Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:36:52.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinables, Determinates, and Causal Relevance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Sven Walter
Sven Walter*
Affiliation:
University of Osnabrück Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mental causation, our mind's ability to causally affect the course of the world, is part and parcel of our ‘manifest image’ of the world. That there is mental causation is denied by virtually no one. How there can be such a thing as mental causation, however, is far from obvious. In recent years, discussions about the problem of mental causation have focused on Jaegwon Kim's so-called Causal Exclusion Argument, according to which mental events are ‘screened off’ or ‘preempted’ by physical events unless mental causation is a genuine case of overdetermination or mental properties are straightforwardly reducible to physical properties.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 217 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, L. 1993. ‘Metaphysics and mental causation.’ In Mental Causation, Heil, J. & Mele, A. eds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baker, L. 1995. Explaining Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. 1995. ‘Causal relevance and nonreduetive physicalism.’ Erkenntnis 42 (1995) 339–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. 1988. Events and their Names. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1989. ‘Reasons and causes.’ Philosophical Perspectives 3 (1989) 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehring, D. 1996. ‘Mental causation, determinables and property instances.’ Noüs 30 (1996) 461–80.Google Scholar
Fales, E. 1982. ‘Generic universals.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (1982) 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1989. ‘Making mind matter more.’ Philosophical Topics 17 (1989) 59–79. Reprinted in A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1990.Google Scholar
Heil, J. 2003. ‘Multiply realized properties.’ In Physicalism and Mental Causation: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action, Walter, S. & Heckmann, H.-D. eds. Thoverton: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Horgan, T. 1993. ‘From supervenience to superdupervenience: Meeting the demands of a material world.’ Mind 102 (1993) 555–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, D. 1997. ‘From Heaps and Gaps to Heaps of Gluts.’ Mind 106 (1997) 440–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. & Pettit, P. 1990. ‘Program explanation: A general perspective.’ Analysis 50 (1990) 107–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.E. 1921. Logic, Part I. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1984a. ‘Supervenience and supervenient causation.’ Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (1984) 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1984b. ‘Epiphenomenal and supervenient causation.’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9 (1984) 257–70. Reprinted in Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Press 1993.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1984c. ‘Concepts of supervenience.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (1984) 153–76. Reprinted in Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Press 1993.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1988. ‘Explanatory realism, causal realism, and explanatory exclusion.’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 12 (1988) 225–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1989. ‘Mechanism, purpose, and explanatory exclusion.’ Philosophical Perspectives 3 (1989) 77–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1990. ‘Explanatory exclusion and the problem of mental causation.’ In Information, Semantics and Epistemology, Villanueva, E. ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1993. ‘Postscripts on mental causation.’ In Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 2002. ‘Responses.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2002) 671–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 2003. ‘Blocking causal drainage and other maintenance chores with mental causation.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2003) 151-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 2005. Physicalism, Or Something Near Enough. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Leiter, B. & Miller, A. 1998. ‘Closet dualism and mental causation.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (1998) 161–81.Google Scholar
Lepore, E. & Loewer, B. 1989. ‘More on making mind matter.’ Philosophical Topics 19 (1989) 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, C. & MacDonald, G. 1986. ‘Mental causes and explanation of action.’ Philosophical Quarterly 36 (1986) 145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B. 1984. ‘Event supervenience and supervenient causation.’ Southern Journal Of Philosophy 22 (1984) 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B. 1989. ‘Type epiphenomenalism, type dualism, and the causal priority of the physical.’ Phüosophical Perspectives 3 (1989) 109-35.Google Scholar
Schröder, J. 2003. ‘Mental causation: The supervenience argument and the proportionality constraint.’ In Voluntary Action: An Issue at the Interface of Nature and Culture, Maasen, S. Prinz, W. & Roth, G. eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, G. & Sober, E. 1991. ‘The causal efficacy of content.’ Phüosophical Studies 63 (1991) 1–30.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1980. ‘Causality and properties.’ In Time and Cause, Inwagen, P. Van ed. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 2001. ‘Realization and mental causation.’ I Physicalism and its Discontents, Gillett, C. & Loewer, B. eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vicente, A. 2001. ‘Realization, determination and mental causation.’ Theoria 16 (2001) 77–94.Google Scholar
Walter, S. 2005. ‘Program explanations and mental causation.’ Ada Analytica 20 (2005) 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, S. 2006. ‘Causal exclusion as an argument against non-reductive physicalism.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (2006) 67–83.Google Scholar
Walter, S. forthcoming-a. ‘The supervenience argument, overdetermination, and causal drainage: Assessing Kim's master argument.’Google Scholar
Walter, S. forthcoming-b. ‘The epistemological approach to mental causation.’Google Scholar
Worley, S. 1997. ‘Determination and mental causation.’ Erkenntnis 46 (1997) 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yablo, S. 1992. ‘Mental causation.’ Philosophical Review 101 (1992) 245–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yablo, S. 1997. ‘Wide causation.’ Philosophical Perspectives 11 (1997) 251–81.Google Scholar
Yablo, S. 2000. ‘Seven habits of highly effective thinkers.’ In Proceedings of the 20th World Congress of Philosophy, Vol. 9, 35–46. Bowling Green: Philosophy Documentation Center.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yablo, S. 2001. ‘Superproportionality and mind-body relations.’ Theoria 16 (2001) 65–75.Google Scholar