Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:53:09.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sages, Sympathy, and Suffering in Kant’s Theory of Friendship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2022

Benjamin Vilhauer
Benjamin Vilhauer*
Affiliation:
City College and Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kant’s theory of friendship is crucial in defending his ethics against the longstanding charge of emotional detachment. But his theory of friendship is vulnerable to this charge too: the Kantian sage can appear to reject sympathetic suffering when she cannot help a suffering friend. I argue that Kant is committed to the view that both sages and ordinary people must suffer in sympathy with friends even when they cannot help, because sympathy is necessary to fulfill the imperfect duty to adopt others’ merely permissible ends (MPEs), and we ought to take friends’ MPEs as our own. MPEs are individuated in terms of concepts which include marks of the first person, and no marks of law other than permissibility. To adopt ends of others individuated in terms of such concepts rather than merely promote them as means to different ends, those concepts must engage with one’s feelings in a way that requires sympathy.

Keywords

Kantethicspractical reasonmoral psychologysympathyempathyfriendshipsagepainsufferingvirtueimperfect dutyendsteleologyfirst personfeelingemotion
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 51 , Issue 6 , August 2021 , pp. 452 - 467
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, Marcia. 1995. Kantian Ethics Almost without Apology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia. 2013. “Friendship, Duties Regarding Specific Conditions of Persons, and the Virtues of Social Intercourse, (TL 6:468–74).” In Kant’s Tugendlehre: A Comprehensive Commentary, edited by Andreas Trampota, Oliver Sensen, and Jens Timmermann, 365–82. Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret. 2010. Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix. 2008. “The Ultimate Kantian Experience: Kant on Dinner Parties.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (4): 315–36.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara. 2000. “Kant’s Cold Sage and the Sublimity of Apathy.” Kantian Review 4: 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, Melissa Seymour. 2009. “Active Sympathetic Participation: Reconsidering Kant’s Duty of Sympathy.” Kantian Review 14 (1): 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, Melissa Seymour. 2010. “Kantian Practical Love.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3): 313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2010. “Moral Feelings in the Metaphysics of Morals.” In Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, edited by Lara Denis, 130–51. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Carol. 2013. Kantianism, Liberalism, and Feminism: Resisting Oppression. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbara, Herman. 1993. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hurter, Sarah, Paloyelis, Yannis, de C. Williams, Amanda C., and Fotopoulou, Aikaterini. 2014. “Partners’ Empathy Increases Pain Ratings: Effects of Perceived Empathy and Attachment Style on Pain Report and Display.” The Journal of Pain 15 (9): 934–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1924. Eine Vorlesung Kants über Ethik. Im Auftrag der Kantgesellschaft herausgegeben von Paul Menzer. Edited by Menzer, Paul. Berlin-Charlottenburg: Pan Verlag Rolf Heise.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1979. Kant’s gesammelte Schriften: Vorlesungen über Moralphilosophie, Band 27, Hälfte 2, T1 2, edited by der Wissenschaften, Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie. Berlin: Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1993. Opus Posthumum. Translated by Förster, Eckart and Rosen, Michael, edited by Förster, Eckart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996a. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996b. Religion and Rational Theology. Translated and edited by Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1997a. Lectures on Ethics. Translated by Heath, Peter, edited by Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1997b. Lectures on Metaphysics. Translated and edited by Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric, edited by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2007. Anthropology, History and Education. Translated by Gregor, Mary, Guyer, Paul, Louden, Robert B., Wilson, Holly, Wood, Allen W., Zöller, Günter, and Zweig, Arnulf; edited by Zöller, Günther and Robert, B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2012. Lectures on Anthropology. Translated by Clewis, Robert B., Louden, Robert B., Felicitas Munzel, G., and Wood, Allen W.; edited by Wood, Allen W. and Louden, Robert B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2012. “Relating Aesthetic and Sociable Feelings to Moral and Participatory Feelings: Reassessing Kant on Sympathy and Honor.” In Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide, edited by Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard, 101–15. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Sarah Clark. 2012. The Ethics of Need: Agency, Dignity, and Obligation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paton, H. J. 1956. ‘‘Kant on Friendship.’’ Proceedings of the British Academy 42: 45–66.Google Scholar
Paytas, Tyler. 2015. “Rational Beings with Emotional Needs: The Patient-Centered Grounds of Kant’s Duty of Humanity.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 32 (4): 353–76.Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy. 1997. Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Krista K. 2017. “A Good Enough Heart: Kant and the Cultivation of Emotions.” Kantian Review 22 (3): 441–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens. n.d. Kant’s Theory of Sympathy. Unpublished book manuscript.Google Scholar
Varden, Helga. 2020a. Sex, Love, and Gender: A Kantian Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varden, Helga. 2020b. “Kantian Care.” In Caring for Liberalism: Dependency and Political Theory, edited by Amy Baehr and Asha Bhandary, 50–74. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilhauer, Benjamin. 2021a. “‘Reason’s Sympathy’ and its Foundations in Productive Imagination.” Kantian Review 26 (3): 455–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilhauer, Benjamin. 2021b. “‘Reason’s Sympathy’ and Others’ Ends in Kant.” European Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen. 1999. Kant’s Ethical Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen. 2008. Kantian Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar