Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:17:33.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Animal confinement and use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Robert Streiffer  and
David Killoren
Robert Streiffer
Affiliation:
Medical History and Bioethics, Philosophy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
David Killoren
Affiliation:
Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We distinguish two conceptions of confinement – the agential conception and the comparative conception – and show that the former is intimately related to use in a way that the latter is not. Specifically, in certain conditions, agential confinement constitutes use and creates a special relationship that makes neglect or abuse especially egregious. This allows us to develop and defend an account of one important way in which agential confinement can be morally wrong. We then discuss some of the account’s practical implications, including its usefulness for decision-making in real-world contexts in which animals are confined.

Keywords

Animal ethicsanimal captivityanimal confinementanimal usespecial relationships
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, E., 2004. “Animal Rights and the Values of Nonhuman Life.” In Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions., edited by Sunstein, C. R. and Nussbaum, M., 297–298. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Association of Zoos and Aquariums. 2017. “About Us.” Accessed 6 October. https://www.aza.org/about-usGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, A., 2009. “Do Animals Have an Interest in Liberty?” Political Studies, 57 (3): 660–679. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00742.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGrazia, D., 2002. Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGrazia, D., 2011. “The Ethics of Confining Animals: From Farms to Zoos to Human Homes.” In The Oxford Handbook Of Animal Ethics, by Beauchamp, T. and Frey, R., 738–768. Oxford:Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, B., and Milburn, J.. 2017. “In Defence of Backyard Chickens.” Journal of Applied Philosophy. doi:10.1111/japp.12291.Google Scholar
Francis, L. P., and Norman, R.. 1978. “Some Animals are More Equal than Others.” Philosophy, 53 (206): 507–527. doi:10.1017/S0031819100026358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruen, L., 2011a. Ethics and Animals: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruen, L., 2011b. “The Ethics of Captivity.” On the Human Forum. http://onthehuman.org/2011/06/the-ethics-of-captivity/Google Scholar
Gruen, L., 2015. Entangled Empathy: An Alternative Ethic for Our Relationships with Animals. Brooklyn: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
Hutchins, M., Smith, B., and Allard, R.. 2003. “In Defense of Zoos and Aquariums: The Ethical Basis for Keeping Wild Animals in Captivity.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 223 (7): 958–966. doi:10.2460/javma.2003.223.issue-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jamieson, D., 2002a. “Against Zoos.” In Morality’s Progress: Essays on Humans, Other Animals, and the Rest of Nature, by Jamieson, D., 166–175. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jamieson, D., 2002b. “Zoos Revisited.” In Morality’s Progress: Essays on Humans, Other Animals, and the Rest of Nature, by Jamieson, D., 176–183. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kamm, F. M., 2007. “Nonconsequentialism.” In Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm, by Kamm, F. M., 11–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C., 2005. “Fellow Creatures: Kantian Ethics and Our Duties to Animals.” Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 25: 77.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C., 2011. “Interacting With Animals: A Kantian Account.” In The Oxford Handbook Of Animal Ethics, by Beauchamp, T. and Frey, R., 91–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C., 2012. “A Kantian Case for Animal Rights.” In Animal Law: Developments and Perspectives in the 21st Century, by Michel, M., Kühne, D. and Hänni, J., 3–27. Zürich: Dike.Google Scholar
Mastro, L. L., Conover, M. R., and Nicole Frey, S.. 2008. “Deer–Vehicle Collision Prevention Techniques.” Human-Wildlife Conflicts, 2 (1): 80–92.Google Scholar
McMahan, J. 2008. “Eating Animals The Nice Way.” Daedalus, 137 (1): 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, F. D., 2017. “Behavioral and Psychological Outcomes for Dogs Sold as Puppies through Pet Stores And/Or Born in Commercial Breeding Establishments: Current Knowledge and Putative Causes.” Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 19 (Supplement C): 14–26. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2017.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, F. D., Duffy, D. L., and Serpell, J. A.. 2011. “Mental Health of Dogs Formerly Used as ‘Breeding Stock’ in Commercial Breeding Establishments.” Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 135 (1–2): 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, C., 2011. Animal Ethics in Context. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, D., 2011. On What Matters, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, W. 1989. “Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine Of Double Effect.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18 (4): 334–351.Google ScholarPubMed
Rachels, J., 1976. “Do Animals Have A Right To Liberty?” In Animal Rights and Human Obligations, by Regan, T. and Singer, P., 205–223. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rice, D., 2011. “Deer-Car Collisions Increase This Time of Year.” USA Today, November 1. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2011-10-31/deer-car-accidents-rise/51019604/1.Google Scholar
Rollin, B., 1995. Farm Animal Welfare. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Rolston, H., 1988. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T., 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Scruton, R., 2000. Animal Rights and Wrongs. London: Metro Books.Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 2008. Animals and the Moral Community: Mental Life, Moral Status, and Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streiffer, R., 2014. “The Confinement of Animals Used in Laboratory Research.” In The Ethics of Captivity, by Gruen, L., 174–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P., 1986. Respect for Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
The Humane Society of the United States. 2012. USDA Inspection Report Quotes: Examples of Severe Violations. http://www.humanesociety.org/assets/pdfs/pets/puppy_mills/usda_severe_violations_pm.pdfGoogle Scholar
The Humane Society of the United States. 2016. Puppy Mills: Facts and Figures. http://www.humanesociety.org/assets/pdfs/pets/puppy_mills/puppy-mills-facts-and-figures.pdfGoogle Scholar
World Association of Zoos and Aquariums. 2005. Building a Future for Wildlife: The World Zoo and Aquarium Conservation Strategy. Berne, Switzerland. http://www.waza.org/files/webcontent/1.public_site/5.conservation/conservation_strategies/building_a_future_for_wildlife/wzacs-en.pdfGoogle Scholar