Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T00:34:21.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beliefs do not come in degrees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Andrew Moon
Andrew Moon*
Affiliation:
Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Philosophers commonly say that beliefs come in degrees (or that beliefs are graded or that there are partial beliefs). Drawing from the literature, I make precise three arguments for this claim: an argument from degrees of confidence, an argument from degrees of firmness, and an argument from natural language. I show that they all fail. I also advance three arguments that beliefs do not come in degrees: an argument from natural language, an argument from intuition, and an argument from the metaphysics of degrees. On the basis of these arguments, I conclude that beliefs do not come in degrees.

Keywords

Beliefconfidencedegrees of beliefpartial beliefdegrees
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 47 , Issue 6 , 2017 , pp. 760 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, David. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511583308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert. 2011. Rationality and Religious Commitment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609574.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, John, and Pargetter, Robert. 1988. “Quantities.” Philosophical Studies 54: 287–304. 10.1007/BF00646273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchak, Lara. 2014. “Belief, Credence, and Norms.” Philosophical Studies 169: 285–311. 10.1007/s11098-013-0182-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, David. 2004. Putting Logic in its Place. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0199263256.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Roger. 2013. “Belief is Credence One (in Context).” Philosopher’s Imprint 13: 1–18.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred. 1988. Explaining Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Lina, and Hájek, Alan. 2007. “What Are Degrees of Belief?” Studia Logica 86: 183–213. 10.1007/s11225-007-9059-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantl, Jeremy, and McGrath, Matthew. 2009. Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199550623.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1987. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Richard. 1992. “The Epistemology of Belief and the Epistemology of Degrees of Belief.” American Philosophical Quarterly 29: 111–124.Google Scholar
Frankish, Keith. 2009. “Partial Belief and Flat-Out Belief.” In Degrees of Belief, edited by Huber, Franz and Schmidt-Petri, Christoph, 75–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1007/978-1-4020-9198-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardenfors, Peter and Makinson, David. 1988. “Revisions of Knowledge Systems Using Epistemic Entrenchment.” In Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, edited by Verde, Moshe, 83–95. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufman.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 2004. “On the Ontology of Belief.” In Semantik Und Ontologie, edited by Siebel, Mark and Textor, Mark, 185–222. Heusenstamm: Frankfurt Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1986. Change in View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Holton, Richard. 2008. “Partial Belief, Partial Intention.” Mind 117: 27–58. 10.1093/mind/fzn002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Franz. 2009. “Introduction.” In Degrees of Belief, edited by Huber, Franz and Schmidt-Petri, Christoph, 1–33. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4020-9198-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Franz. 2016. “Formal Representations of Belief.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed January 11. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/formal-belief/Google Scholar
Hunter, Daniel. 1996. “On the Relation Between Categorical and Probabilistic Belief.” Noûs 30: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, Richard. 1970. “Dracula Meets Wolfman: Acceptance vs. Partial Belief.” In Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief, edited by Swain, Marshall, 157–185. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. 10.1007/978-94-010-3390-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. E. 1921. Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Mark. 1996. Decision Theory as Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511804847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konek, Jason. 2016. “Probabilistic Knowledge and Cognitive Ability.” Philosophical Review 125: 509–587. 10.1215/00318108-3624754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennertz, Benjamin. 2015. “Quantificational Credences.” Philosophers’ Imprint 15: 1–24.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moon, Andrew. forthcoming. “The Nature of Doubt and a New Puzzle About Belief, Doubt, and Confidence.” Synthese.Google Scholar
Moon, Andrew. (draft). Knowledge and the Doxastic Attitudes.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Richard. 2015. “Epistemic Utility Arguments for Probabilism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed December 17. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemic-utility/Google Scholar
Ramsey, Frank. 1931. Truth and Probability. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Ross, Jacob, and Schroeder, Mark. 2014. “Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment 1.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88: 259–288. 10.1111/phpr.2014.88.issue-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rott, Hans. 2009. “Degrees All the Way Down: Beliefs, Nonbeliefs, Disbeliefs.” In Degrees of Belief, edited by Huber, Franz and Schmidt-Petri, Christoph, 301–339. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4020-9198-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric. 2015. “Belief.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed March 24 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/belief/Google Scholar
Smith, Martin. 2016. Between Probability and Certainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755333.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staffel, Julia. 2013. “Can There be Reasoning with Degrees of Belief?” Synthese 190: 3535–3551. 10.1007/s11229-012-0209-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, Scott. 2008. “Reason and the Grain of Belief.” Noûs 42: 139–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Weng. 2016. “Reliability Theories of Justified Credence.” Mind 125: 63–94. 10.1093/mind/fzv199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Woudenberg, Rene and Peels, Rik. forthcoming. “The Metaphysics of Degrees.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph. 2008. “Contextualism about Justified Belief.” Philosophers’ Imprint 8: 1–20.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Jonathan. forthcoming. “Belief in Psyontology.” Philosophers' Imprint. http://www.utm.utoronto.ca/~weisber3/articles/Psyontology.pdf.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Dean. 1995. “Theories of Masses and Problems of Constitution.” The Philosophical Review 104: 53–110. 10.2307/2186012CrossRefGoogle Scholar