Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:16:30.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land and Politics in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Robert F. Adie
Robert F. Adie
Affiliation:
University of Winnipeg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the many volumes written on the “agrarian question” in Mexico, probably no subject has received as much attention as the ejido, village communal land. Whether polemical or objective, most of these works have been concerned with the ejido primarily in economic terms. Questions have been raised about its importance as an economic unit, government action to improve its output, and its reform or even abolition for economic reasons. Related studies have been concerned with the ejido in terms of social justice, that is, the extent to which and the ways in which the ejidatarios, members of the ejido, have benefitted from the revolution. A few studies have been sociological or anthropological in nature, examining the ejido in terms of how it reinforces or breaks down traditional social and cultural patterns. While utilizing the data presented in these various studies, this note is concerned with the political aspect of the ejido or more specifically, how the ejido is a device which, both alone and in conjunction with a subculture of poverty, allows political control to be exercised over a vast peasant population engaged for the most part in primitive agriculture while urban Mexico proceeds with industrialization.

In the early 1920s George McCutcheon McBride insisted in his major study of Mexican land tenure patterns that the Indians had to be kept on the land.

Type
Notes
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1975 , pp. 299 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Land Systems of Mexico (New York 1923), 171

2 A general discussion of industrialization in Mexico prior to 1910 can be found in Adie, Robert F., Agrarianism in the Mexican Political System, doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, 1970Google Scholar, “The Background of the Agrarian Myth.”

3 Wilkie, James W., The Mexican Revolution: Federal Expenditures and Social Change since 1910 (Berkeley 1967), 256.Google Scholar

This is a summary of “a manuscript in preparation for Yale University's Economic Growth Center” by Professor Clark W. Reynolds.

4 The Political Economy of Mexico (Madison 1963), 59

5 Chevalier, François, “Ejido y estabilidad en México” in Ciencias politicas y sociales XI, número 42 (Octubre/Diciembre 1965), 444Google Scholar

6 For a statistical description of this poverty see Wilkie, Mexican Revolution, “An Index of Poverty.”

8 Agricultural data in Mexico is incomplete and, because of definitional problems, quite inexact. See Brandenburg, Frank, The Making of Modern Mexico (Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1966), 253.Google Scholar

8 Flores, Edmundo, Tratado de economía agrícola (Mexico 1961), 307Google Scholar

9 Ibid., 322

10 Ibid., 308–9; and Whetten, Nathan, The Role of the Ejido in Mexican Land Reform, Discussion Paper 3, Land Tenure Center (Madison 1963), 5Google Scholar

11 Land Reform and Democracy (Gainesville, Fla. 1958), 91

12 There were only 900 collective type ejidos in 1960.

13 Belshaw, Michael, A Village Economy (New York 1967), 24Google Scholar

14 Rao, T.S., “El crédito rural en México,” in Investigación Económica XXII, número 88 (1962), 1091Google Scholar

15 Ibid., 1091

16 See Senior, Land Reform, 98–9; and Infield, H. and Freier, K., People in Ejidos (New York 1954), 74Google Scholar

17 Rao, “El credito rural” 1089–90

18 Land Reform, 99

19 Wolf, Eric R., “Aspects of Group Relations in a Complex Society: Mexico,” Contemporary Cultures and Societies of Latin America, ed. Heath, Dwight B. and Adams, Richard N. (New York 1965), 94Google Scholar

20 Brandenburg, Modern Mexico, 253

21 Flores, Edmundo, “Balance de la reforma agraria mexicana,” in Visión (9 de Mayo de 1969), 38Google Scholar

22 Chevalier, “Ejido,” 427

23 Powelson, John P., Latin America: Today's Economic and Social Revolution (New York 1964), 37Google Scholar

24 Wolf, “Group Relations,” 92

25 Rao, “El crédito rural,” 1115; and Valencia, Florencio Paloma, Historia del ejido actual (Mexico 1959), 23Google Scholar

26 Maddox, James G., Land Reform in Mexico (Washington, D.C. 1957), 12Google Scholar

27 Chevalier, “Ejido,” 428

28 Modern Mexico, 253–4

29 “Balance de la reforma agraria mexicana,” 38

30 Hurtado, Ernesto Fernández, “Private Enterprise and Government in Mexican Development,” in Mexico's Recent Economic Growth (Austin 1967), 61Google Scholar

31 Chevalier, “Ejido,” 430

32 Lewis, Oscar, “Mexico since Cárdenas,” in Adams, Richard N. and others, Social Change in Latin America Today (New York 1960), 341Google Scholar

33 For the Bank's early operation see Whetten, Nathan, Rural Mexico (Chicago 1948).Google Scholar

34 Rao, “El credito rural,” 1100

35 Herman Deutsch, El ejido y la integración de México

36 Maddox, Land Reform, 16

37 Rao, “El credito rural,” 1103

38 Fernández, Ramón and Acosta, Ricardo, El problema agrícola actual (Mexico 1961), 158Google Scholar

39 Chevalier, “Ejido,” 430

40 See Rao, “El credito rural,” 1110

41 Deutsch, el ejido, 24

42 Chevalier, “Ejido,” 431

43 183

44 Peña, Moisés T. de la, El pueblo y su tierra: mito y realidad de la reforma agraria en México (Mexico 1964), 761Google Scholar

45 Deutsch, El ejido, 61

46 Rao, “El credito rural,” 1097