Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:01:57.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ernest Sosa. A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007. Pp. xiii + 149.

Review products

Ernest Sosa. A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007. Pp. xiii + 149.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Christopher Lepock*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ONM5R 2M8, Canada

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Notice
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, W. P. 2005. Beyond ‘Justification’: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bernecker, S. 2006. ‘Prospects for Epistemic Compatibilism’. Philosophical Studies 130: 81104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. 2008. ‘Meta-Cognition in Animals: A Skeptical Look.Mind and Language 23: 5889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J. 2003. ‘Knowledge as Credit for True Belief.’ In Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology. DePaul, M. and Zagzebski, L. eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, S. R. 2001. ‘Ernest Sosa, Knowledge, and Understanding.Philosophical Studies 106: 171–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, J. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. and T., Horgan. 2007. ‘Some Ins and Outs of Transglobal Reliabilism.’ In Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Goldberg, S. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. 2007. ‘Why We Don't Deserve Credit for Everything We Know.Synthese 158: 345–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. 2009. ‘Knowledge and Credit.Philosophical Studies 142: 2742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepock, C. 2006. ‘Adaptability and Perspective.Philosophical Studies 129: 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, W.D. 2007. ‘Why epistemologists are so down on their luck.Synthese 158: 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schooler, J.W. and T.Y., Engstler-Schooler. 1990. ‘Verbal Overshadowing of Visual Memories: Some Things are Better Left Unsaid.Cognitive Psychology 22: 3671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sosa, E. 1996. ‘Postscript to “Proper Functionalism and Virtue Epistemology”.’ In Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honour of Plantinga's Theory of Knowledge, Kvanvig, J.L. ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 1997. ‘How to Resolve the Pyrrhonian Problematic.Philosophical Studies 85: 229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. 2004. ‘Replies.’ In Ernest Sosa and His Critics. Greco, J. ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 2009a. ‘Replies to Brown, Pritchard, and Conee.Philosophical Studies 143: 427–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. 2009b. ‘Replies to Commentators on A Virtue Epistemology.Philosophical Studies 144: 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, L. 1996. Virtues of the Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar