Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:18:45.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La non-participation politique des jeunes : Une étude des barrières temporaires et permanentes de l'engagement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2012

Valérie-Anne Mahéo ,
Yves Dejaeghere  and
Dietlind Stolle
Valérie-Anne Mahéo*
Affiliation:
Université McGill
Yves Dejaeghere*
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Dietlind Stolle*
Affiliation:
Université McGill
*
Valérie-Anne Mahéo, Université McGill – Département de science politique, Édifice Leacock, Bureau 414, 855 rue Sherbrooke ouest, Montréal, Québec H3A 2T7 –Canada, [email protected]
Yves Dejaeghere, PhD, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven – Center for Citizenship and Democracy, Parkstraat 45 Box 3602, B-3000 Leuven –Belgique, [email protected]
Dietlind Stolle, Université McGill – Département de science politique, Édifice Leacock, Bureau 414, 855 rue Sherbrooke ouest, Montréal, Québec H3A 2T7 –Canada, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Résumé. Avec une méthodologie double, nous portons notre attention sur un groupe très peu étudié : les jeunes non-engagés. Grâce à des entrevues, nous distinguons quatre types de non-engagés: les critiques, ceux qui manquent de ressources politiques, les occupés, et ceux en attente de mobilisation. Les critiques ne représentent qu'une minorité des non-engagés, alors que les jeunes manquant de ressources sont plus nombreux. Cette étude démontre qu'une grande proportion de jeunes présente un potentiel d'engagement futur et que c'est principalement des barrières temporaires qui réduisent leur niveau d'engagement. L'analyse quantitative dévoile des variations d'attitudes, de profils démographiques et de volontés d'engagement entre types de non-engagés. Les non-engagés ne sont donc pas un groupe homogène.

Abstract. With a two-pronged methodology, this article takes a closer look at an understudied group: the disengaged youth. Using interviews, we discern four different types within this disengaged group: the criticals, those lacking political resources, the busy and those waiting for mobilization. The ‘criticals’ constitute only a minority of the disengaged group, while the young people who lack political resources are more common. Most importantly, a great proportion of young people show a certain potential for engagement. The quantitative analysis reveals that these types resemble distinct attitudinal and demographic profiles, and differ in their future willingness to participate. Thus the non-engaged are not a monolithic group.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 405 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel A. et Verba, Sidney. 1965. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton : Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bennet, Lance W. 1998. “1998 Ethiel De Sola Pool Lecture: The UnCivic Culture: Communication, Identity, and the Rise of Lifestyle Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics 31, 4: 740–761.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth et Nevitte, Neil. 2004. “Where Does Turnout Decline Come From?” European Journal of Political Research 43, 2: 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André et Rubenson, Daniel. 2008. “Turnout Decline: Generational Value Change or New Cohort's Response to Electoral Competition?” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bréchon, Pierre et Cautrès, Bruno. 1987. “L'inscription sur les listes électorales : Indicateur de socialisation ou de politisation ?” Revue française de science politique 37, 4: 502–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryman, Alan. 2008. Social Research Methods (third edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X. et Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven : Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Diplock, Shelagh. 2002. “Non-Voters, Political Disconnection and Parliamentary Democracy.” Parliamentary Affairs 55: 715–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Kathy. 2007. “From Deficit to Disenfranchisement: Reframing Youth Electoral Participation.” Journal of Youth Studies 10, 5: 539–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farthing, Rys. 2010. “The Politics of Youthful Antipolitics: Representing the ‘Issue’ of Youth Participation in Politics.” Journal of Youth Studies 13, 2: 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favre, Pierre et Offerlé, Michel. 2002. “Connaissances politiques, compétence politique ? Enquête sur les performances cognitives des étudiants français.” Revue française de science politique 52, 2-3: 201–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Mark N., Lyons, Patrick et Marsh, Michael. 2004. “Generational Basis of Turnout Decline in Established Democracies.” Acta Politica 39, 2: 115–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Aina. 2009. “Where Else Does Turnout Decline Come From? Education, Age, Generation and Period Effects in Three European Countries.” Scandinavian Political Studies 32, 1: 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaxie, Daniel. 2002. “Appréhensions du politique et mobilisations des expériences sociales.” Revue française de science politique 52, 2-3: 145–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Lisa et Munn, Jamie. 2007. “Gendered (Non)participants? What Constructions of Citizenship Tell Us about Democratic Governance in the Twenty-first Century.” Parliamentary Affairs 60, 3: 426–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henn, Matt, Weinstein, Mark et Forrest, Sarah. 2005. “Uninterested Youth? Young People's Attitudes towards Party Politics in Britain.” Political Studies 53: 556–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henn, Matt, Weinstein, Mark et Hodgkinson, Sarah. 2007. “Social Capital and Political Participation. Understanding the Dynamics of Young People's Political Disengagement in Contemporary Britain.” Social Policy and Society 6: 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Marc et Stolle, Dietlind. 2004. “Good girls go to the polling booth, Bad Boys go everywhere: Gender Differences in anticipated Political Participation Among American Fourteen-Year-Olds.” Women and Politics 26, 3-4:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Commons, Education and Skills Committee. 2007. Citizenship Education. Second Report of Session 2006–2007. London : The Stationary Office Limited. ⟨http://www.teachingcitizenship.org.uk/dnloads/final_report.pdf⟩ (consulté le 1er décembre 2008).Google Scholar
Ihl, Olivier. 2002. “Socialisation et événements politiques.” Revue française de science politique 52, 2-3: 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ion, Jacques. 2005. “Individualisation et engagement publics.” Dans Politiques de l'individualisme. Entre sociologie et philosophie, dir. Corcuff, Philippe, Ion, Jacques et de Singly, François. Paris : Les éditions Textuel.Google Scholar
Janmaat, Jan Germen. 2008. “The Civic Attitudes of Ethnic Minority Youth and the Impact of Citizenship Education.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34, 1:27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Richard et Soroka, Stuart. 2001. “Social Capital in a Multicultural Society. The Case of Canada.” Dans Social Capital and Participation in Everyday Life, dir. Dekker, Paul et Uslaner, Eric M.. London : Routledge.Google Scholar
Kimberlee, Richard H. 2002. “Why Don't British Young People Vote at General Elections?” Journal of Youth Studies 5, 1: 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Douglas. 1987. “Political Self-Efficacy Tested.” The American Political Science Review 81, 2: 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Michael. 1991. “Accident or Design? Non-Voting in Ireland.” Irish Political Studies 6, 1: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muxel, Anne. 2002. “La Participation Politique Des Jeunes: Soubresauts, fractures et Ajustements.” Revue française de science politique 52, 5: 521–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muxel, Anne. 2010. Avoir 20 ans en politique : les enfants du désenchantement. Paris : éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Oegema, Dirk et Klandermans, Bert. 1994. “Why Social Movement Symphatizers Don't Participate. Erosion and Nonconversion of Support.” American Sociological Review 59, 5: 703–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Toole, Therese. 2003. “Engaging with Young People's Conceptions of the Political.” Children's Geographies 1, 1: 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Toole, Therese, Marsh, Dave et Jones, Su. 2003. “Political Literacy Cuts Both Ways: The Politics of Non-Participation among Young People.” The Political Quarterly 74, 3: 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettersen, Per Arnt. 1989. “Comparing non-voters in the USA and Norway. Permanence Versus Transience.” European Journal of Political Research 17: 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Print, Murray. 2007. “Citizenship Education and Youth Participation in Democracy.” British Journal of Educational Studies 55, 3: 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Sale, Joanna, Lohfeld, Lynne et Brazil, Kevin. 2002. “Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research.” Quality & Quantity 36: 43–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherrod, Lonnie R. 2003. “Promoting the Development of Citizenship in Diverse Youth.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36, 2: 287–292.Google Scholar
Simard, Jean-Jacques. 1990. “Entre deux jeunesses, il faut choisir la moindre.” L'Action Nationale 80, 4: 367–399.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind, Harell, Allison, Mahéo, Valérie-Anne et Nishikawa, Laura. 2006. Enquête Canadienne de la Jeunesse – Canadian Youth Study. Montreal: McGill University. Data set.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind, Hooghe, Marc et Micheletti, Michele. 2005. “Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation.” International Political Science Review 26, 3: 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torney-Purta, Judith, Lehmann, Rainer, Oswald, Hans et Schulz, Wolfram. 2001. Citizenship and Education in Twenty-Eight Countries: Civic Knowledge and Engagement at Age Fourteen. Amsterdam: IEA.Google Scholar
Usalcas, Jeannine et Bowlby, Geoff. 2006. Students in the Labor Market. Ottawa: Statistics Canada ⟨http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-004-x/2006001/9184-eng.htm#i⟩ (consulté le 11 juin 2011)Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay L. et Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vultur, Mircea. 2003. “Le chômage des jeunes au Québec et au Canada : tendances et caractéristiques.” Relations industrielles / Industrial Relations 58, 2: 232–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zukin, Cliff, Keeter, Scott, Andolina, Molly, Jenkins, Krista et Delli Carpini, Michael X.. 2006. A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. New York : Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar