Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:52:46.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender vs. Diversity Mainstreaming: A Preliminary Examination of the Role and Transformative Potential of Feminist Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2005

Olena Hankivsky
Olena Hankivsky
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. This paper considers why gender mainstreaming (GM), a strategy that many have claimed holds promise for transforming public policy and working towards social justice, is inherently limited and flawed. The paper begins with a brief overview of GM, specifically focusing on the Canadian context, and highlights current discussions in the literature regarding issues of implementation and best practices. It then moves on to reveal that a critical but overlooked dimension of GM is its theoretical foundation. In contextualizing GM within a contemporary feminist theory framework, the paper seeks to illuminate the problematic relationship that currently exists between GM and feminist theory and, moreover, demonstrates why the theoretical premises of GM need significant reworking. The argument put forward is that if insights of recent feminist theorizing are taken seriously, it becomes clear that GM should be replaced by an alternative and broader strategy of diversity mainstreaming. Through the use of practical examples, the paper illustrates how diversity mainstreaming is able to better capture, articulate and make visible the relationship between simultaneously interlocking forms of oppressions that include but are not limited to gender.

Résumé. Cet article étudie pourquoi l'intégration d'une perspective de genre (IPG), une stratégie dans laquelle beaucoup ont vu la promesse d'une transformation de la politique publique et d'un progrès vers la justice sociale, est en soi limitée et défectueuse. L'article débute par un bref exposé sur l'IPG, s'intéressant principalement au contexte canadien, et il met en évidence les discussions actuelles dans la littérature au sujet de problèmes de mise en oeuvre et de pratiques exemplaires. Il révèle ensuite qu'une dimension critique mais négligée de l'IPG est son fondement théorique. En contextualisant l'IPG dans un cadre de théorie féministe contemporaine, l'article cherche à éclairer la relation problématique qui existe actuellement entre l'IPG et la théorie féministe et, de surcroît, démontre pourquoi les prémisses théoriques de l'IPG nécessitent une révision significative. L'argument avancé est que, si l'on prend au sérieux les conclusions des théories féministes récentes, il semble évident que l'IPG devrait être remplacée par une stratégie plus vaste d'intégration d'une perspective de diversité. S'appuyant sur des exemples pratiques, l'article montre que l'intégration d'une perspective de diversité réussit à mieux capturer, mettre en rapport et rendre visible la relation entre des formes d'oppression qui s'entrecroisent simultanément et qui incluent mais ne se limitent pas au genre.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 977 - 1001
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amaro, Hortensia and Anita Raj. 2000. “On the Margin: Power and Women's HIV Risk Reduction Strategies.” Sex Roles 42 (7/8): 723–749.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria E. and Analouise Keating. 2002. This Bridge we Call Home: Radical visions for transformation. New York: Routledge.
Armstrong, Pat. 2003. “Equality Recognition and the Distributive Paradigm.” http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Philosophy/Opp/Archives/002294.html (March 9, 2004).
Arneil, B. 1999. Politics and Feminism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Bacchi, C. 2001. “Managing Equity Mainstreaming and Diversity in Australian Universities” In Gender and the Restructured University, eds. A. Brooks and A. Mackinnon. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Baden, Sally and Anne Marie Goetz. 1997. “Who needs [sex] when you can have [gender]? Conflicting discourses on gender at Beijing.” Feminist Review 56: 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Cinnamon. 2000. Mainstreaming in Organizations: Strategies for Delivering Women's Equality in UK Local Government. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Sheffield Hallam University.
Beveridge, F. and S. Nott. 2002. “Mainstreaming: A Case for Optimism and Cynicism.” Feminist Legal Studies 10: 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, F., S. Nott and K. Stephen. 2000. “Mainstreaming and the engendering of policy-making: a means to an end?” Journal of European Public Policy 7 (3): 385–405.Google Scholar
Beveridge, F., S. Nott and K. Stephen. 2000. “Setting the Scene: The Why, What and How of Promoting Equality Between the Sexes.” In Making Women Count: Integrating gender into law and policy-making, eds. F. Beveridge, S. Nott and K. Stephen. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bhabha, H. 1994. The Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
Booth, C. and C. Bennett. 2002. “Gender Mainstreaming in the European Union: Towards a New Conception and Practice of Equal Opportunities?” The European Journal of Women's Studies 9 (4): 430–446.Google Scholar
Bretherton, C. 2001. “Gender Mainstreaming and EU enlargement: swimming against the tide?” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (1): 60–81.Google Scholar
Brown, W. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Burt, S. 1995. “The Several Worlds of Policy Analysis: Traditional Approaches and Feminist Critiques.” In Changing Methods: Feminists Transforming Practice, eds. S. Burt and L. Code. Toronto: Broadview Press: 357–378.
Burt, S. and S.L. Hardman. 2001. “The Case of Disappearing Targets: the Liberals and Gender Equality.” In How Ottawa Spends, ed. L. Pal. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
Bustelo, M. 2003. “The Evolution of Gender Equality Definition and its Consequences on Public Policies: The Case of Gender Equality Plans in Spain.” Paper presented at the ECPR 2nd General Conference, Marburg, September 18–21.
Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble. London: Routledge.
Canadian International Development Agency. 1999. CIDA's Policy on Gender Equality. Hull: Minister of Public Works and Government Services. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/institu.htm (August 29, 2004).
Carens, Joseph H. 2000. Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carney, G. 2003. “Communicating or Just Talking? Gender Mainstreaming and the Communication of Global Feminism.” Women and Language 26 (1): 52–61.Google Scholar
Carney, G. 2004. “Researching Gender Mainstreaming: A Challenge for Feminist IR.” Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Conference, Montreal.
Centre for Women's Global Leadership. 2004. “Background Briefing on Intersectionality.” Working Group on Women and Human Rights. http://www.cwgl.rutgers.ed/globalcetner/policy/bkdbrfintersec.html (April 2, 2004).
Chappell, L.A. 2002. Gendering Government: Feminist Engagement with the State in Australia and Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Collins, P.H. 1991. Black Feminist Though: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Collins, P.H. 2002. “Symposium on West and Fenstermaker's ‘Doing Difference.’” In Doing Gender, Doing Difference, eds. Sarah Fenstermaker and Candace West. New York: Routledge.
Commonwealth Secretariat, and Maritime Centre of Excellence for Women's Health. 2002. “A Gender Analysis of HIV/AIDS.” In Gender Mainstreaming in HIV/AIDS: Taking a Multisectoral Approach. Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre.
Crenshaw Williams, Kimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color.” Stanford Law Review 43(6): 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw Williams, Kimberlé. 2000. “Background Paper for the CERD Expert Meeting on the Gender-Related Aspects of Race Discrimination.” Held November 21–14 in Zagreb, Croatia. http://www.wicej.addr.com/wcar_docs/crenshaw.html (March 9, 2004).
Dhamoon, R. 2004. Private Correspondence.
Dietz, Mary G. 2003. “Current Controversies in Feminist Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 399–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Stefano, C. 1990. “Dilemmas of difference.” In Feminism/Postmodernism, ed. L. Nicholson. London: Routledge.
Donaghy, T.B. 2004a. “Mainstreaming: Northern Ireland's participative-democratic approach.” Policy and Politics 32:1: 49–62.Google Scholar
Donaghy, T.B. 2004b. “Applications of Mainstreaming in Australia and North Ireland.” International Political Science Review (25:4): 393–410.Google Scholar
Einarsdóttir, T. 2003. “Challenging the Slow Motion of Gender Equality—The Case of Iceland.” Paper presented at the 5th European Feminist Research Conference, Lund University, Sweden, August 22–24.
Fraser, N. and L. Nicholson. 1990. “Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism.” In Feminism/Postmodernism, ed. L. Nicholson. London: Routledge.
Greaves, L., O. Hankivsky, C. Amaratunga, P. Ballem, D. Chow, M. De Konick, K. Grant, A. Lippman, H. Maclean, J. Maher, K. Mesing and B. Vissandjee. 1999. CIHR 2000: Sex, Gender and Women's Health. Vancouver: British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health.
Hankivsky, O. and M. Morrow, with P. Armstrong. 2004. Trade Agreements, Home Care and Women's Health. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.
Hannan, C. 2001. “Gender Mainstreaming—A Strategy for Promoting Gender Equality: With Particular Focus on HIV/AIDS and Racism.” Paper presented at the NGO Consultation in preparation for the 45th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women. New York: NYU Medical Centre.
Haraway, Donna. 1990. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1990s.” In Feminism/Postmodernism, ed. Linda J. Nicholson. New York: Routledge
Harding, Sandra. 1995. “Just add women and stir?” In Missing Links: Gender Equity in Science and Technology for Development. Gender Working Group, United Nations Commission on Science and Technology for Development. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre in association with Intermediate Technology Publications and UNIFEM.
Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hartsock, Nancy. 1987. “The Feminist Standpoint: developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism.” In Feminism and Methodology, ed. Sandra Harding. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Haslanger, S. and N. Tuana. 2003. Topics in Feminism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-topics/ (March 9, 2004).
Health Canada. 2003. Exploring Concepts of Gender and Health. Contributing co-authors: A. Pederson, O. Hankivsky, M. Morrow, and L. Greaves. http://www.hcsc.gc.ca/english/women/exploringconcepts.htm (August 29, 2004).
Hegde, R.S. 1998. “A View from Elsewhere: Locating Difference and the Politics of Representation from a Transnational Feminist Perspective.” Communication Theory 8: 271–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, bell. 1996. Reel to real: race, sex, and class at the movies. New York: Routledge.
Human Resources Development Canada. 2003. Policy on Gender Analysis. Ottawa.
Indian, andNorthern Affairs Canada. 1999. Gender Equality Analysis Policy. Ottawa. http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/pr/pub/eql/eql_e.html (August 22, 2004).
Irigaray, L. 1993. An Ethics of Sexual Difference, translators G. Gill and C. Burke. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Jahan, Rounaq. 1995. The Elusive Agenda: Mainstreaming Women in Development. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Zed Books.
Jenson, Jane and Susan D. Phillips. 1996. “Regime shift: New Citizenship practices in Canada.” International Journal of Canadian Studies 14: 111–136.Google Scholar
Jhappan, Radha. 1996. “Post-Modern Race and Gender Essentialism or a Post Mortem of Scholarship.” Studies in Political Economy 51: 15–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabeer, Naila. 2003. Prepared for Commonwealth Secretariat/ICRC/CIDA. Gender Mainstreaming in Poverty Eradication and the Millennium Development Goals: A handbook for Policy-makers and Other Stakeholders. http://web.idrc.ca/ev.php?=42969_201&ID2-DO_TOPIC (July 23, 2004).
Kittay, E. Feder. 1998. “Social Policy.” In A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, eds. Alison M. Jagger and Iris Marion Young. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Kristeva, J. 1984. Revolution in Poetic Language, translator M. Waller. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister Outsider. New York: Crossing Press.
Mackay, F. and K. Bilton. 2003. Learning from Experience: Lessons in mainstreaming equal opportunities. Edinburgh: Governance of Scotland Forum, University of Edinburgh.
MacKinnon, C.A. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Marshall, Barbara L. 2000. Configuring Gender: Explorations in Theory and Politics. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1997. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” In The Women, Gender and Development Reader, eds. Nalini Visvanathan, Lynne Duggan, Laurie Nisonoff and Brenda Wyss. London: Zed Books.
Nott, S. 2000. “Accentuating the positive: Alternative strategies for promoting gender equality.” In Making Women Count: Integrating gender into law and policy-making, eds. F. Beveridge, S. Nott and K. Stephen. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Organization for Economic Cooperation, andDevelopment. 2004. Gender Mainstreaming. http://www1.oecd.org/subject/gender_mainstreaming/about/ (August 29, 2004).
Phillips, A. 1993. Democracy and Difference. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.
Phillips, A. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
Pollack, M.A. and E. Hafner-Burton. 2000. “Mainstreaming Gender in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 7 (3): 432–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prugl, Elizabeth. 2004. “From Equal Rights to Gender Mainstreaming: Feminist Politics in German Agriculture.” Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Conference, Montreal.
Rees, Teresa. 1998. Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union: Education, Training, and Labour Market Policies. London: Routledge.
Rees, Teresa. 2002. “Gender Mainstreaming: Misappropriated and Misunderstood?” Paper presented to the Department of Sociology, University of Sweden.
Russell, L. and M. Sawer. 1999. “The rise and fall of the Australian women's bureau.” Australian Journal of Politics and History 45 (3): 362–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawer, M. 1996. “Femocrats and Ecocrats: Women's Policy Machinery in Australia, Canada and New Zealand.” Part of the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development Occasional Paper Series, The Institutionalization of Gender Concerns within International and National Policy Machineries. New York: United Nations Publishing.
Schalkwyck, J. and B. Woroniuk. 1998. DAC Source Book on Concepts and Approaches linked to gender equality. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Development Assistance Committee.
Sjoroup, K. 2001. “The Case of Denmark.” In Gender Mainstreaming in the European Employment Strategy, eds. U. Behning and A. Serrano. Brussels: ETUI.
Spalter-Roth, R. and R. Schreiber. 1995. “Outsider Issues and Insider Tactics: Strategic Tensions in the Women's Policy Network during the 1980s.” In Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women's Movement, eds. M. Marx Feree and P. Yancey Martin. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Spellman, E.V. 1988. Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.
Squires, Judith. 1999. Gender in Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Squires, Judith and Mark Wickham-Jones. 2002. “Mainstreaming in Westminster and Whitehall: From Labour's Ministry of Equality to the Women and Equality Unit.” Parliamentary Affairs 55: 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Status of Women Canada. 1995. Setting the Stage For the Next Century: The Federal Plan for Gender Equality. http://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/pubs/066261951X/199508_066261951X_6_e.html (August 29, 2004).
Status of Women Canada. 1996. Gender-based analysis: A guide for policy-making. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.
Status of Women Canada. 2002. Canadian Experience in Gender Mainstreaming 2001. Ottawa: Gender Based Analysis Directorate.
Stetson, D. and Amy Mazur. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. New York: Sage Publications.
Stone, D.A. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104: 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teghtsoonian, Katherine. 1999. Centring Women's Diverse Interests in Health Policy and Practice: A Comparative Discussion of Gender Analysis. Halifax: Atlantic Centre of Excellence for Women's Health.
Teghtsoonian, Katherine. 2000. “Gendering Policy Analysis in the Government of British Columbia: Strategies, Possibilities and Constraints.” Studies in Political Economy 61: 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, Jacqui and Michael Mintrom. 2001. “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming.” International Studies Quarterly 45: 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. 1995. FWCW Platform for Action. Institutional Mechanisms for the Advancement of Women. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/institu.htm (August 29, 2004).
Verloo, Mieke. 2000. “Making women count in the Netherlands.” In Making Women Count, eds. Fiona Beveridge, Susan Nott and Stephen Kylie. Adlershot: Ashgate.
Verloo, Mieke. 2001. “Another Velvet Revolution? Gender Mainstreaming and the Politics of Implementation.” IWM Working Paper no. 5. Vienna.
Vickers, Jill. 1997. Reinventing Political Science. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
Vlassov, C. and C. Garcia Moreno. 2002. “Placing gender at the centre of health programming: challenges and limitations.” Social Science of Medicine 54: 1713–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, L. and M. Inhorn. 2001. “Rethinking Difference: A Feminist Reframing of Gender/Race/Class for the Improvement of Women's Health Research.” The Social Construction of Health and Disease 3(1): 147–165.Google Scholar
Woodward, Alison E. 2001. “Gender Mainstreaming in European Policy: Innovation or Deception?” Discussion paper FSS 01-103. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforscung.
Woodward, Alison E. 2003. “European Gender Mainstreaming: Promises and Pitfalls of Transformative Policy.” Review of Policy Research 20, 1: 65–88.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1994. “Gender as Seriality: Thinking About Women as a Social Collective.” Signs 19 (3): 713–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. Gender and Nation. London: Sage Publications.
Zierler, S and N. Krieger. 1995. Accounting for the health of women. Current Issues in Public Health 1: 251–256.Google Scholar