Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:18:47.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finding Value in Davidson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Robert H. Myers
Robert H. Myers*
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Can an effective argument against scepticism about objective values be modelled on Donald Davidson's familiar argument against scepticism about external things?

Davidson evidently thinks so. He has long been on record as maintaining that a theory of interpretation must be ‘unified’ in the sense that it cannot merely solve f or beliefs and meanings but must simultaneously solve for desires as well. And he has made it quite clear that he thinks a theory of interpretation can do this only by subjecting attributions of desires to a ‘principle of charity’ analogous to the principle that he claims must govern attributions of beliefs. Since his argument against external world scepticism is in large part powered by his claim that charity must govern attributions of beliefs, his feeling that charity must likewise govern attributions of desires might appear to commit him to a similar argument against value scepticism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 107 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, G.E.M. 1963. Intention, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1974. ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheine.’ Reprinted in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1980. ‘Toward a Unified Theory of Meaning and Action.’ Reprinted in his Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1984. ‘Expressing Evaluations.’ Reprinted in his Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1986. ‘Judging Interpersonal Interests.’ Reprinted in his Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1987. ‘Knowing One's Own Mind.’ Reprinted in his Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1990. ‘Epistemology Externalized.’ Reprinted in his Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1992. ‘The Second Person.’ Reprinted in his Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1994. ‘Radical Interpretation Interpreted.’ Philosophical Perspectives 8: 121-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1995. ‘The Objectivity of Value.’ Reprinted in his Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1999. ‘Reply to A.C. Genova.’ In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Hahn, L. ed. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 2000. ‘Objectivity and Practical Reason.’ Reprinted in his Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. and Lepore, E. 1992. Holism: A Shopper's Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. and Lepore, E. 1994. ‘Is Radical Interpretation Possible?’ Philosophical Perspectives 8: 101-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G. 1977. The Nature of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1739. A Treatise of Human Nature, Selby-Bigge, L.A. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hurley, P. 2002. ‘A Davidsonian Reconciliation of Internalism, Objectivity, and the Belief-Desire Theory.’ The Journal of Ethics 6: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J.L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. Moody-Adams, M. 1997. Fieldwork in Familiar Places. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, R.H. 1999. Self-Governance and Cooperation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sreenivasan, G. 2001. ‘Understanding Alien Morals.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62:1-32.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1980. ‘Internal and External Reasons.’ Reprinted in his Moral huck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar