Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:00:59.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attachment to Territory: Status or Achievement?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Avery Kolers
Avery Kolers*
Affiliation:
University of Louisville, Louisville, KY40292, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is by now widely agreed that a theory of territorial rights must be able to explain attachment or particularity: what can link a particular group to a particular place with the kind of normative force necessary to forbid encroachment or colonization? Attachment is one of the pillars on which any successful theory of territory will have to stand. But the notion of attachment is not yet well understood, and such agreement as does exist relies on unexamined assumptions. One such assumption is that attachment is an achievement of some sort, as opposed to some kind of brute ascriptive status that a claimant has irrespective of anything it might do.

But achievements do not come for free. ‘Achievement’ is a success term, and any theory predicated on success, no matter how minimal, requires a theory of failure. Yet theorists of territory have not grappled with the problem of failure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 101 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arneil, B. (1996). John Locke and America: The Defense of English Colonialism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bérubé, M. (2009). ‘Equality, Freedom, and/or Justice for All: A Response to Martha Nussbaum.’ Metaphilosophy 40: 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. (1991). Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Christiano, T. (2006) ‘A Democratic Theory of Territory and Some Puzzles about Global Democracy.’ Journal of Social Philosophy 37: 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, W. (2002). Struggle for the Land: Native North American Resistance to Genocide, 2nd ed. San Francisco: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
Gans, C. (2001). The Limits of Nationalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, S. (2011). A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan, Tuck, R. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996). The Metaphysics of Morals, Gregor, M. ed. & trans. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, E.F. (2009). ‘The Personal is Philosophical is Political: A Philosopher and Mother of a Cognitively Disabled Person Sends Notes from the Battlefield.’ Metaphilosophy 40: 606–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolers, A. (2000). ‘The Lockean Effi ciency Argument and Aboriginal Land Rights.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78: 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolers, A. (2009). Land, Confl ict, and Justice: A Political Theory of Territory. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolers, A. (forthcoming). ‘Floating Provisos and Sinking Islands.’ Journal of Applied Philosophy. Online early view: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2012.00569.x/pdf.Google Scholar
Levy, J. (2000). The Multiculturalism of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatises of Government, Laslett, P. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maaka, R. and Fleras, A.. (2000). ‘Engaging with Indigeneity: Tino Rangatiratanga in Aotearoa.’ In Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Ivison, D. Patton, P. and Sanders, W. eds. New York: Cambridge University Press: 89–109.Google Scholar
Matthews, A. (2002). Where the Buffalo Roam: Restoring America's Great Plains, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1995). On Nationality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2000). Citizenship and National Identity. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2007). National Responsibility and Global Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2012). ‘Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification.’ Political Studies 60: 252—268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. (1998). ‘The Territorial Dimension of Self-determination.’ In National Self-determination and Secession, Moore, M. ed. New York: Oxford University Press: 134—57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. (2001). The Ethics of Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nine, C. (2008). ‘A Lockean Theory of Territory.’ Political Studies 56: 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nine, C. (2010). ‘Ecological Refugees, States Borders, and Territory.’ Journal of Applied Philosophy 27: 359—75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nine, C. (2012). Global Justice and Territory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. (2002). World Poverty and Human Rights. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Risse, M. (2009). ‘The Right to Relocation: Disappearing Island Nations and Common Ownership of the Earth.’ Ethics & International Affairs 23: 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. (1996). ‘Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.’ Vol. 2, Part Two, chapter 4, section 3.1. Government of Canada Web Archive. August 02, 2006. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/ webarchives/20071211054344/ (accessed March 14, 2012).Google Scholar
Simmons, A.J. (2001). ‘On the Territorial Rights of States.’ Philosophical Issues 11: 300–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilz, A. (2009). ‘Why do States have Territorial Rights?’ International Theory 1: 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilz, A. (2011). ‘Nations, States, and Territory.’ Ethics 121: 572–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamir, Y. (1993). Liberal Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. (2009). The Divided Ground: Indians, Settlers, and the Northern Borderland of the American Revolution. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Tully, J. (1994). An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Program. (1997). Human Development Report 1996. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2003). ‘Indigeneity? First Peoples and Last Occupancy.’ New Zealand Journal of Public International Law 1: 55–82.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
World Wildlife Fund. (2010). ‘WWF Living Planet Report 2010.’ World Wildlife Fund website. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_lpr2010_lr_en.pdf (accessed 26 December 2011).Google Scholar