Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:38:33.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.): Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology; Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1970), 441 pp. +ix.

Review products

M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.): Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology; Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1970), 441 pp. +ix.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

C. A. Hooker
C. A. Hooker*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Notice
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , June 1972 , pp. 489 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Feyerabend, Paul K.. KWF Knowledge Without Foundation, Oberlin College, mimeographed, 1961.Google Scholar
2. Feyerabend, Paul K.. ARIE “An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience”; Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 58 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Feyerabend, Paul K.. RIQT “Reichenbach's Interpretation of the Quantum Theory”; Philosophical Studies, IX (1958), 47.Google Scholar
4. Feyerabend, Paul K.. C “Complementarity”; Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement, 32 (1958).10.1093/aristoteliansupp/32.1.75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Feyerabend, Paul K.. BPN “Professor Bohm's Philosophy of Nature”; British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, X (1960), 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Feyerabend, Paul K.. PETE “Das Probleme der Existenz Theoretischer Entitaten”; (in) Probleme der Erkenntis Theorie, Festschrift fuer Viktor Kraft, Vienna, 1960.Google Scholar
7. Feyerabend, Paul K.. ERE “Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism”; (in) Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol.II, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1962.Google Scholar
8. Feyerabend, Paul K.. PMP “Problems of Microphysics”; (in) Colodny, R. (ed.), Pittsburgh Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. I, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1962.Google Scholar
9. Feyerabend, Paul K.. HBGE “How to be a Good Empiricist”; (in) Baumrin, B. (ed.), Philosophy of Science: The Delaware Seminar, vol. II, Inter-Science, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
10. Feyerabend, Paul K.. PE-I “Problems of Empiricism”; (in) Colodny, R. (ed.); Pittsburgh Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. II, Prentice-Hall, N.J., 1965.Google Scholar
11. Feyerabend, Paul K.. MST “On the Meaning of Scientific Terms”; Journal of Philosophy, LXII (1965), 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Feyerabend, Paul K.. RN Review of Nagel's, E. The Structure of Science, The British journal for the Philosophy of Science, 6 (1966), 237.Google Scholar
13. Feyerabend, Paul K.. RC “Replies to Criticism”; (in) Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. II, Humanities Press, Press, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
14. Feyerabend, Paul K.. ISA “On the Improvement of the Sciences and the Arts, and the Possible Identity of the Two”; Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. III, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1968.Google Scholar
15. Feyerabend, Paul K.. BGSE “Bemerkungen zur Geschichte und Systematik des Empirismus”; (in) Weingartner, P. (ed.), Metaphysik und Wissenschaft, G. Pustet, Salzburg, 1968.Google Scholar
16. Feyerabend, Paul K.. CE “Classical Empiricism”; (in) Butts, R. E. and Davis, J. W. (eds.), The Methodological Heritage of Newton, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1970.Google Scholar
17. Feyerabend, Paul K.. SWE “Science Without Experience”; The Journal of Philosophy, LXVI (1969), 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Feyerabend, Paul K.. RCC “On a Recent Critique of Complementarity”; Philosophy of Science, 35 (1968), p. 309 (Part I), and 36 (1969), 82 (Part II).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Feyerabend, Paul K.. CS “Consolations for the Specialist”; (in) Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, London, 1970.Google Scholar
20. Feyerabend, Paul K.. DCP “In Defense of Classical Physics”; History and Philosophy of Science, I (1970), 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Feyerabend, Paul K.. AM “Against Method”; (in) Radner, M. and Winokur, S. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol.IV, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1970.Google Scholar
22. Feyerabend, Paul K.. PSGP “Philosophy of Science: A Subject with a Great Past”; (in) Stuewer, R. H. (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. V, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1970.Google Scholar
23. Feyerabend, Paul K.. PE-II “Problems of Empiricism II”; (in) Colodny, R. (ed.), Pittsburgh Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1969.Google Scholar