Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:35:19.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Professionalism, Sociability and the Liberal Party in the Constituencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2010

Royce Koop
Royce Koop*
Affiliation:
Queen's University
*
Royce Koop, Department of Political Studies, Queen's University, Kingston Ontario, K7L 3N6. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Studies of the local organizations of Canadian political parties often neglect those organizations' small leadership groups, the local executives. This article explores and develops a classification of constituency association executives. Interviews and participant observation in the Liberal party's constituency associations reveal that executives differ in their personnel, internal relations, organization, leadership and permeability. The result of this analysis is the development of two distinct types of executives: professional and sociable. Preliminary analysis suggests that political factors—local electoral strength and the presence of members of Parliament—play a crucial role in determining the development of professional executives.

Résumé. L'étude des organisations locales des partis politiques canadiens tend à négliger le leadership de ces petites organisations, soit les comités exécutifs de comté. Cet article explore le sujet et établit une classification de ces comités. La conduite d'entrevues et une observation participative au sein des associations de circonscription du Parti libéral révèlent que les comités exécutifs diffèrent dans leur gestion des ressources humaines, leurs relations internes, leur organisation, leur leadership et leur perméabilité. Les résultats de ces analyses permettent de dégager deux types de comité exécutif de comté, soit le type social et le type professionnel. Des analyses préliminaires permettent aussi de suggérer que des facteurs politiques – la force du parti dans la circonscription et la présence d'un élu au Parlement – jouent un rôle crucial dans la formation d'un comité exécutif de type professionnel.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 893 - 913
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carty, R.K. 1991. Canadian Political Parties in the Constituencies. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Carty, R.K. 2002. “The Politics of Tecumseh Corners: Canadian Political Parties as Franchise Organizations.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35: 723–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R.K. 2004. “Parties as Franchise Systems: The Stratarchical Organizational Imperative.” Party Politics 10: 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R.K. and Eagles, Munroe. 2003. “Party Activity across Electoral Cycles: The New Brunswick Party System, 1979–94.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36: 381–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R.K. and Cross, William. 2006. “Can Stratarchically Organized Parties be Democratic? The Canadian Case.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16: 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R.K. and Eagles, Munroe. 2005. Politics is Local: National Politics at the Grassroots. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chenail, Ronald J. 1995. “Presenting Qualitative Data.” The Qualitative Report 2. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR2-3/presenting.html (November 26, 2009).Google Scholar
Clark, Alistair. 2004. “The Continued Relevance of Local Parties in Representative Democracies.” Politics 24: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coletto, David, Jansen, Harold and Young, Lisa. 2009. “Election Finance Law and Party Centralization in Canada.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Cross, William. 2007. “Policy Study and Development in Canadas Political Parties.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, ed. Dobuzinskis, Laurent, Howlett, Michael and Laycock, David. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott C. and Beck, Paul Allen. 1984. “Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” In Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment? ed. Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott C. and Beck, Paul Allen. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Denver, David and Hands, Gordon. 1997. Modern Constituency Electioneering: Local Campaigning in the 1992 General Election. London: Cass.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, Samuel. 1964. Political Parties. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
Fiske, Alan Page. 1990. “Relativity within Moose (‘Mossi’) Culture: Four Incommensurable Models for Social Relationships.” Ethos 18: 180–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1990. “Party as linkage: A vestigial function?” European Journal of Political Research 18: 143–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1: 5–28.Google Scholar
Koop, Royce. 2008. “Multi-Level Party Politics: The Liberal Party from the Ground Up.” Doctoral dissertation. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, David and Porter, Lyman W.. 1986. “The Snowball Effect: Turnover Embedded in Communication Networks.” Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liberal Party of Canada. 2006. Liberal Party of Canada Constitution. http://www.liberal.ca/pdf/docs/lpc-2009-constitution-en.pdf (September 16, 2009).Google Scholar
Liberal Party of Canada. 2009. National Rules for the Selection of Candidates for the Liberal Party of Canada. http://www.liberal.ca/pdf/docs/national-nomination-rules.pdf (September 16, 2009).Google Scholar
Mair, Peter and van Biezen, Ingrid. 2001. “Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980–2000.” Party Politics 7: 5–21.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prentice, Deborah A., Miller, Dale T. and Lightdale, Jenifer R.. 1994. “Asymmetries in Attachments to Groups and to Their Members: Distinguishing Between Common-Identity and Common-Bond Groups.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20: 484–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, Yuqing, Kraut, Robert and Kiesler, Sara. 2007. “Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities.” Organization Studies 28: 377–408.Google Scholar
Sayers, Anthony M. 1999. Parties, Candidates, and Constituency Campaigns in Canadian Elections. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 1996. Parties and Their Members: Organising for Victory in Britain and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smiley, Donald V. 1987. The Federal Condition in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Smith, Miriam. 2005. A Civil Society? Collective Actors in Canadian Political Life. Peterborough ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Thorburn, Hugh G. 1961. Politics in New Brunswick. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Manon and Pelletier, Réjean. 2001. “More Women Constituency Party Presidents: A Strategy for Increasing the Number of Women Candidates in Canada?” Party Politics 7: 157–90.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Reginald. 1977. The Government Party: Organizing and Financing the Liberal Party of Canada 1930–58. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolinetz, Stephen B. 2007. “Cycles and Brokerage: Canadian Parties as Mobilizers of Interest.” In Canadian Parties in Transition, ed. Gagnon, Alain-G. and Tanguay, A. Brian. 3rd ed.Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview.Google Scholar
Young, Lisa and Cross, William. 2002. “Incentives to Membership in Canadian Political Parties.” Political Research Quarterly 55: 547–69.Google Scholar