Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:31:45.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scott Soames What is Meaning? Princeton: Princeton University Press 2010. Pp. x + 132.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Brian Ball
Brian Ball*
Affiliation:
St Anne's College, University of Oxford, OxfordOX2 6HS, UNITED KINGDOM
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Notice
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 575 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach, Kent 1987. Thought and Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bealer, George 1979. ‘Theories of Properties, Relations, and Propositions,’ The Journal of Philosophy 76: 634–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benacerraf, Paul 1965. ‘What Numbers Could Not Be,’ Philosophical Review 74: 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory 1989. An Ontology of Art. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with the Scots Philosophical Club.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1967. ‘Truth and Meaning,’ Synthese 17: 304–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 2001. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Jeffrey C. ‘Structured Propositions,’ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2006 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/propositions-structured/>..>Google Scholar
Davies, David 2004. Art as Performance. Malden, MA: Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David 2007. The Nature and Structure of Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David 1980. ‘Index, Context, and Content.’ In Philosophy and Grammar, Kanger, S. and Ohman, S. eds. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Ninan, Dilip 2010. ‘Semantics and the Objects of Assertion,’ Linguistics and Philosophy 33: 355–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, John 1979. ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical,’ Nous 13: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott 1987. ‘Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content,’ Philosophical Topics 15: 44–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott 1989. ‘Semantics and Semantic Competence,’ Philosophical Perspectives 3: 575–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott 1992. ‘Truth, Meaning, and Understanding,’ Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 65: 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott 2009. Philosophical Essays. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott 2010. What is Meaning? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press in association with Soochow University, Taiwan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy 2002. ‘Necessary Existents,’ in Logic, Thought, and Language, O'Hear, A. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar