Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:49:53.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Causal Principles, Degrees of Reality, and the Priority of the Infinite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Georgette Sinkler
Georgette Sinkler*
Affiliation:
Washington University, St. Louis, MO63130, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Descartes’ version of the Cosmological Argument in the Third Meditation is usually considered a failure, not because its conclusion doesn't follow from its premises, but because the truth of two of its premises is doubtful. One of these premises is that the objective reality of an idea is derived from a cause in which there is at least as much formal reality; the other, that only a being that possesses the qualities normally attributed to God could be responsible for the idea of God. Typically there are two objections made in response to the first of these premises. First, we don't understand the concepts of formal and objective reality well enough to know whether or not the premise commands our assent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 61 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[AT vol. #, page #]: René Descartes, Oeuvres de Descartes, vols. I-XII, Charles, Adam and Paul, Tannery ed. (Paris: Léopold Cerf 1897–1913).Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan ed. The Complete Works of Aristotle, vols. I and II (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1984).Google Scholar
[C, page #]: Curley, E.M. Descartes Against the Skeptics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1978).Google Scholar
[CB, page #]: Conversation with Burman, trans. with intra. and comm. by John Cottingham (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1976).Google Scholar
[CSM vol. #, page #]: The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vols. I & II, trans. Cottingham, J. Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1985).Google Scholar
[EG, page #]: Gilson, Etienne Etudes sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans Ia formation du système Cartésien (Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin 1951).Google Scholar
[K, page #]: Kenny, Anthony Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy (New York: Random House 1968).Google Scholar
[R, page #]: Rowe, William The Cosmological Argument (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1975).Google Scholar
[BW, page #]: Williams, Bernard Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry (New York: Penguin Books 1978).Google Scholar