Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:48:47.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Against the new Cartesian Circle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Everett Fulmer  and
C.P. Ragland
Everett Fulmer*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA
C.P. Ragland
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In two recent papers, Michael Della Rocca accuses Descartes of reasoning circularly in the Fourth Meditation. This alleged new circle is distinct from, and more vicious than, the traditional Cartesian Circle arising in the Third Meditation. We explain Della Rocca’s reasons for this accusation, showing that his argument is invalid.

Keywords

DescartesmeditationscircularityCartesian Circlefourth meditationMichael Della Rocca
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , 2017 , pp. 66 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul, eds. 1974–86. Oeuvres de Descartes [Works of Descartes]. 2nd ed. 11 vols. Paris: Vrin/CNRS.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. 2009. Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes’s Meditations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Christofidou, Andrea. 2013. Self, Reason, and Freedom: A New Light on Descartes’ Metaphysics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Murdoch, Dugald, trans. 1984–5. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, and Kenny, Anthony, trans. 1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: The Correspondence. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2005. “Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1): 1–33. 10.1111/phpr.2005.70.issue-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2006. “Judgment and Will.” In The Blackwell Guide to Descartes Meditation, edited by Gaukroger, Stephen, 142–159. Malden, MA: Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2011. “Taking the Fourth: Steps toward a New (Old) Reading of Descartes.” Midwest Studies In Philosophy 35: 93–110. 10.1111/misp.2011.35.issue-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1972. “Descartes on the Will.” In Cartesian Studies, edited by Butler, R. J., 1–31. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Naaman-Zauderer, Noa. 2010. Descartes’ Deontological Turn. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511778995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Lex. 1999. “The Fourth Meditation.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3): 559–591. 10.2307/2653783CrossRefGoogle Scholar