Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:30:47.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grounds and ‘Grounds’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Bradley Rettler
Bradley Rettler*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97273, Waco, TX, 76798USA.
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, I offer a new theory of grounding. The theory has is that grounding is a job description that is realized by different properties in different contexts. Those properties play the grounding role contingently, and grounding is the property that plays the grounding role essentially. On this theory, grounding is monistic, but ‘grounding’ refers to different relations in different contexts. First, I argue against Kit Fine’s monist univocalism. Next, I argue against Jessica Wilson’s pluralist multivocalism. Finally, I introduce monist multivocalism, explicate three versions of it, and show its advantages.

Keywords

Groundingfundamentalitymetametaphysicsmetaphysicsmetaontology
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 47 , Issue 5 , 2017 , pp. 631 - 655
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Audi, Paul. 2012. “A Clarification and Defense of the Notion of Grounding.” In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by Correia, Fabrice and Schnieder, Benjamin, 101–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Elizabeth. forthcoming-a. “Symmetric Dependence”. In Reality and its Structures, edited by Bliss, Ricki and Priest, Graham, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Elizabeth. manuscript. “Ways of Truthmaking.”Google Scholar
Bennett, Karen. 2011. “Construction Area: No Hard Hat Required.” Philosophical Studies 154 (1): 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, Einar. 2009. “Composition as Identity: A Study in Ontology and Philosophical Logic.” Open Access Dissertations Paper 92.Google Scholar
Cameron, Ross. 2008. “Turtles All the Way Down: Regress, Priority and Fundamentality in Metaphysics.” The Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230): 1–14.Google Scholar
Cameron, Ross. 2010. “How to Have a Radically Minimal Ontology.” Philosophical Studies 151 (2): 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Ross. forthcoming. “Truthmakers.” In The Oxford Handbook of Truth, edited by Glanzberg, Michael, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chudnoff, Elijah. manuscript. “Grounding and Entailment.”Google Scholar
Correia, Fabrice. 2005. In Existential Dependence and Cognate Notions, Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
Correia, Fabrice. 2008. “Ontological Dependence.” Philosophy Compass 3 (5): 1013–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, Fabrice. 2010. “Grounding and Truth-Functions.” Logique et Analyse 53 (211): 251–279.Google Scholar
Daly, Chris. 2012. “Scepticism about Grounding.” In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by Correia, Fabrice and Schnieder, Benjamin, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Shamik. forthcoming. “The Status of Ground.”Google Scholar
deRosset, Louis. 2010. “Getting Priority Straight.” Philosophical Studies 149 (1): 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deRosset, Louis. 2013. “Grounding Explanations.” Philosopher’s Imprint 13 (7): 1–26.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. 1995. “Ontological Dependence.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95: 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Kit. 2010. “Some Puzzles of Ground.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (1): 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Kit. 2012a. “A Guide to Ground.” In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by Correia, Fabrice and Schnieder, Benjamin, 37–80. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Kit. 2012b. “The Pure Logic of Ground.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funkhouser, Eric. 2006. “The Determinable-Determinate Relation.” Noûs 40 (3): 548–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, Aaron. 2015. "Towards a Pluralist Theory of Truthmaking." Erkenntnis 80 (6):1157–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofweber, Thomas. 2009. “Ambitious, yet Modest, Metaphysics.” In Metametaphysics, edited by Chalmers, David Manley David and Wasserman, Ryan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inman, Ross. manuscript. “Finding the Fundamentality of Intermediates.”Google Scholar
Jenkins, C. S. 2011. “Is Metaphysical Grounding Irreflexive?” The Monist 2: 267–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslicki, Kathrin. 2012. “Varieties of Ontological Dependence.” In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by Correia, Fabrice, 186–213. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslicki, Kathrin. 2013. “Ontological Dependence: An Opinionated Survey.” In Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Grounding, Supervenience, Response-Dependence, edited by STeinberg, A., Hoeltje, M. and Schnieder, B., 31–64. München: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
Koslicki, Kathrin. 2015. “The Coarse-Grainedness of Grounding.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics Volume 9, edited by Zimmerman, Dean W. and Bennett, Karen, 306–344. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 1994. “Ontological Dependency.” Philosophical Papers XXIII 1: 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael P. 2009. Truth as One and Many. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Alex. 1996. “The Metaphysics of Properties.” Mind 105: 1–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, Michael J. 2012. “In Defence of Ground.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4): 687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. 2005. “Why Truthmakers?” In Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Beebee, Helen and Dodd, Julian, 17–31. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. 2015. “Grounding is not a Strict Order.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (3): 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. 2010. “Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.” In Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology, edited by Hale, Robert and Hoffman, Aviv, 109–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2008. “Truthmaker Commitments.” Philosophical Studies 141: 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2009. “On What Grounds What.” In Metametaphysics, edited by Chalmers, David, Manley, David and Wasserman, Ryan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2010a. “The Least Discerning and Most Promiscuous Truthmaker.” The Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239): 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2010b. “Monism: The Priority of the Whole.” Philosophical Review 119 (1): 31–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2012. “Grounding, Transitivity, and Contrastivity.” In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by Correia, Fabrice and Schnieder, Benjamin, 122–138. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. forthcoming-a. “Ground Rules: Lessons from Wilson.” In Composition and Ground, edited by Aizawa, and Gillett, . Palgrave-MacMillan.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2016. “Grounding in the Image of Causation.” Philosophical Studies 173 (1): 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. Forthcoming. “Grounding as the Primitive Concept of Metaphysical Structure.”Google Scholar
Schnieder, Benjamin. 2006. “Truth-making without Truth-makers.” Synthese 152 (1): 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney. 2001. “Realization and mental causation.” In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, edited by Gillett, Carl, 23–33. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skiles, Alexander. 2015. “Against Grounding Necessitarianism.” Erkenntnis 80 (4): 717–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Naomi. 2016. “Metaphysical Interdependence.” In Reality Making, edited by Jago, Mark, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trogdon, Kelly. 2013. “Grounding: Necessary or Contingent?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (4): 465–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Jessica. 1999. “How superduper does a physicalist supervenience need to be?” Philosophical Quarterly 50 (194): 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Jessica. 2012. “Fundamental Determinables.” Philosopher’s Imprint 12 (4): 1–17.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jessica. 2014. “No Work for a Theory of Grounding.” Inquiry 57 (5–6): 535–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Jessica. forthcoming. “The Unity and Priority Arguments for Grounding.” In Scientific Composition and Metaphysical Ground, edited by Aizawa, Ken and Gillett, Carl.Google Scholar