Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:05:58.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Critique of Seymour M. Lipset's Article, “Value Differences, Absolute or Relative: The English-speaking Democracies”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Tom Truman
Affiliation:
McMaster University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lipset, Seymour M., The First New Nation: The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective (Garden City, NY, 1967), 240–2, 284–5.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., 242–3.

4 Ibid., 244.

5 Ibid., 297.

6 Alford, Robert, Party and Society (Chicago, 1965), 117.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., 116.

8 Lipset, The First New Nation, 299.

9 Kernaghan, Kenneth, “Civil Liberties and Constitutional Bill of Rights,” in Vaughan, F., Kyba, J. P., and Dwivedi, O. P., Contemporary Issues in Canadian Politics (Toronto, 1970), 74–5.Google Scholar

10 Lower, Arthur M., Colony to Nation: A History of Canada (4th ed., Toronto, 1964), 516.Google Scholar

11 Vaughan et al, Contemporary Issues in Canadian Politics, 71–2.

12 Ibid., 69.

13 Stouffer, Samuel A., Communism, Conformity and Civil Liberties (Garden City, 1955), 3546.Google Scholar

14 Webb, L. C., “Political Review,” The Australian Quarterly, XXXI, no 4 (Dec. 1959), 91–2.Google Scholar

15 Lipset, The First New Nation, 300.

16 Keesing's Contemporary Archives, London VIII, 1950–2, 11060A, Nov. 4–11, 1950.

17 By contrast, at the Australian peace congress the left-wing of the Labor party and the trade union movement was well represented and the delegation included both federal and state members of parliament. No warnings about Congress were issued by any of the party's office holders. However, it should be stated that the members and supporters of the Catholic Action movement which had organized the anti-communist ALP Industrial Groups had split off from the Labor party after their defeat in a show-down with the left-wing at the federal conference in 1955. After leaving the Labor party they formed a rival party called the Democratic Labor party. The DLP was loud in its condemnation of the peace congress as a communist-run propaganda stunt. Had the DLP remained in the position of power in the ALP that they held prior to 1955, it is very probably that there would have been no Labor party support, official or unofficial, for the peace congress.

19 Ibid., 11220, Jan. 20–7, 1950.

20 Lipset, The First New Nation, 262–6.

21 The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society, Task Force report, “Crime and Its Impact,” p. 1.

22 Ibid., 191.

23 The First New Nation, 292, n. 17.

25 Evatt, H. V., Australian Labor Leader (Sydney, 1945), 97.Google Scholar

26 Parker, R. S., “The People and the Constitution,” in Sawer, G.et al., Federalism in Australia (Melbourne, 1949), 141.Google Scholar

27 Ward, Russell, Australia (Englewood Cliffs, 1965), 91.Google Scholar

28 The First New Nation, 299.

29 Lower, Colony to Nation, 503–5, and Rodney, William, Soldiers of the International (Toronto, 1968), 23–7.Google Scholar

30 Lipset, S. M., “The Sources of the Radical Right,” in Bell, Daniel, ed., The Radical Right (Garden City, 1964), 311–13.Google Scholar

31 Newman, Peter C., Renegade in Power: The Diefenbaker Years (2nd paperback ed., Toronto, 1968Google Scholar).

32 Bell, ed., The Radical Right, 374–446.

33 Ibid., 281.

34 The Economist of July 19–25, 1969 thought that Reginald Maudling, the Chancellor of the Exchequer in the previous Conservative government, was right when he said, “Ours is a system of dictatorship by majority party.”

35 Eckstein, Harry, “The Sources of Leadership and Democracy in Britain,” in Beer, Samuel H. and Ulam, Adam B., eds., Patterns of Government (New York, 1966), 74–7.Google Scholar

36 Neustadt, Richard E., Presidential Power (New York, 1964Google Scholar).

37 Lipset, The First New Nation, 287.

38 For a discussion of the motivations of the Canadian government in forming the North-West Mounted Police and its relations with the Americans, see Denny, Sir Cecil E., The Law Marches West (London, 1939Google Scholar).

39 See Shinn, Charles M., Mining Camps (New York, 1965Google Scholar), chaps. 12, 13, 16, and 17.

40 The Australian respectable classes, that is. Australians on the California goldfields had a bad reputation as robbers and thieves. They seemed to have included a large proportion of ex-convicts.

41 See Monaghan, Jay, Australians and the Gold Rush (Berkeley, 1966), 135–6, 183–93.Google Scholar

42 See Berton, Pierre, Klondike (Toronto, 1963), 333–65.Google Scholar

43 Adney, Tappan, The Klondike Stampede (New York, 1900), 440–3.Google Scholar

44 See the Eureka, Centenary Supplement in Historical Studies Australia and New Zealand (Melbourne, Dec. 1954Google Scholar).

45 Scott, Sir Robert, ed., Lord Robert Cecil's Goldfield's Diary (Melbourne, 1945Google Scholar).

46 The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society, Task Force report, “The Police,” 202–12.

47 Lipset, Seymour M., “Why Cops Hate Liberals and Vice Versa,” The Atlantic Monthly, special supplement: “The Police and the Rest of Us” (March 1969), 7683.Google Scholar

48 Editorial comment, ibid., 75.

49 Ibid., 121.

50 See The Globe and Mail, Feb. 17, 1969, p. 5.

51 See Dougherty, Richard, ex-deputy police commissioner of New York, “Requiem for the Center Street Mafia,” Atlantic Monthly (March 1969), 110.Google Scholar

52 The First New Nation, 241.

53 Ibid., 116 (italics added).

54 Lane, Robert E., Political Ideology (New York, 1962Google Scholar), chap. 4.

55 Lasch, Christopher, The Agony of the American Left (New York, 1969), 35.Google Scholar

56 Lipset, S. M., Agrarian Socialism (Berkeley, 1950), 1113.Google Scholar

57 Ibid., 13–16.

58 Hartz, Louis, The Liberal Tradition in America (New York, 1955Google Scholar).

59 Potter, David, The People of Plenty (Chicago, 1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar).

60 Perlman, Selig, A Theory of the Labor Movement (New York, 1928Google Scholar). See also Lasch, The Agony of the American Left, 3–59.

61 Horowitz, Gad, “Conservatism, Liberalism and Socialism: An Interpretation,” in Thorburn, Hugh G., ed., Party Politics in Canada (2nd ed., Toronto, 1967Google Scholar).

62 Young, Walter D., The Anatomy of a Party: The National CCF (Toronto, 1969), 13.Google Scholar

63 Ford, Patrick, Cardinal Moran and the ALP (Melbourne, 1966), 97.Google Scholar

64 Ibid., 278.

65 Ward, Australia, 78.

66 Party and Society, chap. 7.

67 Ibid., 177. See also Burns, Creighton, Parties and People (Melbourne, 1961), 7380.Google Scholar

68 Young, The Anatomy of a Party, 16.

69 See, Seventh Census of Canada (Ottawa, 1931), vol. IV, Table 21.

70 Young, The Anatomy of a Party, 26.

71 Sanford Silverstein, “Occupational Class and Voting Behavior: Electoral Support of Left-Wing Protest Movement in a Period of Prosperity,” in the Anchor book edition of Lipset's, Agrarian Socialism (New York, 1968), 436–76.Google Scholar

72 Jacek, Henry, McDonough, John, Shimizu, Ronald, and Smith, Patrick, “Federal-Provincial Integration in Ontario Party Organizations: The Influence of Recruitment Patterns,” unpublished paper, delivered at the 1970 meeting of CPSA, Winnipeg, June 3, 1970.Google Scholar

73 Lower, Colony to Nation, 524.

74 Lumb, R. D., The Constitutions of the Australian States (Brisbane, 1963), 46, 47.Google Scholar

75 Lower, Colony to Nation, 243.

76 Ibid., 404, 469.

77 A natomy of a Party, 8.