Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T14:56:13.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Modularity and the Nature of Emotions1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Luc Faucher  and
Christine Tappolet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume , Volume 32: The Modularity of Emotions , 2006 , pp. vii - xxxi
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Our thanks to Frédéric Bouchard, John King, Mohan Matthen and Pierre Poirier for helpful comments.

References

Ackerman, B. PAbe, J. A. A and Izard, C. E. 1998. Differential emotions theory and emotional developmentIn What Develops in Emotional Development? eds. Mascolo, M. F and Griffin, S, 85–106. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armon-Jones, C. 1986. The thesis of constructionism. In The Social Construction of Emotions ed. Harre, R, 2–56. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. B 1960. Emotion and Personality New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, W 2002. The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology Nature 415: 757-64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Averill, J. R 1980. A constructivist view of emotionsIn Emotion: Theory, Research and Experience, Vol. I. Theories of Emotion ed. Plutchnik, R and Kellerman, H, 305–339. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C 2005. Enzymatic computation and cognitive modularity Mind and Language 20: 259-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, H. C 2006. Modularity and Design ReincarnationIn The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition ed. Carruthers, PLaurence, S and Stich, S, 199–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C and Kurzban, R. 2006. Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate Psychological Review 113 (3): 628-47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A. T. 1976. Cognitive Theory and the Emotional Disorders New York: Meridian.Google Scholar
Bergeron, V. 2007. Anatomical and functional modularity in cognitive science: Shifting the focus Philosophical Psychology 20:175-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callebaut, W and Rasskin-Gutman, D. 2005. Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Natural Complex Systems Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, J. JKermoian, R and Witherington, D. 1996. An epigenetic perspective on emotional developmentIn Emotion: Interdisciplinary Perspectives ed. Kavanaugh, RZimmerberg, B and Fein, S, 119-38. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. 2006. The case for massively modular models of mindIn Comtemporary Debates in Cognitive Sciences ed. Stainton, Rob, 3–21. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Charland, L. C. 1995. Feeling and representing: Computational theory and the modularity of affect Synthese 105: 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. 1999. Modularity and cognition Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(3): 115-20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosmides, L and Tooby, J. 1995. From function to structure: The role of evolutionary biology and computational theories in cognitive neuroscienceIn The cognitive neurosciences ed. Gazzaniga, M, 1199–1210. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L and Tooby, J. 2000. Evolutionary psychology and the emotionsIn Handbook of Emotions (2nd ed.), ed. Lewis, M and Haviland-Jones, J. M, 91–115. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L and Tooby, J. 2004. Knowing thyself: The evolutionary psychology of moral reasoning and moral sentimentsIn Business, Science, and Ethics. The Ruffin Series No. 4 ed. Freeman, R. E and Werhane, P, 93–128. Charlottesville, VA: Society for Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain New York: Gossett/Putnam.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1987. Cognitive wheels: The frame problem in AIIn The Robots Dilemma: The Frame Problem and Other Problems of Holism in Artificial Intelligence ed. Pylyshyn, Z, 41–64. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
de Sousa, R. 1987. The Rationality of Emotion Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchaine, B. CYovel, GButterworth, E. J and Nakayama, K. 2006. Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms: Elimination of the alternative hypotheses in developmental case Cognitive Neuropsychology 23(5): 714-47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. 1972. Universal and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotionIn Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 9 ed. Cole, J, 207-82. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. 2007. Emotions Revealed: Recognizing Faces and Feelings to Improve Communication and Emotional Life (2nd ed.). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1999. Alchemies of the Mind Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Faucher, L. 1999. Emotions fortes, constructionnisme faible et elimination Philosophiques 26(1): 13–35.Google Scholar
Faucher, L and Tappolet, C. In press. Facts and values in emotional plasticity. InFact and Value in Emotion. Consciouness and Emotion series ed. Charland, L and Zachar, P. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Faucher, L, Poirier, P and Lachapelle, J. In press. The concept of innateness and the destiny of evolutionary psychology Mind and Behavior.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1985/1990. Précis of The Modularity of MindBehavioral and Brain Sciences 8:1–42; reprinted in Fodor, J, A Theory of Content and Other Essays Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 195–206.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 2000. The Mind Doesn't Work that Way Cambridge(Mass.): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, W. V. 1972. Cultural differences in facial expressions in a social situation: An experimental test of the concept of display rules Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Gauthier, ICurby, K. M and Epstein, R. 2005. Activity of spatial frequency channels in the fusiform face-selective area relates to expertise in car recognition Affective Behavioral Neuroscience 5(2): 222-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldie, P. 2000. The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J and Lewontin, R. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B, 205: 581-98.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 1990. Modularity and the psychoevolutionary theory of emotion Biology and Philosophy 5:175-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 1997. What Emotions Really Are Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 2007. Evo-Devo meets the mind: Towards a developmental evolutionary psychologyIn Integrating Development and Evolution ed. Sanson, R and Brandon, R. N, 195–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harré, R. 1986. An outline of the social constructivist viewpointIn The Social Construction of Emotions ed. Harré, R, 2–14. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haselton, M and Ketelaar, T. In press. Irrational emotions or emotional wisdom? The evolutionary psychology of affect and behaviorIn Hearts and Minds: Affective Influences on Social Cognition and Behavior ed. Forgas, J, 8th Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D, 1739-40/1973. A Treatise of Human Nature ed. Selby-Biggy, L. A and Nidditch, P. H. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. L. 1998. Consciousness in Action Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1992. Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective in Cognitive Science Cambrdige (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ketelaar, T and Au, W. T. 2003. The effects of guilty feelings on the behavior of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games: An affect-as-information interpretation of the role of emotion in social interaction Cognition and Emotion 17: 429-53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, C. 2003. Moralizing disgustingness Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66(2): 253-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lance, M and Tanesini, A. 2004. Emotion and rationalityIn New Essays in the Philosophy of Language and Mind, Canadian Journal of Philosophy suppl. vol. 30, ed. Ezcurdia, MStainton, R and Viger, C, 275-95. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Machery, E and Barrett, C. 2006. Debunking Adapting Minds Philosophy of Science 72: 232-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallon, R and Stich, S. P. 2000. The odd couple: The compatibility of social construction and evolutionary psychology Philosophy of Science 67(1): 133-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F. 2006. Cognitive architecture and descent with modification Cognition 101: 443-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, M. 1998. Biological universals and the nature of fear Journal of Philosophy 95:105–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montaigne, M. de. 1588/1962. Essais, vol. I. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohman, A and Mineka, S. 2001. Fear, phobias and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning Psychological Review 108: 483–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. 1997. How the Mind Works London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J. 2004. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, R. 2000. Massively modular minds: Evolutionary psychology and cognitive architectureIn Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition ed. Carruthers, P and Chamberlain, A, 13–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxe, RCarey, S and Kanwisher, N. 2004. Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging Annual Review of Psychology 55: 87–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scherer, K. RSchorr, A and Johnstone, T, eds. 2001. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlosser, G. 2004. The role of modules in development and evolutionIn Modularity in Development and Evolution ed. Schlosser, G and Wagner, G. P, 519-82. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schlosser, G and Wagner, G. P. 2004a. Introduction: The modularity concept in developmental and evolutionary biologyIn Modularity in Development and Evolution ed. Schlosser, G and Wagner, G. P, 1–11. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schlosser, G and Wagner, G. P. , eds. 2004b. Modularity in Development and Evolution Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Segal, G. 1996. The modularity of theory of mindIn Theories of the Theories of the Mind ed. Carruthers, P and Smith, K, 141-57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. 1966. The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. 1994. The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representationsIn Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture eds. Hirschfeld, L.A and Gelman, S.A, 39–67. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. 2002. In defense of massive modularityIn Language, Brain and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Melher ed. Dupoux, E, 47–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tappolet, C. 2000. Émotions et Valeurs Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tye, M. 2006. The thesis of nonconceptual contentIn The Structure of Nonconceptual Content, European Review of Philosophy vol. 6, eds. van Geen, C and de Vignemont, F, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 8–30.Google Scholar
Tooby, J, and Cosmides, L. 1990. The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments Ethology and Sociobiology 11: 375–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, JCosmides, L and Barrett, H. C. 2005. Resolving the debate on innate ideas: Learnability constraints and the evolved interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functionsIn The Innate Mind: Structure and Content eds. Carruthers, P, Laurence, S, and Stich, S, 305–337. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar