Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:24:01.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 1971 Survey of the Profession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

W.H.N. Hull
W.H.N. Hull
Affiliation:
Brock University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the winter of 1970–1, about 1000 questionnaires were sent to members of the Canadian Political Science Association and la Société canadienne de science politique and to known political scientists outside the two associations with a view to procuring information about political scientists and the state of research, publication, and funding in Canada.

Type
Notes
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1973 , pp. 89 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 R.R. March and R.J. Jackson, “Aspects of the State Of Political in Canada,” Midwest Journal of Political Science, XI, 433–50.

2 One respondent suggested the following for PHD work: $10,000–$20,000 for each qualified PHD writer, $2,000–$5,000 for each PHD supervisor, 25 per cent off regular teaching duties for each supervisor.

3 It is perhaps worth noting, by way of partial verification of the reliability of the returns, that our respondents show grants totalling $1,184,466 from the Canada Council, about 72 per cent of the grants shown in the Council's reports, 1965–66 to 1969–70, to political scientists in the form of post-doctoral fellowships, leave grants, research grants and Killam Awards ($1,648,000).