Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:12:54.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply: Rethinking Equal Opportunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Samuel V. LaSelva
Samuel V. LaSelva
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Professor Drummond has raised so many objections to my study of mandatory retirement that I cannot reply to all of them without taxing the patience of readers of this JOURNAL. But one of his criticisms articulates a conception of liberal justice under the Charter, and it is to this important issue that I shall confine my reply.

Type
Comment/Commentaire
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 597 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 LaSelva, Samuel V., “Mandatory Retirement: Intergenerational Justice and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” this JOURNAL 20 (1987), 149–62Google Scholar; Drummond, Robert J., “Comment on ‘Mandatory Retirement: Intergenerational Justice and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ by Samuel LaSelva,” this JOURNAL 21 (1988), 585–95.Google Scholar

2 Drummond, “Comment on ‘Mandatory Retirement,’” 595.

3 Cited in Potter, David M., People of Plenty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954), 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Drummond, “Comment on ‘Mandatory Retirement,’” 590.