Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:13:25.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rehabilitating Objectivity: Rorty, Brandom, and the New Pragmatism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Steven Levine
Steven Levine*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Boston, Boston, MA02125, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years, a renascent form of pragmatism has developed which argues that a satisfactory pragmatic position must integrate into itself the concepts of truth and objectivity. This New Pragmatism, as Cheryl Misak calls it, is directed primarily against Rorty's neo-pragmatic dismissal of these concepts. For Rorty, the goal of our epistemic practices should not be to achieve an objective view, one that tries to represent things as they are ‘in themselves,’ but rather to attain a view of things that can gain as much inter-subjective agreement as possible. In Rorty's language, we need to replace the aim of objectivity with that of solidarity. While the New Pragmatists agree with Rorty's ‘humanist’ and ‘anti-authoritarian’ notion that the world by itself cannot dictate to us what we should think about it, they demur from his suggestion that this requires us to give up the notions of truth and objectivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 567 - 589
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, R. J. 1971. ‘The Challenge of Scientific Materialism,’ in Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem, Rosenthal, D. ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 2000a. ‘Vocabularies of Pragmatism: Synthesizing Naturalism and Historicism,’ in Brandom 2000b.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 2000a. ‘Vocabularies of Pragmatism: Synthesizing Naturalism and Historicism,’ in Brandom ed. 2000b. Rorty and his Critics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 2000a. ‘Vocabularies of Pragmatism: Synthesizing Naturalism and Historicism,’ in Brandom ed. 2002. ‘Non-inferential Knowledge, Perceptual Experience, and Secondary Qualities: Placing McDowell's Empiricism,’ in Reading McDowell: On Mind and World, Smith, N.H. ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 2000a. ‘Vocabularies of Pragmatism: Synthesizing Naturalism and Historicism,’ in Brandom ed. 2004. ‘No Experience Necessary: Empiricism, Non-inferential Knowledge, and Secondary Qualities,’ unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 2000a. ‘Vocabularies of Pragmatism: Synthesizing Naturalism and Historicism,’ in Brandom ed. 2008. ‘An Arc of Thought: From Rorty's Eliminative Materialism to his Pragmatism,’ unpublished manuscript, available at http://www.pitt.edu/∼brandom/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. 1981. ‘The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy,’ in The Philosophy of John Dewey, McDermott, J. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levine, S. 2008. ‘Rorty, Davidson, and the New Pragmatists,’ Philosophical Topics 36: 167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 2000. ‘Towards Rehabilitating Objectivity,’ in Brandom 2000b.Google Scholar
Misak, C. 2000. Truth, Politics, and Morality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, C. ed. 2007. New Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, H. 2003. ‘Truth as Convenient Friction,’ Journal of Philosophy 100: 167–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramberg, B. 2000. ‘Post-Ontological Philosophy of Mind: Rorty versus Davidson,’ in Brandom 2000b.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1965. ‘Mind-Body Identity, Privacy, and Categories,’ in Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem, D., Rosenthal ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1970. ‘Incorrigibility as the Mark of the Mental,’ Journal of Philosophy 67: 399–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. 1971. ‘In Defense of Eliminative Materialism,’ in Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem, D., Rosenthal ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1991. ‘Texts and Lumps,’ in Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1998a. ‘Robert Brandom on Social Practices and Representations,’ in Truth and Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. 1998b. ‘The Very Idea of Human Answerability to the World: John McDowell's Version of Empiricism,’ in Truth and Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. 1998c. ‘Dewey Between Hegel and Darwin,’ in Truth and Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. 1999. ‘Pragmatism as Anti-Authoritarianism,’ Revue Internationale de Philosophie 53: 7–20.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 2000. ‘Response to Ramberg,’ in Brandom 2000b.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1968. Science and Metaphysics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1975. ‘Autobiographical Reflections,’ in Action, Knowledge, and Reality: Critical Studies in Honor of Wilfrid Sellars, Castañeda, Hector-Neri ed. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1991. Science, Perception and Reality. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1997. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stout, J. 2007. ‘On Our Interest in Getting Things Right: Pragmatism without Narcissism,’ in Misak 2007.Google Scholar