Calgary Herald, October 21.Google Scholar
Brodie, Ian. 2018. At the Centre of Government: The Prime Minister and the Limits on Political Power. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth. 2002. “The Politics of Tecumseh Corners: Canadian Political Parties as Franchise Organizations.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 723–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth. 2004. “Parties as Franchise Systems: The Stratarchical Organizational Imperative.” Party Politics 10 (1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth. 2015. Big Tent Politics: The Liberal Party's Long Mastery of Canada's Public Life. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth and Eagles, Munroe. 2005. Politics Is Local: National Politics at the Grassroots. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chiru, Mihail. 2018. “Exploring the Role of Decentralized Personalization for Legislative Behaviour and Constituency Representation.” In The Personalization of Democratic Politics and the Challenge for Political Parties, ed. Cross, William, Katz, Richard S. and Pruysers, Scott. London: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Coletto, David, Jansen, Harold and Young, Lisa. 2011. “Stratarchical Party Organization and Party Finance in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 111–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, William. 2018. “Understanding Power-Sharing within Political Parties: Stratarchy as Mutual Interdependence between the Party in the Centre and the Party on-the-Ground.” Government and Opposition 53 (2): 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, William, Currie-Wood, Rob and Pruysers, Scott. 2020. “Money Talks: Decentralized Personalism and the Sources of Campaign Funding.” Political Geography 82: 102242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, William and Young, Lisa. 2015. “Personalization of Campaigns in an SMP System: The Canadian Case.” Electoral Studies 39 (3): 306–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie-Wood, Rob. 2020. “The National Growth of a Regional Party: Evidence of Linkages between Constituency Associations in the Conservative Party of Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 53 (3): 618–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farney, James and Koop, Royce. 2017. “The Conservative Party in Opposition and in Government.” In The Blueprint: Conservative Parties and their Impact on Canadian Politics, ed. Lewis, J. P. and Everitt, Joanna. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1990. Watching Politicians: Essays on Participant Observation. Berkeley: IGS Press, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Tom. 2013. “Something Blue: The Harper Conservatives as Garrison Party.” In Conservatism in Canada, ed. Farney, James and Rayside, David. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Tom. 2014. Winning Power: Canadian Campaigning in the Twenty-First Century. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Colm. 2018. “Is All Politics Local? Determinants of Local and National Election Campaigns.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (14): 1899–1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godbout, Jean-François. 2020. Lost on Division: Party Unity in the Canadian Parliament. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth. 2013. Gendered News: Media Coverage and Electoral Politics in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Brooke. 2017. “The Liberal Party of Canada: Rebuilding Resurgence and Return to Power.” In Canadian Parties in Transition: Recent Trends and New Paths to Research, ed. Gagnon, Alain and Tanguay, Brian. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kam, Christopher. 2009. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawulich, Barbara. 2005. “Participant Observation as a Data Collection Method.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6 (2): Art. 43.Google Scholar
Koop, Royce. 2011. Grassroots Liberals: Organizing for Local and National Politics. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Koop, Royce, Bastedo, Heather and Blidook, Kelly. 2018. Representation in Action: Canadian MPs in the Constituencies. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Marland, Alex. 2016. Brand Command: Canadian Politics and Democracy in the Age of Message Control. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Marland, Alex. 2020. Whipped: Party Discipline in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Marland, Alex, Esselment, Anna Lennox and Giasson, Thierry. 2017. “Welcome to Non-stop Campaigning.” In Permanent Campaigning in Canada, ed. Marland, Alex, Giasson, Thierry and Esselment, Anna Lennox. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Marland, Alex and Wagner, Angelia. 2020. “Scripted Messengers: How Party Discipline and Branding Turn Election Candidates and Legislators into Brand Ambassadors.” Journal of Political Marketing 19 (1–2): 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrane, David. 2019. The New NDP: Moderation, Modernization, and Political Marketing. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
McLean, Jamie. 2012. Inside the NDP War Room: Competing for Credibility in a Federal Election. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Munroe, Kaija Belfry and Munroe, H. D.. 2018. “Constituency Campaigning in the Age of Data.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musante, Kathleen. 2015. “Participant Observation.” In Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, ed. Russell Bernard, H. and Gravlee, Clarence C.. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Patten, Steve. 2017. “Databases, Microtargeting, and the Permanent Campaign: A Threat to Democracy?” In Permanent Campaigning in Canada, ed. Marland, Alex, Giasson, Thierry and Esselment, Anna Lennox. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Pridemore, William, Damphousse, Kelly and Moore, Rebecca. 2005. “Obtaining Sensitive Information from a Wary Population: A Comparison of Telephone and Face-to-Face Surveys of Welfare Recipients in the United States.” Social Science & Medicine 61 (5): 976–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pruysers, Scott and Cross, William. 2016. “Candidate Selection in Canada: Local Autonomy, Centralization, and Competing Democratic Norms.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (7): 781–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruysers, Scott and Cross, William. 2018. “Personalism and Election Campaigning: National and Local Dynamics.” In The Personalization of Democratic Politics and the Challenge for Political Parties, ed. Cross, William, Katz, Richard and Pruysers, Scott. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Richler, Noah. 2016. The Candidate: Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail. Toronto: Doubleday Canada.Google Scholar
Savoie, Donald. 2019. Democracy in Canada: The Disintegration of Our Institutions. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Sayers, Anthony. 1999. Parties, Candidates, and Constituency Campaigns in Canadian Elections. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Small, Tamara and Philpott, Jane. 2020. “The Independent Candidate.” In Inside the Campaign, ed. Marland, Alex and Giasson, Thierry. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Laura B., Lawlor, Andrea, Cross, William P. and Blais, André. 2019. Provincial Battles, National Prize? Elections in a Federal State. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Benjamin Allen, Islam, Mujahedul, de Geus, Roosmarijn, Goldberg, Jonah, McAndrews, John R., Mierke-Zatwarnicki, Alex, Loewen, Peter John and Rubenson, Daniel. 2019. “Local Candidate Effects in Canadian Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Allan. 2016. “Mounting a Local Campaign.” In The Canadian Federal Election of 2015, ed. Pammett, Jon and Dornan, Christopher. Toronto: Dundurn.Google Scholar
Uldam, Julie and McCurdy, Patrick. 2013. “Studying Social Movements: Challenges and Opportunities for Participant Observation.” Sociology Compass 7 (11): 941–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vastel, Marie. 2019. “Singh et Scheer embêtés par la Loi sur la laïcité.” Le Devoir, October 9.Google Scholar
Zittel, Thomas. 2015. “Constituency Candidates in Comparative Perspective—How Personalized Are Constituency Campaigns, Why, and Does It Matter?” Electoral Studies 39: 286–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittel, Thomas and Gschwend, Thomas. 2008. “Individualised Constituency Campaigns in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Candidates in the 2005 German Elections.” West European Politics 31 (5): 978–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar