Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:47:49.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Locke on the Motivation to Suspend Desire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2021

Matthew A. Leisinger*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

This paper takes up two questions regarding Locke’s doctrine of suspension. First, what motivates suspension? Second, what are the conditions under which we are motivated to suspend? In response to the first question, I argue that suspension is motivated by the desire to avoid the possible future evils that might result from acting precipitately upon some desire without suspending. In response to the second question, I argue against the common assumption that the desire motivating suspension must be an agent’s most pressing desire.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaron, Richard I. 1971. John Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Vere. 1994. “Locke on the Freedom of the Will.” In Locke’s Philosophy: Content and Context, edited by Rogers, G. A. J., 101–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Vere. 2000. “Locke on the Suspension of Desire.” In John Locke: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding in Focus , edited by Fuller, Gary, Stecker, Robert, and Wright, John P., 236–48. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Colman, John. 1983. John Locke’s Moral Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Jack D. 2003. “Locke’s Finely Spun Liberty.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (2): 203–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don. 2015. “Liberty and Suspension in Locke’s Theory of the Will.” In A Companion to Locke, edited by Stuart, Matthew, 260–78. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauser, Richard. 2003. “Thinking and Willing in Locke’s Theory of Human Freedom.” Dialogue 42 (4): 695724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauser, Richard. 2014. “Locke and the Problem of Weakness of the Will.” In Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan, edited by Reboul, Anne, 483–99. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited in-text as “Treatise” by book, part, section, and paragraph.Google Scholar
Leisinger, Matthew A. 2017. “Locke’s Arguments against the Freedom to Will.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (4): 642–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leisinger, Matthew A. 2020. “Locke’s Diagnosis of Akrasia.” Journal of Modern Philosophy 2 (1): 6, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1975. An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cited in-text by book, chapter, and section.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1996. “Some Thoughts Concerning Education.” In Some Thoughts Concerning Education and Of the Conduct of the Understanding , edited by Grant, Ruth W. and Tarcov, Nathan, 1161. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. Cited in-text as “Some Thoughts” by section.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1997. Political Essays. Edited by Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LoLordo, Antonia. 2012. Locke’s Moral Man. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losonsky, Michael. 1995. “Reasoned Freedom: John Locke and Enlightenment by Peter Schouls.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (2): 293314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 1986. “Necessity and the Will in Locke’s Theory of Action.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (2): 149–63.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 2005. Locke. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mabbott, J. D. 1973. John Locke. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magri, Tito. 2000. “Locke, Suspension of Desire, and the Remote Good.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1): 5570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moauro, Leonardo, and Rickless, Samuel C.. 2019. “Does Locke Have an Akrasia Problem?Journal of Modern Philosophy 1 (1): 9, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickless, Samuel C. 2000. “Locke on the Freedom to Will.” The Locke Newsletter 31: 4367.Google Scholar
Rickless, Samuel C. 2013a. “Locke on Active Power, Freedom, and Moral Agency.” Locke Studies 13: 3354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickless, Samuel C. 2013b. “Will and Motivation.” In The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, edited by Anstey, Peter R., 393413. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rickless, Samuel C. 2014. Locke. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouls, Peter A. 1992. Reasoned Freedom: John Locke and Enlightenment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Matthew. 2013. Locke’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vailati, Ezio. 1990. “Leibniz and Locke on Weakness of Will.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (2): 213–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Julie. 2014. “Locke on the Power to Suspend Desire.” Locke Studies 14: 121–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Julie. 2018. “Locke’s Last Word on Freedom: Correspondence with Limborch.” Res Philosophica 95 (4): 637–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Julie, and Lennon, Thomas M.. 2019. “Absential Suspension: Malebranche and Locke on Human Freedom.” Journal of Modern Philosophy 1 (1): 8, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Shelley. 2016. Consciousness in Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar