Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:08:48.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hylemorphism, remnant persons and personhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Patrick Toner
Patrick Toner*
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Animalism is the doctrine that we human beings are – are identical with – animals. Hylemorphism is a form of animalism. In this paper, I defend hylemorphism by showing that while other forms of animalism fall prey to the problem of ‘Remnant Persons, ’ hylemorphism does not. But hylemorphism’s account of personhood seems to have some very implausible implications. I address one of those implications, and argue that it isn’t nearly as objectionable as it might at first appear.

Keywords

Aquinaspersonhoodanimalismhylemorphismpersonal identity
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 76 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, Lynne Rudder. 2000. Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey. 2010. “Aristotelian Endurantism.” Mind 119: 883–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. 1911a. “Monophysites and Monophysitism.” In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company, Retrieved December 30, 2013 from New Advent:http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10489b.htm.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. 1911b. “Monothelitism and Monothelites.” In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company, Retrieved December 30, 2013 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10502a.htm.Google Scholar
Geddes, L. 1911. “Person.” In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company, Retrieved December 30, 2013 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11726a.htm.Google Scholar
Hershenov, David. 2008. “A Hylomorphic Account of Thought Experiments Concerning Personal Identity.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82: 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Mark. 2006. “My Body is Not an Animal.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, edited by Zimmerman, D.. V.4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loux, Michael. 2006. Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oderberg, David. 2008. Real Essentialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Olson, Eric. Forthcoming. “Animalism and the Remnant-Person Problem.” In Metaphysics of the Self, edited by Gonçalves, J.. New York: Peter Lang, http://www.shef.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.173538!/file/lisbon.pdf.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 2012. “We Are Not Human Beings.” Philosophy 87: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Thomas. 1985. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Selner-Wright, Susan. 2010. “Thomistic Personalism and Creation Metaphysics: Personhood vs. Humanity and Ontological vs. Ethical Dignity.” Journal of Thomistic Personalism, http://courseweb.stthomas.edu/rmlemmons/STP’Selner-Wright%20draft%2011.14.09.pdf.Google Scholar
Stephens, William. 1998. “Masks, Androids, and Primates: The Evolution of the Concept ‘Person’.” Etica & Animalia 9: 111–127.Google Scholar
Toner, Patrick. 2006. “Meta-ontology and Accidental Unity.” Philosophical Quarterly 56: 550–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toner, Patrick. 2008. “Emergent Substance.” Philosophical Studies 141: 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toner, Patrick. 2010a. “On Substance.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84: 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toner, Patrick. 2010b. “St. Thomas Aquinas on Death and the Separated Soul.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91: 587–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toner, Patrick. 2011a. “Hylemorphic Animalism.” Philosophical Studies 155: 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toner, Patrick. 2011b. “On Hylemorphism and Personal Identity.” European Journal of Philosophy 19: 454–473.Google Scholar
Toner, Patrick. 2012. “St. Thomas Aquinas on the Problem of Too Many Thinkers.” Modern Schoolman 89: 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Peter. 2006. All the Power in the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mary Anne. 1973. “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion.” Monist 57: 43–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed