Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:12:26.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Empire, Crown and Canadian Federalism*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

David E. Smith
David E. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that imperialism and the Crown have determined the development of Canadian federalism. It maintains that the prominence of the provinces, the most distinctive feature of this country's federal system, is traceable, first, to the empire's evolution in the last century and its dissolution in this and, second, to the capacity of the Crown to endow the provinces with unlimited potential for action in areas of jurisdiction not assigned to Parliament. The structuring effect of these primary influences is examined from several perspectives: geographic, economic, social and constitutional. The article concludes that the provinces have been the true beneficiaries of Canada's heritage of empire and Crown.

Résumé

L'empire et la Couronne ont déterminé le développement du fédéralisme canadien. La prééminence des provinces—le trait le plus distinctif du système fédéral de ce pays—est liée en premier lieu à l'évolution de l'empire et à sa dissolution en ce siècle et, en second lieu, à la capacité de la Couronne de doter les provincers d'un potentiel illimité d'action dans des sphères de juridiction non-assignées au Parlement. L'effet structurant de ces influences de première importance est examiné dans cet article de plusieurs points de vue: géographique, économique, social et constitutionnel. Il est montré en conclusion que les provinces ont été les bénéficiaires privilégiés de l'héritage canadien de l'empire et de la Couronne.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 451 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On the metamorphosis of loyalties, see Lower, A. R. M., “The Origins of Democracy,” in Heick, Welf H., ed., History and Myth: Arthur Lower and the Making of Canadian Nationalism (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1975), 26Google Scholar.

2 Winks, Robin W., The Relevance of Canadian History: U.S. and Imperial Perspectives, The 1977 Joanne Goodman Lectures, University of Western Ontario (Toronto: Macmillan, 1979), Part 3Google Scholar.

3 Quoted in Lingard, C. Cecil, Territorial Government in Canada: The Autonomy Question in the Old North-West Territories (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1946), 106Google Scholar.

4 Scott, Stephen A., “Queens as Nursing-Mothers: Federal Public Expenditure under the Canadian Constitution,”draft of paper delivered at a conference at the University of Calgary,October 12–13, 1990Google Scholar on “The Power of the Purse: Financial Incentives as Regulatory Instruments,” 63.

5 Romney, Paul, “From the Rule of Law to Responsible Government: Ontario's Political Culture and the Origins of Canadian Statism,”in Historical Papers (a selection from the papers presented at the annual meeting [Canadian Historical Association] held at Windsor, 1988), 114Google Scholar, and Stewart, Gordon T., The Origins of Canadian Politics: A Comparative Approach (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1986), 70Google Scholar.

6 Marshall, Geoffrey, Constitutional Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971), chap. 2Google Scholar. For a Canadian source that discusses the same ambiguity of terminology, see Mundell, David W., “Legal Nature of Federal and Provincial Executive Governments: Some Comments on Transactions Between Them,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 2 (1960), 56–75.Google Scholar

7 Lower, A. R. M., “Religion and Religious Institutions,” in Heick, , ed., History and Myth, 75Google Scholar.

8 Taylor, C. James, “National Historic Parks and Sites, 1880–1951: The Biography of a Federal Cultural Program” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Carleton University, 1986), 52Google Scholar.

9 MacFarlane, R. O., “Manitoba Politics and Parties after Confederation,” Canadian Historical Association Report (1940), 46Google Scholar.

10 Herbert, A. P., Independent Member (London: Methuen, 1950), 409–410Google Scholar, emphasis in original.

11 Simpson, Jeffrey, Spoils of Power: The Politics of Patronage (Toronto: Collins, 1988), 52Google Scholar; see all of chap. 2, “Responsible Government: The British Legacy.”

12 Bailey, Alfred Goldsworthy, “Evidences ofCulture Considered as Colonial,” Culture and Nationality: Essays by A. G. Bailey (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1972), 184CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Innis, Harold A., “On the Economic Significance of Cultural Factors,” Political Economy in the Modern State (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1946), 88Google Scholar.

14 Wheare, K. C., Federal Government (3rd ed.; London: Oxford University Press, 1953), 19–21Google Scholar.

15 Scott, F. R., “Centralization and Decentralization in Canadian Federalism,” Canadian Bar Review 29 (1951), 1095–1125Google Scholar, reprinted in Scott, , Essays on the Constitution (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977), 252Google Scholar.

16 MacKinnon, Frank, The Crown in Canada (Calgary: Glenbow Alberta Institute, 1977), 162Google Scholar.

17 Veilleux, Gérard, Les relations intergouvernementales an Canada, 1867–1967: les mécanismes de coopération (Montreal: Les Presses de l'Université du Québec, 1971), chap. 1Google Scholar, “Les Lieutenants-Governeurs et le Secrétaire d'État pour les Provinces, 1867–1887.”

18 Liquidators of the Maritime Bank v. Receiver-General of New Brunswick (1892) AC. 437.

19 Namier, Lewis B., “Monarchy and the Party System,” The Romanes Lecture, 05 15, 1952 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952), 3Google Scholar.

20 Beer, Samuel, “Federalism, Nationalism and Democracy in America,” American Political Science Review 72 (1978), 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Elkins, David J. and Simeon, Richard, Small Worlds: Provinces and Parties in Canadian Political Life (Toronto: Methuen, 1980)Google Scholar, and Careless, J. M. S., “‘Limited Identities’ in Canada,” Canadian Historical Review 50 (1969), 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Morton, W. L., “The Extension of the Franchise in Canada: A Study in Democracy,” Canadian Historical Association Report (1943). 79Google Scholar.

23 See Aunger, Edmund A., In Search of Political Stability: A Comparative Study of New Brunswick and Northern Ireland (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1981)Google Scholar.

24 Romney, “From the Rule of Law to Responsible Government,” 116.

25 Ibid. The argument in this and the next paragraph was assisted by helpful comments of an anonymous Journal assessor, whom the author would like to thank for clarifying his thoughts on the interrelationship of province, nation and empire.

26 Hromnysky, Roman, “The Western Canadian Regional Governments and the Federal System, 1900–1930” (unpublished M.A. thesis, University of British Columbia, 1965), 187Google Scholar.

27 Saskatchewan Archives Board, Papers of the Rt. Hon. James G. Gardiner, Gardiner to W. H. Heffernan, March 25, 1939, 42777–8.

28 See McLeod, Thomas H., “Public Enterprise in Saskatchewan: the Development of Public Policy and Administrative Controls” (1958)Google Scholar and Johnson, Albert W., “Biography of a Government: Policy Formation in Saskatchewan, 1944–1961” (1963) both Ph.D. dissertations, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar; Brooks, Stephen and Tanguay, A. Brian, “Quebec's Caisse de dépôt et placement: tool of nationalism?” Canadian Public Administration 28 (1985), 99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 See Mandel, Michael, The Charter of Rights and the Legalization of Politics in Canada (Toronto: Wall and Thompson, 1989)Google Scholar. In the Manitoba Language Rights Reference (1985), the Supreme Court of Canada temporarily validated unilingual laws it had unanimously found invalid. In response, one judge of the Manitoba Court of Appeal asserted: “I do not understand how the Supreme Court or any other court has a power to declare judicially valid or enforceable that which is judicially invalid. I do not understand… an usurpation by acourt of the royal power” (114, footnote 1); see also 24–32 on constitutional convention and the Court.

30 United Kingdom, House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, Report of… on the British North America Acts: The Role of Parliament (London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1981)Google Scholar.

31 Verney, Douglas V., Three Civilizations, Two Cultures, One State: Canada's Political Traditions (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1986), 151Google Scholar.

32 This Journal 4 (1971), 301–45.

33 Robinson, Jonathan, “Lord Haldane and the British North America Act,” University of Toronto Law Journal 20 (1970), 55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 7 App. Cas. 829.

35 F. R. Scott, “The British North America (no. 2) Act,” in Scott, Essays, 205.

36 Senate Reference, I (1979) 102 D.L.R. (3d); Constitution of Canada Reference, I (1981) 125 D.L.R. (3d).

37 Berger, Carl, The Sense of Power: Studies in the Ideas of Canadian Imperialism, 1867–1914 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1970)Google Scholar.

38 Massicotte, Louis, “L'Assemblée Nationale du Québec: La Synthèse Réussie de la Culture Française et du Parlementarisme Britannique,”paper presented to Conference on the Parliamentary Tradition in Canada,Quebec City, 1987, 9–10Google Scholar.

39 Leacock, Stephen, My Discovery of the West: A Discussion of East and West in Canada (Boston: Hale, Cushman and Flint, 1937), 162Google Scholar. Two decades later, J. A. Laponce noted that “only two minor terms… have come from the United States: Progressive and Democrat” (“Canadian Party Labels: An Essay in Semantics and Anthropology,” this Journal 2 “1969”, 149.Google Scholar

40 Brown, George W., “Canada in the Making,” Canadian Historical Association Report (1944), 14Google Scholar.

41 See Sproule-Jones, Mark, “The Enduring Colony? Political Institutions and Political Science in Canada,” Publius 14 (1984) 93–108Google Scholar.

42 Brady, Alexander, Democracy in the Dominions: A Comparative Study of Institutions (3rd ed.; Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1958), 133, 150Google Scholar.

43 Beer, “Federalism, Nationalism and Democracy in America,” 12.

44 Nathan, Richard P., “The Role of the States in American Federalism,”paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1987, 17.Google Scholar