No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Critical Notice: Thomas Sattig’s The Double Lives of Objects: An Essay in the Metaphysics of the ordinary world, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
Abstract
This critical notice describes some of Thomas Sattig’s book The Double Lives of Objects: An Essay in the Metaphysics of the Ordinary World and raises several critical issues about it.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017
References
Burke, Michael. 1994. “Preserving the Principle of One Object to a Place: A Novel Account of the Relations Among Objects, Sorts, Sortals, and Persistence Conditions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 591–624. 10.2307/2108583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evnine, Simon. 2016. Making Objects and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198779674.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Kit. 1999. “Things and Their Parts.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 23: 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandy, Richard. 1975. “Stuff and Things.” Synthese 31: 479–485. 10.1007/BF00485215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korman, Daniel Z. 2015. Review of Sattig in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews: An Electronic Journal http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/59331-the-double-lives-of-objects-an-essay-in-the-metaphysics-of-the-ordinary-world/.Google Scholar
Koslicki, Kathrin. 2008. The Structure of Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539895.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1983. “Parthood and Identity Across Time.” The Journal of Philosophy 80: 201–220. 10.2307/2026004CrossRefGoogle Scholar