Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:34:11.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marx, Atheism and Revolutionary Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

David Myers*
Affiliation:
Moorhead State University

Extract

Prima facie there is confusion in that part of Marx's theory which deals with religion and revolution. On the basis of Marx's scattered statements on religion one can construct two views of the relationship between revolutionary action and the abolition of the religious mentality. One view is that the exploited class can come to atheism prior to the creation of communist society, and, indeed, must attain a secular consciousness if it is to be the agency of revolution. The other view is that the power of religion cannot be broken until after the communist revolution because only a new economic order can remove the material conditions which sustain religion as a mass phenomenon.

In the face of these conflicting views we are left with two alternatives. Either we can take one of the constructions as the authentic one, or, we can conclude that Marx's position is incoherent. Seeking the best in both worlds, my approach involves showing why the charge of incoherence appears plausible while arguing for a resolution in the direction of the first construction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lenin, V.I. Selected Works Volume XI, translated by the Marx-Engels-Lenin Institute (New York: International Publishers n.d.) 659.Google Scholar

2 Ibid. 661.

3 Ibid. 663.

4 Ibid. 670.

5 Ibid. 668–669.

6 Engels, F. Herr Eugen Dühring's Revolution in Science (Anti-Dühring), translated by Burns, Emile (New York: International Publishers 1939).Google Scholar In the preface to this work Engels states that the ‘genesis and development of the mode of outlook expounded in this book were due in far greater measure to Marx, and only in a very small degree to myself’ (p. 13). It must be said in Engels favor that he had a talent for clearly explaining Marx's position.

7 The German Ideology, Volume V of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Collected Works, translated by Dutt, C. and Magill, C.D. (New York: International Publishers 1976).Google Scholar The first section on Ludwig Feuerbach (pp. 27-93) contains Marx's early statement of the doctrine of historical materialism.

8 Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society (hereafter abbreviated as WYM), translated and edited by Easton, L. and Guddat, K. (New York: Anchor Books 1967) 314.Google Scholar

9 The German Ideology, 81.

10 Ibid., 3.

11 WYM 250.

12 Capital Volume I, translated by Moore, S. and Aveling, E. (New York: Modern Library n.d.) 83.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., 91; WYM 305.

14 WYM 257-258.

15 WYM 290.

16 On Religion, Volume V in The Karl Marx Library, translated and edited by Padover, Saul (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company 1974) 94.Google Scholar

17 WYM 390.

18 Lenin op. cit., 667.

19 For a sampling of this see WYM 64-66.

20 A good study of Marx's relationship to the Leftwing Hegelians is McLellan, David The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx (London: MacMillan 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 WYM 64-66.

22 ‘Toward the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Law: Introduction’ in WYM 250.

23 Ibid., 250.

24 In his treatment of religion as an instrument of the ruling class, Marx seemed to ignore its revolutionary potential. Although he made it clear why a theist cannot be a revolutionary in his restricted sense, he did not show why theists in mass numbers could not participate in a successful socialist revolution which could radically change the organization of work and the distribution of goods. He seemed to a priori — without Justification — assign religion a reactionary role.

25 Marx's notion that religion is merely a reflection of the failure of the masses to satisfy particular psychological and material needs fails, I think, to do Justice to the complexity of motivation for religious belief. For example, it does not take into account the manner in which religion solves the problem of human mortality, a problem which communism in no way addresses.

26 This is the general theme of Marx's attack on Feuerbach, Bauer and Stirner in The German Ideology.

27 Ibid., 236.

28 Ibid., 30.

29 Capital Volume I 91-92.

30 WYM 305.

31 Engels Anti-Dühring 344-345; see note 6 for confirmation of this book as a reflection of Marx's thought.

32 Marx's ‘Theses on Feuerbach’ in The German Ideology, 4.

33 Engels op.cit., 345.

34 The German Ideology 78-79.

35 Marx, Critique of the Gotha Program’ in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Selected Works in One Volume (New York: International Publishers 1969) 319335.Google Scholar

36 Kelle, V. and Kovalson, M. Historical Materialism: An Outline of Marxist Theory of Society (Moscow: Progress Publishers 1973) 253.Google Scholar

37 Hobsbawm, EricReligion and the Rise of Socialism’ in Marxist Perspectives 1 (1978) 1433.Google Scholar

38 See The German Ideology 35-45 and, of course, ‘Preface’ to The Critique of Political Economy in K. Marx and F. Engels Selected Works, 181-185.

39 ‘General Rules of the International Working Men's Association’ in Karl Marx: On The First International edited and translated by Saul Padover (New York: McGraw-Hill 1973) 13.

40 The German Ideology 438.

41 Ibid., 48-49.

42 K. Marx and F. Engels Selected Works 181-185.

43 Cohen, G.A. Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defense (New Jersey: Princeton U. P. 1978) 24.Google Scholar

44 Marx, Grundrisse, translated by Nicolaus, Martin (New York: Vintage Books 1973) 706.Google Scholar

45 This is not to say that this is the only class which needs religion. Clearly members of the petty·bourgeoisie (the small shopkeepers) may find comfort in religion as their very livelihood is daily threatened by large·scale industry. Also clearly those involved in the institution of religion — from theologians to pastors — have an interest in the continuation of religion.

46 K. Marx and F. Engels on Religion (Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House 1955) 301.

* The criticisms of the Editors of this Journal and of Carroll Engelhardt were helpful in the preparation of this paper.