Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T16:41:00.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Emotion a Form of Perception?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Jesse J. Prinz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Theories of emotions traditionally divide into two categories. According to some researchers, emotions are or essentially involve evaluative thoughts or judgments. These are called cognitive theories. According to other researchers, an emotion can occur without any thought. These are called non-cognitive theories. Some defenders of non-cognitive theories argue that emotions are action tendencies, others say they are feelings, and still others say they are affect programs, which encompass a range of internal and external events. One of the most celebrated non-cognitive theories owes, independently, to William James and Carl Lange. According to them, emotions are perceptions of patterned changes in the body. I think the perceptual theory of emotions is basically correct, but it needs to be updated. In this discussion, I will offer a summary and defence.

The question I am addressing bears on the question of modularity. Within cognitive science, there is a widespread view that perceptual systems are modular.

Type
3. The Analogy with Perception
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume , Volume 32: The Modularity of Emotions , 2006 , pp. 136 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berthoz, S., E., Artiges, P.-F., Van de Moortele, J.-B., Poline, S., Rouquette, S. M., Consoli, and J.L., Martinot. 2002. Effect of impaired recognition and expression of emotions on frontocingulate cortices: An fMRI study of men with alexithymia. American Journal of Psychiatry 159: 961-67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, W. B. 1927. The James-Lange theory of emotion: A critical examination and an alternative theory. American Journal of Psychology 39: 106-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwalisz, K., E., Diener, and D., Gallagher. 1988. Autonomic arousal feedback and emotional experience: Evidence from the spinal cord injured. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 820-28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
H. D, Critchley, S., Wiens, P., Rotshtein, A., Öhman, and R. J., Dolan. 2004. Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nature Neuroscience 7:189-95.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Gossett/Putnam.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
A. R, Damasio, and G. W., Van Hoesen. 1983. Emotional disturbances associated with focal lesions of the limbic frontal lobe. In Neuropsychology of Human Emotion, ed. Heilman, K. M. and Satz, P.. (85–110) New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1988. Explaining Behavior. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1987. Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
James, W. 1884. What is an emotion? Mind 9: 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M. 1994. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R. D, Lane, G. L., Ahern, G. E., Schwartz, and A. W., Kaszniak. 1997. Is alexithymia the emotional equivalent of blindsight? Biological Psychiatry 42: 834-44.Google Scholar
Lange, C. G. 1885. Om Sindsbevaegelser: Et Psyko-fysiologisk Studie. Kjbenhavn: Jacob Lunds. Reprinted in The Emotions, ed. C. G. Lange and W. James, trans. I. A. Haupt. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1922.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E. 1996. The Emotional Brain. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Marañon, G. 1924. Contribution á l'étude de I’ action émotive de I’ adrenaline. Revue française d'endocrinologie 2: 301-25.Google Scholar
McGurk, H., and J., MacDonald. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264: 746-48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
K. L, Phan, T. D., Wager, S. F., Taylor, and I., Liberzon. 2004. Functional neuroimaging studies of human emotions. CNS Spectrums 9: 258-67.Google Scholar
Philippot, P., Chapelle, C., and Blairy, S.. 2002. Respiratory feedback in the generation of emotion. Cognition and Emotion 16: 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, J. J. 2000. The duality of content. Philosophical Studies 100: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, J. J. 2004. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J. 2005. Are emotions feelings? Journal of Consciousness Studies 12(8-10): 9–25.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J. 2006. Is the mind really modular? In Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science, ed. Stainton, R.. (22–36) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J. 2007. All consciousness is perceptual. In Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind, ed. McLaughlin, B. and Cohen, J.. (335–357) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stepper, S., and F., Strack. 1993. Proprioceptive determinants of affective and nonaffective feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 211-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, F., L. L., Martin, and S., Stepper. 1988. Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 768-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, S. 2005. Interoception in emotional experience. Current Opinion in Neurology 18: 442-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D. M, Wolpert, and J. R., Flanagan. 2001. Motor prediction. Current Biology 11: R729-R732.Google Scholar