Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:30:49.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Autonomy and Addiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Neil Levy
Neil Levy*
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Whatever its implications for the other features of human agency at its best — for moral responsibility, reasons-responsiveness, self-realization, flourishing, and so on—addiction is universally recognized as impairing autonomy. But philosophers have frequently misunderstood the nature of addiction, and therefore have not adequately explained the manner in which it impairs autonomy. Once we recognize that addiction is not incompatible with choice or volition, it becomes clear that none of the Standard accounts of autonomy can satisfactorily explain the way in which it undermines fully autonomous agency. In order to understand to what extent and in what ways the addicted are autonomy-impaired, we need to understand autonomy as consisting, essentially, in the exercise of the capacity for extended agency. It is because addiction undermines extended agency, so that addicts are not able to integrate their lives and pursue a Single conception of the good, that it impairs autonomy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 427 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainslie, G. 2000. ‘A Research-Based Theory of Addictive Motivation.’ Law and Philosophy 19 77–115.Google Scholar
Ainslie, G. 2001. Breakdown of Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arpaly, N. 2004. ‘Which Autonomy?’ in Freedom and Determinism, Campbell, J.K., O'Rourke, M., and Shier, D., eds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Benson, P. 1991. ‘Autonomy and Oppressive Socialization.’ Social Theory and Practice 17 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, P. 1994. ‘Free Agency and Self-worth.’ Journal of Philosophy 91 650-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnie, R.J. 2001. ‘Addiction and Responsibility.’ Social Research 68 813-34.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. 2000. ‘Reflection, Planning, and Temporally Extended Agency.’ Philosophical Review 109 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charland, L.C. 2002. ‘Cynthia's Dilemma: Consenting to Heroin Prescription.’ American Journal ofBioethics 2 37–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christman, J. 1991. ‘Autonomy and Personal History.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 211-24.Google Scholar
Christman, J. 2003. ‘Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy.’ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E.N. Zalta, ed. URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2003/entries / autonomy-moral /Google Scholar
Dennett, D.C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G. 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, C. 2002. ‘Who Holds the Leash?’ American Journal ofBioethics 2 48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elster, J. 1999. Strong Feelings: Emotion, Addiction and Human Behavior. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingarette, H. 1988. Heavy Drinking: The Myth of Alcoholism as a Disease. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, J.M. and Ravizza, M.. 1998. Responsibility and Control: An Essay on Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foddy, B. and Savulescu, J.. 2006. ‘Can Addicted Heroin Users Consent to the Prescription of Their Drug?’ Bioethics 20 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H. 1988. ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of the Person,’ in The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, R. 2003. ‘How is Strength of Will Possible?’ in Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality, Stroud, S. and Tappolet, C., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holton, R. 2004. ‘Rational Resolve.’ Philosophical Review 113 507-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. 1890. Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Kane, R. 1996. The Significance of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leshner, A. 1999. ‘Science-Based Views of Drug Addiction and Its Treatment’ Journal of the American Medical Association 282 1314-16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, G. 2000. ‘Willpower: A Decision Theorist's Perspective.’ Law and Philosophy 19 51–76.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N.. 2000. ‘Introduction: Autonomy Refigured,’ in Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspective on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N., eds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. 1981. ‘Metacognition and the Rules of Delay,’ in Social Cognitive Development,Google Scholar
Flavell, J.H. and Ross, L., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neale, J. 2002. Drug Users in Society. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, M.L., Mischel, W., and Shoda, Y.. 1989. ‘Cognitive Person Variables in the Delay of Gratification of Older Children at Risk.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (1989) 358-67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schelling, T.C. 1992. ‘Self-Command: A New Discipline,’ in Choice over Time, Loewenstein, G. and Elster, J., eds. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., and Peake, P.K.. 1990. ‘Predicting Adolescent Cognitive and Self- Regulatory Competencies from Preschool Delay of Gratification: Identifying Diagnostic Conditions.’ Developmental Psychology 26 978-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slote, M. 1986. ‘Understanding Free Will,’ in Moral Responsibility, Fischer, J.M., ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sobell, L.C., Ellingstad, T.P., and Sobell, M.B.. 2000. ‘Natural Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Problems: Methodological Review of the Research with Suggestions for Future Directions.’ Addiction 95 749-64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strayhorn, J.M. 2002. ‘Self-Control: Theory and Research.’ Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 41 7–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, G. 1975. ‘Free Agency.’ Journal of Philosophy 72 205-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G. 1999. ‘Excusing Addiction.’ Law and Philosophy 18 589–619.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. 2002. The Illusion Of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaffe, G. 2002. ‘Recent Work on Addiction and Responsible Agency.’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 178–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar