Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:30:22.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Function of Epistemic Justification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Frederick Adams
Frederick Adams*
Affiliation:
Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI, 48859, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is a venerable and thoroughly entrenched tradition of regarding epistemic justification as playing an essential cognitive role in the acquisition, maintenance, or even loss of knowledge. Hold fixed that p is true and that S believes that p. Given this, whether S comes to know that p, still knows that p, or no longer knows that p essentially depends upon whether S has acquired, sustained, or lost justification for believing that p. I shall call any theory which regards epistemic justification as playing this essential epistemological function in cognition a Jn-theory. To simplify, we will say that a Jn-theorist is one who holds that - when the truth of p is held constant and S's belief that p is held constant - S's knowledge that p varies directly with the victory of S's justification and indirectly with its defeat.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 1986 , pp. 465 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Achinstein, Peter The Nature of Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press 1983.Google Scholar
[2] Adams, Frederick ‘A Goal-State Theory of Function Attributions.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1979), 493–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Audi, Robert ‘Defeated Knowledge, Reliability, and Justification.’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1980), 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Bonjour, Laurence ‘Externalist Theories of Empirical Knowledge.’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1980), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Dretske, Fred Knowledge And The Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 1981.Google Scholar
[6] Dretske, Fred ‘Précis of Knowledge and the Flow of Information.’ The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1983), 55–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Dretske, Fred ‘The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge.’ Philosophical Studies 40 (1981), 363–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Goldman, Alvin ‘The Internalist Conception of Justification.’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1980), 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Goldman, Alvin ‘The Relation Between Epistemology and Psychology.’ Unpublished.Google Scholar
[10] Goldman, Alvin ‘What is Justified Belief?’ In Pappas, 1-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Pappas, George ed. Justification And Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Shope, Robert The Analysis of Knowing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1983.Google Scholar
[13] Swain, Marshall Reason And Knowledge. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 1981.Google Scholar
[14] Van Fraassen, Bas The Scientific Image. Oxford: The Clarendon Press 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar