Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:07:13.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Silencing Speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Ishani Maitra
Ishani Maitra*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, Newark, Newark, NJ07102, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Pornography deserves special protections, it is often said, because it qualifies as speech. Therefore, no matter what we think of its content, we must afford it the protections that we extend to most speech, but don't extend to other actions. In response, Jennifer Hornsby and Rae Langton have argued that the case is not so simple: one of the harms of pornography, they claim, is that it silences women's speech, thereby preventing women from deriving from speech the very benefits that warranted the special protections in the first place. At first glance, it is hard to see how to make sense of this response. If the claim is that pornography prevents women from actually uttering words, then it just seems false; on the other hand, if that isn't the claim, then it isn't clear how anyone can be said to be silenced. Faced with such worries, many have been inclined to dismiss these claims about silencing as confused.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 309 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, J.L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Second Edition, Urmson, J.O. and Sbisá, M. eds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1993. ‘Women and Pornography.’ The New York Review of Books 40: 36–42.Google Scholar
Green, L. 1998. ‘Pornographizing, Subordinating, and Silencing.’ In Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation, Post, R.C. ed. Los Angeles: The Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities. 285–311.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. 1989a. ‘Meaning.’ Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 213–23.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. 1989b. ‘Utterer's Meaning and Intentions.’ Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 86–116.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. 1989c. ‘Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning.’ Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 117–37.Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. 1993. ‘On Being Objective and Being Objectified.’ A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Antony, L.M. and Witt, C. eds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 85–125.Google Scholar
Hornsby, J. 1994. ‘Illocution and Its Significance.’ Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. Tsohatzidis, S.L. ed. New York: Routledge. 187–207.Google Scholar
Hornsby, J. 1995. ‘Disempowered Speech.’ Philosophical Topics 23: 127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornsby, J. and Langton, R.. 1998. ‘Free Speech and Illocution.’ Legal Theory 4: 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, D. 1995. ‘Freedom of Speech Actsヨ A Response to Langton.’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 24: 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, R. 1993. ‘Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 22: 293–330.Google Scholar
Langton, R. 1997. ‘Love and Solipsism.’ Love Analyzed. Lamb, R.E. ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 123–52.Google Scholar
Langton, R. 1998. ‘Subordination, Silence, and Pornography's Authority.’ Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation. Post, R.C. ed. Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities. 261–83.Google Scholar
Langton, R. and West, C.. 1999. ‘Scorekeeping in a Pornographic Language Game.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77: 303–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, C.A. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maitra, I. 2004. ‘Silence and Responsibility.’ Philosophical Perspectives 18: 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitra, I. and McGowan, M.K.. 2007. ‘The Limits of Free Speech: Pornography and the Question of Coverage.’ Legal Theory 13: 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, S. 1972. Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
West, C. 2003. ‘The Free Speech Argument Against Pornography.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33: 391–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar