Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:08:08.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical notice of Words and Contents, by Richard Vallée

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2021

Robert J. Stainton Open the ORCID record for Robert J. Stainton [Opens in a new window]  and
Arthur Sullivan
Robert J. Stainton*
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Arthur Sullivan
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Section I gives an overview of the contents of “Words and Contents”, and lays out the plan for this Critical Notice. Section II expounds Vallée’s Perry-inspired Pluri-Propositional semantic framework, and Section III is an in-depth case study, focused on complex demonstratives. In Sections IV-V we develop some criticisms, and in Section VI we suggest a solution to these difficulties, which builds on Vallée’s innovative work.

Keywords

semanticspragmaticsindexicalityreference
Type
Critical Notice
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , February 2021 , pp. 143 - 157
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Edited by Urmson, J. O. and Sbisa, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1976. “Reply to Foster.” In Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, edited by Evans, G. and McDowell, J., 33–41. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1978. “What Metaphors Mean.” Critical Inquiry 5 (1): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Legaspe, Justina, Lui, Chang, and Stainton, Robert J.. 2020. “Slurs and Register.” Mind & Language (34): 1–27.Google Scholar
Ezcurdia, Maite, and Stainton, Robert J.. 2013. “Introduction to the Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy.” In The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy, edited by Ezcurdia, M. and Stainton, R. J., xiii–xxxiv. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. “On Sense and Reference.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie (100): 25–50.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” Syntax and Semantics (3): 41–58.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1977/1989. “Demonstratives.” In Themes from Kaplan, edited by Almog, Joseph, Perry, John, and Wettstein, Howard, 481–563. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korta, Kepa, and Perry, John. 2011. Critical Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Richard. 1970. “English as a Formal Language.” In Linguaggi nella Società e nella Tecnica, edited by Visentini, B., 189–224. Milan: Edizioni di Communitá.Google Scholar
Perry, John. 1986. “Thought without Representation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (60): 137–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, John. 2001. Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Perry, John. 2006. “Using Indexicals.” In Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language, edited by Devitt, M. and Hanley, M., 313–34. Oxford: Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. “On Denoting.” Mind (14): 479–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Charles. 1997. “Pragmatics.” In Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of Language, edited by Hale, Bob, Wright, Crispin, and Miller, Alexander, 87–107. Oxford: Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
Vallée, Richard. 2018. Words and Contents. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar