Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:31:28.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Puccetti and Brain Bisection: An Attempt at Mental Division

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1978

Roger J. Rigterink*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Fond Du Lac

Extract

Science is full of surprises. Fortunately, most of these surprises are small. A scientist, for example, might make an unexpected discoverey, but the discovery simply adds new data in support of an old theory. Or perhaps the discovery will endanger an existing theory, but one which has only local import. In cases like these, the existing theory will be modified, or perhaps even rejected; but the research tradition which surrounds the local theory will remain, by and large, unaffected and will continue on.

Small surprises are welcomed within science; they are part of the daily grist. Science needs them in order to advance in an orderly fashion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogen, Joseph E. [1969] “The Other Side of the Brain I: Dysgraphia and Dyscopia Following Cerebral CommissurotomyBulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society 34, pp. 73105.Google Scholar
Bogen, Joseph E. [1977] “Further Discussion on Split-Brains and Hemispheric CapabilitiesBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28, pp. 281286.10.1093/bjps/28.3.281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larry, DeWitt [1975] “Consciousness, Mind, and Self: The Implications of the Split Brain StudiesBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26, pp. 4147.Google Scholar
Gallup, G.G. Jr. [1970] “Chimpanzees’ Self-RecognitionScience 167, pp. 8687.10.1126/science.167.3914.86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michail S. [1970] The Bisected Brain (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York).Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michail S. [1972] “One Brain- Two Minds?American Scientist 10, pp. 311317.Google Scholar
Hecaen, H. and Angelergues, R. [1962] “Agnosia for Faces (Prosopagnosia)Archives of Neurology 7, pp. 92100.10.1001/archneur.1962.04210020014002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, D. [1973] “The Asymmtry of the Human BrainScientific American 228 pp. 7078.10.1038/scientificamerican0373-70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, J. Trevarthen, C. and Sperry, R. W.Perception of Bilateral Chemeric Figures Following Hemisphere DeconnectionBrain 95, pp. 6178.10.1093/brain/95.1.61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D. M. [1966] “Cerebral Control and the Conscious Control of Action” in Brain and Conscious Experience ed. by Eccles, J. C. pp. 422444.Google Scholar
Joseph, Margolis [1975] “Puccetti on Brains, Minds, and PersonsPhilosophy of Science 42, pp. 275280.Google Scholar
Thomas, NagelBrain Bisection and the Unity of ConsciousnessSynthese 27, pp. 396413.Google Scholar
Nebes, R. D. [1974] “Hemispheric Specialization in Commissurotomized ManPsychological Bulliten 81, pp. 114.10.1037/h0035626CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popper, Karl R. and Eccles, John C. [1977] The Self and Its Brain (Springer International, New York).10.1007/978-3-642-61891-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, Puccetti [1973a] “Brain Bisection and Personal Identity!British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24, pp. 339355.Google Scholar
Roland, Puccetti [1973b] “Multiple IdentityThe Personalist 54, pp. 203215.Google Scholar
Roland, Puccetti [1975a] “A Reply to Professor MargolisPhilosophy of Science 42, pp. 281285.Google Scholar
Roland, Puccetti [1975b] “Physicalism and the Evolution of ConsciousnessCanadian Journal of Philosophy 1, pt. 2, suppl., pp. 171183.Google Scholar
Roland, Puccetti [1976] “The Mute Self: A Reaction to DeWitt's Alternative Account of the Split-Brain DataBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27, pp. 6573.Google Scholar
Roland, Puccetti [1977a] “Robinson On My Views: A CorrectionBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27, p. 171.Google Scholar
Roland, Puccetti [1977b] “Sperry On Conciousness: A Critical AppreciationJournal of Medicine and Philosophy 2, pp. 127144.Google Scholar
Roland, Puccetti [1978a] “The Refutation of MaterialismCanadian Journal of Philosophy 8, pp. 157162.Google Scholar
Roland, Puccetti [1978b] “Pearce On Behalf of the MaterialistCanadian Journal of Philosophy 8, pp. 169172.Google Scholar
Daniel, Robinson [1976] “What Sort of Persons Are Hemispheres? Another Look at ‘Split Brain’ ManBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27, pp. 7378.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Jerome A. [1977] “Personal Identity: The Implications of Brain Bisection and Brain TransplantsJournal of Medicine and Philosophy 2, pp. 147161.10.1093/jmp/2.2.147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. [1966] “Speech and Other Functions after Left (Dominant) HemispherectomyJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry 29, pp. 467471.10.1136/jnnp.29.5.467CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperry, R. W. [1967] “Split Brain Approach to Learning Problems” in The Neurosciences: A Study Program ed. by Quartan, Gardner C. Melnechuk, Theordore and Schmitt, Francis O. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.)Google Scholar
Sperry, R. W. [1968] “Hemisphere Deconnection and Unity In Conscious AwarenessAmerican Psychologist 23, pp. 723733.10.1037/h0026839CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperry, R. W. [1977] “Forebrain Commissurotomy and Conscious AwarenessJournal of Medicine and Philosophy 2, pp. 101126.10.1093/jmp/2.2.101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaidel, E. [1973] “Linguistic Competence and Related Functions in the Right Cerbral Hemisphere Following Commissurotomy and Hemispherectomy” Doctoral dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Dissertation Abstracts International 34 (1973): 2350B, University Microfilms no. 73-26, 481.Google Scholar
Zaidel, E. [1976] “Auditory Language Comprehension in the Right Hemisphere Following Cerebral Commissurotomy and Hemispherectomy: A Comparison With Child Language and Aphasia” in The Acquisition and Break-down of Language: Parallels and Divergences ed. by Zurif, E. and Cramazza, A. (Johns Hopkins, Baltimore).Google Scholar