Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:38:57.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rawls on Global Distributive Justice: A Defence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Joseph Heath
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Critical response to John Rawls's The Law of Peopleshas been surprisingly harsh) Most of the complaints centre on Rawls's claim that there are no obligations of distributive justice among nations. Many of Rawls's critics evidently had been hoping for a global application of the difference principle, so that wealthier nations would be bound to assign lexical priority to the development of the poorest nations, or perhaps the primary goods endowment of the poorest citizens of any nation. Their subsequent disappointment reveals that, while the reception of Rawls's political philosophy has been very broad, it has not been especially deep. Rawls has very good reason for denying that there are obligations of distributive justice in an international context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume , Volume 31: Global Justice, Global Institutions , 2005 , pp. 193 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ark, B. V. and R. H., McGuckin “International Comparisons of Labour Productivity and Per Capita Income.” Monthly Labour Review Ouly (1999): 33–41.Google Scholar
Brian, Barry. Culture and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R.. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. “Rawls's Law of Peoples.” Ethics 110 (2000): 669-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, Joseph H. “Migration and Morality: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective,“ in Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money, ed. Barry, Brian and Goodin, Robert E. (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99 (1989): 906-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. “Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1997): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R.. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. “Property in Land.” Yale Law Journal 102 (1993): 1315–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph “Dworkin's Auction.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2004): 313-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L. B. “Institutions and the Demands of Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1998): 251-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martha, Nussbaum “Women and the Law of Peoples.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (2002): 283–306.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. W.. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.Google Scholar
John, Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
John, Rawls. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
John, Rawls Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. Scheffler, S. “What is Egalitarianism?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2003): 5–39.Google Scholar
Tan, K.-C. “Critical Notice of John Rawls: The Law of Peoples.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (2001): 113-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K.-C.Toleration, Diversity, and Global Justice. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 2000.Google Scholar