No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Response to Mendelsohn's “Public Brokerage: Constitutional Reform and the Accommodation of Mass Publics”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 February 2005
Extract
Matthew Mendelsohn's “Public Brokerage: Constitutional Reform and the Accommodation of Mass Publics” offers an alternative to what he calls the “conventional wisdom” surrounding Canada's intractable constitutional quagmire. Unlike most analysts of the Canadian constitutional process, Mendelsohn advocates greater public input into constitution making. Indeed, he suggests that the principal problem lies with elites, not mass publics. Limiting the role of “elites” in “accommodation,” he argues, allows for the possibility of constitutional reconciliation. Mendelsohn, then, provides a service by infusing some fresh ideas into Canada's constitutional debate.
- Type
- Comment / Commentaire
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 593 - 601
- Copyright
- © The Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique